Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03921411

A Pharmacokinetics and Safety Study of Nemolizumab in Adolescent Participants With Atopic Dermatitis (AD)

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of nemolizumab in adolescent participants with AD.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

12 year–17 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Galderma Investigational Site, Fountain Valley, California, United States

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Key Inclusion Criteria

  • Male or female participants ≥ 12 to < 17 years of age
  • Chronic AD that has been documented for at least 2 years
  • Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score ≥ 16
  • Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score ≥ 3
  • AD involvement ≥ 10% of Body Surface Area (BSA)
  • Documented recent history of inadequate response to topical medications
  • Women of childbearing potential must agree to be strictly abstinent or to use an effective and approved method of contraception throughout the study and for 12 weeks after the last study drug injection.

Key Exclusion Criteria

  • Body weight < 30 kilogram (kg)
  • Cutaneous infection within 1 week or any infection requiring treatment with oral or parenteral antibiotics, antivirals, antiparasitics, or antifungals within 1 week
  • History of hypersensitivity (including anaphylaxis) to an immunoglobulin product (plasma-derived or recombinant, example., monoclonal antibody)
  • Any medical or psychological condition, or any clinically relevant laboratory abnormalities that may have put the subject at significant risk according to the investigator's judgment

Treatment and study plan

Nemolizumab

Biological

Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of 30 milligram (mg) of Nemolizumab every 4 weeks (Q4W) over a 16-week treatment period, with a loading dose of 60 mg on Day 1.

Primary outcomes

  1. Nemolizumab Serum Concentrations at Week 1-2

    Time frame: At week 1-2

    Serum concentrations of Nemolizumab were analyzed using validated enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

  2. Nemolizumab Serum Concentrations at Week 4

    Time frame: At week 4

    Serum concentrations of Nemolizumab were analyzed using validated enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

  3. Nemolizumab Serum Concentrations at Week 8

    Time frame: At week 8

    Serum concentrations of Nemolizumab were analyzed using validated enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

  4. Nemolizumab Serum Concentrations at Week 12

    Time frame: At week 12

    Serum concentrations of Nemolizumab were analyzed using validated enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

  5. Nemolizumab Serum Concentrations at Week 16

    Time frame: At week 16

    Serum concentrations of Nemolizumab were analyzed using validated enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

  6. Nemolizumab Serum Concentrations at Week 24

    Time frame: At week 24

    Serum concentrations of Nemolizumab were analyzed using validated enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

  7. Apparent Clearance After Extravascular Administration (Cl/F) of Nemolizumab

    Time frame: Baseline to week 24

    CL/F is apparent clearance of the drug from the serum, calculated as the drug dose divided area under the curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time [AUC (0-inf)].

  8. Apparent Volume of Distribution After Extravascular Administration (Vd/F) of Nemolizumab

    Time frame: Baseline to week 24

    Vd/F was calculated as dose divided by lambda_z *AUC(0-inf).

  9. Population Lag Time (Tlag)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 24

    Lag time is defined as the time taken for a drug to appear in the systemic circulation following administration. The population Tlag value was estimated for the overall population and was reported in this endpoint.

  10. First Order Constant of Absorption (ka)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 24

    PK of Nemolizumab was evaluated in participants using Ka using PK samples collected on Weeks 1-2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24. Ka was evaluated by population PK (popPK) methods and mean and standard from the model has been tabulated.

  11. Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Nemolizumab

    Time frame: Baseline to week 12

    Cmax was obtained from serum concentration time curve.

  12. Time to Reach Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Tmax) of Nemolizumab

    Time frame: Baseline to week 12

    Time to reach maximum observed serum concentration (Tmax) for Nemolizumab was derived from serum concentrations versus time data.

  13. Trough Serum Concentration (Ctrough) of Nemolizumab at Week 4

    Time frame: At week 4

    Ctrough is the concentration prior to study drug administration.

  14. Trough Serum Concentration (Ctrough) of Nemolizumab at Week 8

    Time frame: At week 8

    Ctrough is the concentration prior to study drug administration.

  15. Trough Serum Concentration (Ctrough) of Nemolizumab at Week 12

    Time frame: At week 12

    Ctrough is the concentration prior to study drug administration.

