Department of Anesthesia, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510655, China
NCT Number: NCT06443697
Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) can lead to serious postoperative complications, but most symptoms are mild. Clinically important PONV (CIPONV) refers to PONV symptoms that have a significant impact on the patient's well-being and recovery. Present predictive systems for PONV are mainly concentrated on early PONV. However, there is currently no suitable prediction model for delayed PONV, particularly delayed CI-PONV. This study aims to develop and validate a prediction model for delayed CI-PONV using machine learning algorithms utilizing perioperative data from patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery.
All 1154 patients in the FDP-PONV trial will be enrolled in this study. Delayed CIPONV is defined as experiencing CIPONV between 25-120 hours after surgery. After selecting the modeling variables from 81 perioperative clinical features, six machine learning models are established to generate the risk prediction models for delayed CIPONV. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, F1 score and Brier score are used to evaluate the model performance. Shape Additive explanation analysis was conducted to evaluate feature importance.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Observational
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510655, China
The website https://mvansmeden.shinyapps.io/BeyondEPV/ was used for sample size calculation, considering 6 candidate predictors, an event fraction of 0.14, and a criterion value for reduced mean predictive squared error of 0.03. The calculated sample size is 1080, with a minimally required expected event per variable of 25.1. Therefore, a sample size of 1154 patients is deemed sufficient to support the inclusion of 6 predictors in the development of the predictive model.
A total of 81 variables, including demographics, comorbidities, laboratory findings, as well as information related to anesthesia and surgery, are prospectively collected in the FDP-PONV trial and considered as potential predictive factors in this study. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method is used to identify clinically significant variables. Further selection of the final predictors is performed using stepwise regression based on the Akaike Information Criterion.
The entire dataset is randomly divided into a training set and a validation set in a ratio of 7:3. Six machine learning models, namely logistic regression, random, extreme gradient boosting, k-nearest neighbor, gradient boosting decision, and multi-layer perceptron, were developed to create risk prediction models for delayed CIPONV. The performance of the models is assessed by comparing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, F1 score, Brier score and calibration curve. Bootstrap resamples is conducted 1000 times on the training cohort to evaluate the predictive model's performance. Decision curve analysis is conducted to assess the clinical applicability of the model. The SHapley Additive Explanations library (SHAP) is used to interpret the prediction model.
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
a) age between 18 and 75 years, b) having 3 or 4 Apfel risk factors, and c) scheduled to undergo laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgical procedures under general anesthesia.
Exclusion criteria
a) American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status greater than 3, b) severe hepatic dysfunction, c) contraindications to fosaprepitant, 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, or dexamethasone, d) preoperative use of medications known to have antiemetic properties, e) presence of mental disorders or inability to communicate, and f) pregnant or nursing women.
This is a secondary analysis and no intervention is implemented.
Time frame: Every 24 hours after surgery (at 2-day, 3-day, 4-day and 5-day)
A postoperative nausea and vomiting severity score of ≥ 5 based on the simplified postoperative nausea and vomiting impact scoring system, assessed between 25 and 120 hours after surgery.
Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
Other
A Machine Learning-based Prediction Model for Delayed Clinically Important Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in High-risk Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06546514
Anxiety Disorders, Mental Disorders
Erzurum, Palandöken, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05676294
Nausea, Pathologic Processes
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07688811
Anesthesia Complication, Nausea
Jakarta Pusat, Jakarta Special Capital Region, Indonesia
View Trial DetailsNCT07242209
Menstrual Cycle, Nausea
Sakarya, Serdivan, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details