Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00481247

A Phase III Study of Dasatinib vs Imatinib in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

The purpose of this clinical research study is to compare the confirmed complete cytogenetic response of dasatinib with that of imatinib within 12 months after randomization in patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase Philadelphia positive chronic myeloid leukemia. The safety of this treatment will also be studied.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Local Institution, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female, aged 18 years and older
  • Chronic phase, Philadelphia Chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status score of 0-2

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pleural Effusion
  • Uncontrolled cardiovascular disease
  • Significant bleeding disorder unrelated to CML
  • Prior treatment with interferon/imatinib/dasatinib/anti-CML systemic treatments except anagrelide/hydroxyurea

Treatment and study plan

dasatinib

Drug

Tablets, oral, dasatinib 50-140 mg once daily (QD)

Other names: Sprycel®, BMS-354825

Imatinib

Drug

Tablets, oral, imatinib 200-800 mg, QD

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Best Confirmed Complete Cytogenetic Response (cCCyR) Within 12 Months

    Time frame: Pretreatment, every 3 months up to 12 months

    Cytogenetic response (CyR) is based on the prevalence of Philadelphia positive (Ph+) cells in metaphase from bone marrow (BM) sample. (Ideally, 25 metaphases but at least 20 metaphases from a BM sample were evaluated). Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR)=0% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM. A cCCyR=those in which all measurements up to at least 28 days after the initial response show an equivalent or better CCyR.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Remaining in Confirmed Complete Cytogenetic Response (cCCyR)

    Time frame: Years 2, 3, 4 and 5

    Cytogenetic response (CyR) is based on the prevalence of Philadelphia positive (Ph+) cells in metaphase from bone marrow (BM) sample. (Ideally, 25 metaphases but at least 20 metaphases from a BM sample were evaluated). Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR)=0% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM. A cCCyR=those in which all measurements up to at least 28 days after the initial response show an equivalent or better CCyR.

    Percentage of participants in cCCyR at years 2, 3, 4 and 5 was computed for all randomized participants who achieved cCCyR as measured from the time of first confirmation until the date of progression or death. Participants with cCCyR who neither progress nor die are censored on the date of their last cytogenetic assessment. Participants without cCCyR are considered to have progressed on Day 1.

  2. Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) at Any Time

    Time frame: Planned total follow-up duration of 5 years

    Molecular response was assessed using BCR-ABL transcript levels measured by realtime quantitative polymerase chain reaction. MMR is defined as a ratio BCR-ABL/ABL ≤0.1% on the international scale (ie, at least 3 log reduction from a standardized baseline value).

  3. Time to Confirmed Complete Cytogenic Response (cCCyR) Overall

    Time frame: Day 1 to 5 years

    The time to cCCyR for all randomized participants is defined as the time from the randomization date until criteria are first met for complete cytogenic response (provided it is confirmed later). The time to cCCyR analysis censors nonresponders who do not progress at their last cytogenetic assessments and nonresponders who progress at the maximum time of all randomized participants.

    .

  4. Time to Major Molecular Response (MMR) Overall

    Time frame: Day 1 to 5 years

    The time to MMR for all randomized participants is defined as the time from randomization date until measurement criteria are first met for MMR. The time to MMR analysis censors nonresponders who do not progress at their last molecular assessments and nonresponders who progress at the maximum time of all randomized participants.

  5. Percentage of Participants With Progression-free Survival (PFS)

    Time frame: Participants were followed-up for at least 5 years

    PFS was defined as the time from randomization until progression (any progression/death within 30 days of last dosing date, or between 30-60 days of last dosing prior to start of secondary therapy). Those who did not progress/die or who progressed/died after 60 days of last dose were censored at last on-study hematologic/cytogenetic assessment; those with progression/death 30-60 days of last dosing date and after start date of secondary therapy censored at last on-study hematologic/cytogenetic assessment prior to start of secondary therapy; those who had not received study treatment censored on date randomized.

  6. Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS)

    Time frame: Participants were followed-up for at least 5 years

    OS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death. If the participant had not died, survival was censored on last date the participant was known to be alive.

Other outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Drug-related AEs, Drug-related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Drug-related AEs Leading to Discontinuation, and All Deaths

    Time frame: From date of last person, first visit to date of last person, last visit (approximately 8 years)

    AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition in a subject administered an investigational (medicinal) product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an important medical event.

  2. Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Abnormalities in On-study Laboratory Test Results

    Time frame: From date of last person, first visit to date of last person, last visit (approximately 8 years)

    ULN=upper limit of normal. Grade 3=Severe AE; Grade 4=Life-threatening or disabling AE. Absolute neutrophil count: Grade 3 <1000-500/mm^3; Grade 4 <500/mm^3. Hemoglobin: Grade 3 <8.0-6.5 g/dL; Grade 4 <6.5 g/dL. Platelets: Grade 3 <50,000-25,000/mm^3; Grade 4 <25,000/mm^3. ALT/AST: Grade 3 >5.0-20*ULN; Grade 4 >20*ULN. Total bilirubin: Grade 3 >3-10*ULN; Grade 4 >10*ULN. Sample normal ranges (may vary by institution): ALT, Female: 7-30 U/L, Male: 10-55 U/L; AST, Female: 9-25 U/L, Male10-40 U/L; Total bilirubin: 0.0-1.0 mg/dL. Creatinine: Grade 3 >3.0-6.0*ULN; Grade 4 >6.0*ULN. Phosphate: Grade 3 <2.0-1.0 mg/dL; Grade 4 <1.0 mg/dL. Calcium: Grade 3 <7.0-6.0 mg/dL; Grade 4 <6.0 mg/dL. Potassium: Grade 3 <3.0-2.5 mmol/L; Grade 4 <2.5 mmol/L.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

An Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter Phase III Trial of Dasatinib (SPRYCEL®) vs. Standard Dose Imatinib (400 mg) in the Treatment of Subjects With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Acronym: DASISION

Important dates

Study start
2007
Primary completion
2009
Study completion
2015
First posted
Jun 1, 2007
Registry last updated
Feb 15, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.