  16. Trough Serum Concentration (Ctrough) of Nemolizumab at Week 16

    Time frame: At week 16

    Ctrough is the concentration prior to study drug administration.

  17. Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Zero to 4 Week Post-dose (AUC0-4w)

    Time frame: Pre-dose through 4 weeks post-dose

    Area under the drug concentration-time curve from 0 to 4 week post dosing for Nemolizumab. AUC(0-4w) was calculated according to the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule.

  18. Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 8 Week Post-dose (AUC0-8w)

    Time frame: Pre-dose through 8 weeks post-dose

    Area under the drug concentration-time curve from 0 to 8 week post dosing for Nemolizumab. AUC(0-8w) was calculated according to the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule.

  19. Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Week Post-dose (AUC0-12w)

    Time frame: Pre-dose through 12 week post-dose

    Area under the drug concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 week post dosing for Nemolizumab. AUC(0-12w) was calculated according to the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule.

  20. Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 16 Week Post-dose (AUC0-16w)

    Time frame: Pre-dose through 16 weeks post-dose

    Area under the drug concentration-time curve from 0 to 16 week post dosing for Nemolizumab. AUC(0-16w) was calculated according to the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule.

  21. Apparent Terminal Half-life (t1/2)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 24

    Apparent Terminal Half-life (t1/2) is the time required for a given drug concentration in the serum to decrease by 50%.

  22. Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) in Serum at Week 4

    Time frame: At week 4

    Antidrug antibodies were determined using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) assay. Number of participants with positive ADA in Serum were reported.

  23. Number of Participants With Neutralizing Antibodies

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24

    The number of participants with neutralizing antibodies response at time of baseline up to week 24 has been presented. Neutralizing antibodies response assay result have been only presented for participants with positive anti-drug antibody assay.

  24. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event of Special Interests (AESI) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    Time frame: Baseline through week 24

    An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAEs is any AE that resulted in death, life threatening, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect in offspring of a study participant, is an important medical event that may jeopardize the participant or may require medical intervention. TEAE was defined as AEs starting/worsening after first intake of the study drug. TEAEs included both Serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. An AESI is a noteworthy event for study drug that should be monitored closely and reported immediately. The following AEs will be considered AESIs: Anaphylactic reactions, Acute allergic reactions requiring treatment, Severe injection site reaction, Newly-diagnosed asthma or worsening of asthma, Peripheral edema: limbs, bilateral and Facial edema.

  25. Number of Participants With Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score Less Than or Equal to (=<) 19 at Week 1-2

    Time frame: At week 1-2

    The ACT is a participant-completed assessment consisting of 5 questions health survey for measuring asthma control. Each question is answered with a score in a range of 1 to 5 and lower score represents the more severe condition. The scale range for Question 1 is "all the time" (1) to "none of the time" (5); Question 2 range: "more than once a day" (1) to "not at all" (5); Question 3 range: "4 or more nights a week" (1) to "not at all" (5); Question 4 range: "3 or more times per day" (1) to "not at all" (5); Question 5 range: "not controlled at all" (1) to "completely controlled" (5). A total ACT score is obtained as the sum of the 5 individual question scores that is from 5 to 25, where Higher scores mean that asthma is more controlled.

  26. Number of Participants With Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score Less Than or Equal to (=<) 19 at Week 4

    Time frame: At week 4

    The ACT is a participant-completed assessment consisting of 5 questions health survey for measuring asthma control. Each question is answered with a score in a range of 1 to 5 and lower score represents the more severe condition. The scale range for Question 1 is "all the time" (1) to "none of the time" (5); Question 2 range: "more than once a day" (1) to "not at all" (5); Question 3 range: "4 or more nights a week" (1) to "not at all" (5); Question 4 range: "3 or more times per day" (1) to "not at all" (5); Question 5 range: "not controlled at all" (1) to "completely controlled" (5). A total ACT score is obtained as the sum of the 5 individual question scores that is from 5 to 25, where Higher scores mean that asthma is more controlled.

