Central Eye Care, Ltd.
Arlington Heights, Illinois, 60005, United States
NCT Number: NCT03006978
This is a small, pilot study intended to determine the feasibility of this product.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Arlington Heights, Illinois, 60005, United States
The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the TearCare® System in adult patients with clinically significant dry eye disease (DED). This was a prospective, single-center, randomized, parallel-group, clinical trial. Subjects with DED were randomized to either a single TearCare treatment conducted at the clinic or 4 weeks of daily warm compress (WC) therapy. The TearCare procedure consisted of 12 minutes of thermal eyelid treatment immediately followed by manual expression of the meibomian glands. WC therapy consisted of once daily application of the compresses to the eyelids for 5 minutes. Subjects were followed until 6 months post-treatment.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: 4 weeks
The TBUT was evaluated by measuring the time to breakup of the tear film following a complete blink when viewed through the slit-lamp using a cobalt blue filter. The TBUT was recorded using a stopwatch for each eye as the average of 3 measurements at each visit. The change in TBUT was The difference between the mean baseline value and the mean Month 1 value. The TBUT for each eye for a subject was averaged. An increase in TBUT represents an improvement.
Time frame: 1 month
Using a Korb Meibomian Gland Evaluator (TearScience), the meibomian gland assessment was conducted by evaluating the consistency of the secretions that were observed upon expression of meibomian glands in the nasal, central, and temporal regions of the lower eyelids. The central, consecutive 5 glands in each region were evaluated. The instrument was held at the eyelid margin for 10-15 seconds, and the secretions were graded on a 0-3 scale for each gland (0=no expression; 1=toothpaste; 2=cloudy; and 3=clear), with a 0-45 score range for each eye. The score for each eye of a subject was averaged. The change from baseline in the Meibomian Gland Score is the difference between the mean baseline value and the mean value at Month 1. A higher score represents an improvement.
Time frame: 1 Month
The Standard Patient Evaluation for Eye Dryness (SPEED) questionnaire is a well-validated instrument and widely used assessment tool for dry eye indications. The SPEED questionnaire was used to evaluate 4 symptoms (1-dryness, grittiness, or scratchiness, 2-soreness or irritation, 3-burning or watering, 3-eye fatigue) of study subjects. The maximum score is 28 (worst) and the minimum possible is 0 (best). The SPEED survey measures the severity (0-4 scale - each symptom) and frequency (0-3 scale - each symptom) of these DED symptoms. The SPEED score was calculated by adding the total of the frequency and severity scores; a score of greater than or equal to 6 may be an indicator of DED. The reported value is the mean of the change for all subjects. A negative result indicates improvement.
Time frame: 1 Month
The Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) is a 12-item questionnaire that assesses symptoms of ocular irritation associated with dry eye and the impact of these on vision-related activities. The OSDI score ranges from 0 (best possible) to 100 (worst possible). The change in OSDI questionnaire from baseline to Month 1 is the difference between the scores at the two timepoints. A negative value would indicate improvement and a positive value, a worsening. The reported value is the mean of the change for all subjects.
Time frame: 1 Month
The SANDE instrument is a simple 2-item questionnaire, that focuses on the frequency and the severity of dry eye symptoms with each measured along a visual analog scale. SANDE, because of its simplicity, is often used in routine clinical practice. For the core questions, the frequency and severity scores are multiplied together, and the square root is taken to produce an overall SANDE score from 0 (best possible) to 100 (worst possible). The mean change from baseline to month 1 is the difference in the two scores. A negative result indicates improvement.
Sight Sciences, Inc.
Industry
A Prospective, Single-center, Randomized, Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the TearCare System in Adults With Dry Eye Disease TearCare Pilot Study)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07089511
Dry Eye, Dry Eye Syndromes
Milan, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT06346340
Dry Eye, Dry Eye Syndromes
Laguna Hills, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07675460
Acne Cystic, Choroidal Thickness
Kayseri, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT04418999
Allergy, Corneal Diseases
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial Details