Ambulatory Care Center
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
NCT Number: NCT01998269
The study objective is to develop and test a Measure of Drug Self-Management for use in clinical settings among patients with hypertension and diabetes.
While medication non-adherence is a highly recognized public health and patient safety concern, it is rarely assessed in a routine and consistent manner in clinical settings. With the aging of the US population and rising rates of chronic disease, an increasing number of adults are being prescribed multi-drug regimens that require greater self-management skills. Despite the complexity of medication use, adherence has most commonly been measured as a limited set of behaviors (i.e., filling a prescription, taking doses). This emphasis has, over time, simplified how we think of prescription (Rx) medication use and directed attention away from the full range of tasks associated with effective Rx self-management. The field of health literacy research has deconstructed these tasks in considerable detail in recent years, and can offer insight into a more comprehensive measurement of patients' outpatient Rx use.
There is a clear need for a brief, yet inclusive, measure of adherence that can be used in clinical settings to routinely assess patients' use of complex Rx regimens. Such an assessment could be used to guide clinicians in addressing specific patient challenges to safe and appropriate medication use. In response to this need, our study proposes to develop a new assessment of medication self-management. This unique measure will utilize health literacy best practices to promote patient comprehension and ease-of-use; it will also be tailored to patients' actual regimens via electronic health record (EHR) data. Finally, the tool will be available in both English and Spanish to support use among diverse patient populations. Our study aims are to:
1. Develop and refine a Measure of Drug Self-Management (MeDS) prototype. 2. Inform the content, structure and delivery of the MeDS through targeted discussions with patients, providers and information technology specialists. 3. Test the reliability and validity of the MeDS among patients with diabetes and hypertension
H1: The MeDS will strongly correlate with other self-report adherence measures.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: cross-sectional, 1 hour interview after clinic visit
The MeDS is an assessment of medication self-management skills. The MeDS tool has 14 questions, the minimum score is 0 (poor medication self-management skills) and the maximum score is 14 (adequate self-management skills). The internal consistency of the scale is .72 (cronbach's alpha), which is considered adequate internal consistency. The MeDS was compared to The Morisky Medication Adherence Scale is one of the most commonly used assessments of medication adherence. It includes 8 questions that assess various factors that can affect medication use, such as forgetfulness, busyness and side effects. Scores range from 0 to 8, with lower scores reflecting better adherence.
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Other
A Mixed Methods Approach to the Development and Testing of the Measure of Drug Self-Management (MeDS), an Assessment for Use in Clinical Settings Among English and Spanish-speaking Patients With Hypertension and Diabetes.
Acronym: MeDS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00837122
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes
Accra, Ghana
View Trial DetailsNCT05565716
Cardiovascular Diseases, Chronic Disease
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07532564
Anemia, Anemia, Hemolytic
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04286555
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details