  27. Number of Participants With Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score Less Than or Equal to (=<) 19 at Week 8

    Time frame: At week 8

    The ACT is a participant-completed assessment consisting of 5 questions health survey for measuring asthma control. Each question is answered with a score in a range of 1 to 5 and lower score represents the more severe condition. The scale range for Question 1 is "all the time" (1) to "none of the time" (5); Question 2 range: "more than once a day" (1) to "not at all" (5); Question 3 range: "4 or more nights a week" (1) to "not at all" (5); Question 4 range: "3 or more times per day" (1) to "not at all" (5); Question 5 range: "not controlled at all" (1) to "completely controlled" (5). A total ACT score is obtained as the sum of the 5 individual question scores that is from 5 to 25, where Higher scores mean that asthma is more controlled.

  28. Number of Participants With Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score Less Than or Equal to (=<) 19 at Week 12

    Time frame: At week 12

    The ACT is a participant-completed assessment consisting of 5 questions health survey for measuring asthma control. Each question is answered with a score in a range of 1 to 5 and lower score represents the more severe condition. The scale range for Question 1 is "all the time" (1) to "none of the time" (5); Question 2 range: "more than once a day" (1) to "not at all" (5); Question 3 range: "4 or more nights a week" (1) to "not at all" (5); Question 4 range: "3 or more times per day" (1) to "not at all" (5); Question 5 range: "not controlled at all" (1) to "completely controlled" (5). A total ACT score is obtained as the sum of the 5 individual question scores that is from 5 to 25, where Higher scores mean that asthma is more controlled.

  29. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Physical Examination (PE) Findings

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24

    A complete PE included assessments of the head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck (including thyroid), skin/integumentary system, cardiovascular system, respiratory system, gastrointestinal system, musculoskeletal system, lymph nodes, and nervous system. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator.

  30. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Laboratory Values

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24

    Laboratory investigation included hematology, biochemistry, and urinalysis. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically significant abnormalities in laboratory parameters were reported.

  31. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings at Week 16

    Time frame: At week 16

    The ECG recordings were obtained after 10 minutes of rest in a semi-supine position. Number of participants with clinically significant change from baseline in ECG findings were reported. Clinically significance was decided by investigator.

  32. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24

    Vital signs included pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (after the participant had been sitting for at least 5 minutes), and body temperature. Clinically significance was decided by investigator..

  33. Number of Participants With Abnormal Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) <80% of Predicted Value at Week 1-2

    Time frame: At week 1-2

    PEF was the maximum speed of expiration measured using spirometer. A participant took rest just before the measurement. At each time of measurement, a participant expired for at least 6 seconds wherever possible. At each time of measurement, at least 3 readings were obtained, and three readings which were obtained in an appropriate manner were stored. PEF <80% of predictive value is considered as abnormal.

  34. Number of Participants With Abnormal Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) <80% Predicted Value at Week 4

    Time frame: At week 4

    PEF was the maximum speed of expiration measured using spirometer. A participant took rest just before the measurement. At each time of measurement, a participant expired for at least 6 seconds wherever possible. At each time of measurement, at least 3 readings were obtained, and three readings which were obtained in an appropriate manner were stored. PEF <80% of predictive value is considered as abnormal.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Non-Compartmental Analysis: Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 4 Weeks Post-dose AUC(0-4w)

    Time frame: Pre-dose through 4 weeks post-dose

    Area under the drug concentration-time curve from 0 to 4 week post dosing for Nemolizumab. AUC(0-4w) was calculated according to the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule.

  2. Non-Compartmental Analysis: Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 8 Week Post-dose (AUC0-8w)

    Time frame: Pre-dose through 8 weeks post-dose

    Area under the drug concentration-time curve from 0 to 8 week post dosing for Nemolizumab. AUC(0-8w) was calculated according to the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule.

  3. Non-Compartmental Analysis: Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Week Post-dose (AUC0-12w)

    Time frame: Pre-dose through 12 week post-dose

    Area under the drug concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 week post dosing for Nemolizumab. AUC(0-12w) was calculated according to the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule

  4. Non-Compartmental Analysis: Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 16 Week Post-dose (AUC0-16w)

    Time frame: Pre-dose through 16 weeks post-dose

    Area under the drug concentration-time curve from 0 to 16 week post dosing for Nemolizumab. AUC(0-16w) was calculated according to the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule.

