Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02405208

A Multi-center Outcomes Clinical Study of the PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder Implant in Humeral Head Resurfacing

This study is designed as a multi-center, nonrandomized, uncontrolled, unblinded, prospective clinical outcomes investigation to evaluate the short, mid and long term performance of the PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder prosthesis humeral replacement.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

21 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Brisbane Hand & Upper Limb Clinic, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This study is designed as a multi-center, nonrandomized, uncontrolled, unblinded, prospective clinical outcomes investigation to evaluate the short, mid and long term performance of the PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder prosthesis humeral replacement. The PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder prosthesis device configuration will include humeral resurfacing CAP without cement. Patients will be selected for recruitment into the study based upon the normally accepted criteria for primary shoulder resurfacing arthroplasty.

The investigation will be conducted by up to 10 International surgeons experienced in HRA. 387 subjects with PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder prosthesis arthroplasties will be implanted and followed for 10 years.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients selected for inclusion will present for primary shoulder surface replacement or arthroplasty with any of the following diagnoses:
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Rheumatoid / Inflammatory Arthritis
  • Post-traumatic arthritis.
  • Focal and large (Hill-Sachs) osteochondral defects.
  • Subject is able to or capable of providing consent to participate in the clinical investigation.
  • Subject agrees to comply with this protocol, including participating in required follow-up visits at the investigations site and completing study questionnaires.
  • Subject is at least 21 years of age and skeletally mature at the time of surgery.

Exclusion criteria

  • Have destruction of the proximal humerus to preclude rigid fixation of the humeral component.
  • Insufficient bone quality as determined by intra-operative evaluation.
  • Have arthritis with defective rotator cuff.
  • Have had a failed rotator cuff surgery.
  • Have loss of musculature, neuromuscular compromise or vascular deficiency in the affected limb rendering the procedure unjustified.
  • Have evidence of active infection.
  • Present with a condition of neuromuscular compromise of the shoulder (e.g., neuropathic joints or brachioplexis injury with a flail shoulder joint).
  • Are unwilling or unable to comply with a rehabilitation program or would fail to return for the postoperative follow-up visits prescribed by the protocol.
  • Are skeletally immature.
  • Have a known allergic reaction to pyrocarbon.
  • Have other conditions such as central nervous system disturbances, alcohol or drug addiction, etc. that may make effective evaluation of the joint replacement difficult or impossible.
  • Are currently participating in another clinical study.
  • Have known, active metastatic or neoplastic disease.
  • Are taking > 10mg/day corticosteroids (e.g. prednisone) excluding inhalers, within 3 months prior to surgery.
  • Are under 21 years of age or over 75.

.

  • Require glenoid replacement (Glenoid Classification).

Treatment and study plan

PyroTITAN HRA

Device

Humeral resurfacing using the PyroTITAN HRA device

Primary outcomes

  1. Device Survival

    Time frame: up to 117 months

    Clinical success was determined by the percentage of shoulders with device survival. Survival of the device was measured by the Kaplan-Meier survival estimate with survival defined as all the following:

    • Device remained implanted
    • Absence of device-related complications requiring surgical replacement, removal, or augmentation of components
    • Freedom from chronic dislocation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Radiographic Success

    Time frame: 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 8 years and 10 years

    Radiographic success determined by:

    • No evidence of device failure, specifically progressive migration or implant loosening
    • Anatomic alignment is a criterion that may be included in the definition of success in some investigations
  2. ASES Score

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 8 years, and 10 years

    The ASES Shoulder Score is a functional outcome tool that has been validated for various shoulder conditions. ASES score ranges from 0 to 100, with a score of 0 indicating a worse shoulder condition and 100 indicating the best shoulder condition.

  3. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 8 years, and 10 years

    The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score ranges from 0 to 100, with 0 representing no pain (i.e., the best outcome) and 100 representing the worst possible pain (i.e., the worst outcome).

  4. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Satisfaction Score

    Time frame: 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 8 years, and 10 years

    Patient satisfaction determined by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Satisfaction score. VAS Satisfaction scores range from 0 to 100, with 0 representing the lowest level of satisfaction (i.e., the worst possible outcome) and 100 representing the highest level of satisfaction (i.e., the best possible outcome).

  5. The Western Ontario of the Shoulder Index (WOOS) Score

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 8 years, and 10 years

    The WOOS Score is a quality of life questionnaire that has been validated for various shoulder conditions. WOOS total score ranges from 0 to 100, with 0 representing the best shoulder condition and 100 representing the worst shoulder condition.

  6. Constant-Murley (CM) Score

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 8 years, and 10 years

    The Constant-Murley (CM) Score is a commonly used score of shoulder function. CM scores range from 0 to 100, with a score of 0 indicating a worse shoulder function (i.e., worst outcome) and 100 indicating the best shoulder function (i.e., best outcome).

  7. EQ-5D-3L Quality of Life Score

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 8 years, and 10 years

    The EuroQol 5-Dimension 3-Level (EQ-5D-3L) Quality of Life Score ranges on a scale of 0 to 1, with 0 indicating a worse health condition (i.e., worst outcome) and 1 indicating the best health condition (i.e., best outcome).

  8. EQ-5D-3L VAS Score

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 8 years, and 10 years

    The EuroQol 5-Dimension 3-Level (EQ-5D-3L) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score ranges on a scale of 0 to 100, with 0 indicating a worse health condition (i.e., worst outcome) and 100 indicating the best health condition (i.e., best outcome).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Smith & Nephew, Inc.

Industry

Registry information

Acronym: CHRA

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Apr 1, 2015
Registry last updated
Dec 24, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.