  5. Absolute Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 16

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

    EASI assesses severity and extent of atopic dermatitis (AD) signs through a composite score of erythema, induration/population, excoriation, and lichenification. Each characteristic was assessed for severity on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) for each of the 4 body areas: head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. The total EASI score range from 0 to 72 with higher scores representing greater severity of AD.

  6. Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 16

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

    EASI assesses severity and extent of AD signs through a composite score of erythema, induration/population, excoriation, and lichenification. Each characteristic was assessed for severity on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) for each of the 4 body areas: head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. The EASI score can range from 0 to 72 with higher scores representing greater severity of AD.

  7. Number of Participants Who Achieved Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Success (Defined as IGA 0 [Clear] or 1 [Almost Clear]) From Baseline to Week 16

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 16

    IGA is a 5-point scale used by the investigator or trained designee to evaluate the global severity of AD. Ranging from (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe), where higher score indicated higher severity. IGA success is defined as participants with 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) and at least 2 -grade improvement from baseline. Number of Participants who achieved Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Success from baseline to week 16 were reported.

  8. Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement by Atopic Dermatitis (AD) at Each Visit up to Week 24

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 1-2, 4, 8, 12, 14, 16 and 24

    BSA affected by AD was assessed for each section of the body (the possible highest score for each region was: head and neck [9%], anterior trunk [18%], back [18%], upper limbs [18%], lower limbs [36%], and genitals [1%]) and reported as a percentage of all major body sections combined. The reported percentage of BSA was combined percentage of all major body sections.

  9. Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

    Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]), higher scores indicated greater severity.

  10. Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

    Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]), higher scores indicated greater severity.

  11. Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

    Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]), higher scores indicated greater severity.

  12. Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

    Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]), higher scores indicated greater severity.

  13. Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average Sleep Disturbance Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

    The sleep disturbance NRS is a scale used by the participants to report the degree of their sleep loss related to AD. Participants were asked the following questions in their local language: how would you rate your sleep last night? On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no sleep loss related to signs/symptoms of AD' and 10 being 'I cannot sleep at all due to the signs/symptoms of AD'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.

  14. Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average Sleep Disturbance Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

    The sleep disturbance NRS is a scale used by the participants to report the degree of their sleep loss related to AD. Participants were asked the following questions in their local language: how would you rate your sleep last night? On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no sleep loss related to signs/symptoms of AD' and 10 being 'I cannot sleep at all due to the signs/symptoms of AD'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.

  15. Percent Change From Baseline in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score at Week 16

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

    Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) is a validated measure commonly used to assess the severity and the extent of AD signs and symptoms. SCORAD is a clinical tool for assessing the severity and the extent of AD signs and symptoms. Extent and intensity of six types of basic lesions (erythema/darkening, edema/papule, oozing/crusting, excoriation, lichenification/prurigo and dryness) and symptoms (itching and loss of sleep) were assessed and scored. Total score ranges from 0 (absent disease) to 103 (severe disease).

  16. Number of Topical Atopic Dermatitis Medication-Free Days Through Week 24

    Time frame: Baseline through Week 24

    Number of topical AD medication-free days through Week 16 was calculated as the number of days that a participant used neither topical corticosteroid (TCS)/ topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI) nor system rescue therapy divided by the study days.

  17. Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) For Participants > 16 Years of Age at Baseline and Week 16

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

    The DLQI is a validated 10-item questionnaire covering domains including symptoms/feelings, daily activities, leisure, work/school, personal relationships, and treatment. The participants were rate each question ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much) and overall score ranges from 0 to 30. A higher total score indicates a poorer quality of life (QoL).

  18. Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (cDLQI) For Participants 12-16 Years of Age at Baseline and Week 16

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

    The DLQI is a validated 10-item questionnaire covering domains including symptoms/feelings, daily activities, leisure, work/school, personal relationships, and treatment. The participants were rate each question ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much) and overall score ranges from 0 to 30. A higher total score indicates a poorer quality of life (QoL).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Galderma R&D

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Group Clinical Trial to Assess the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Nemolizumab (CD14152) in Adolescent Subjects (12-17 Years) With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Apr 19, 2019
Registry last updated
Apr 21, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.