Texas Children's Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
NCT Number: NCT02352519
In this research study, the investigators are trying to find out which of the two methods of injecting local anesthetics (at the site of the belly button cut or by ultrasound guided rectus sheath block) will provide better pain relief and less need for pain medication after surgery in children undergoing single incision laparoscopic appendectomy.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me6 year–17 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Laparoscopic appendectomy is a common procedure in pediatric surgery. For single incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA), the laparoscope and other instruments are inserted with the aid of a large trocar through a single umbilical incision. Laparoscopic appendectomy via a single umbilical incision is a less invasive procedure associated with minimal or no scarring compared to the traditional laparoscopic operation. Postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting are common problems encountered with laparoscopic appendectomy and other abdominal operations. As an established standard practice at Texas Children's Hospital, pain control in these patients is achieved by intravenous opioids via a patient controlled device along with ketorolac tromethamine, as well as local anesthetic infiltration (LAI) performed by surgeon or bilateral rectus sheath blocks as described below.
The umbilical area is innervated by the bilateral 9th, 10th and 11th intercostal nerves, which run between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscle. At the lateral edge of the rectus muscle, the nerves perforate the rectus sheath and innervate the rectus muscle. Anterior cutaneous branches cross the muscle supplying the skin of the umbilical area. Successful blockade of the relevant intercostal nerves within the rectus sheath can provide effective pain relief for umbilical and other midline surgical incisions. Rectus sheath block has also been shown to give better pain control when compared with intra-incisional infiltration and intra-peritoneal injection in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. Recently, it has been shown that there is improved efficacy and a decreased local anesthetic requirement when ultrasound is used to guide rectus sheath block in children undergoing umbilical hernia repair. However, data comparing pain after ultrasound guided bilateral rectus sheath block (UGBRSB) and peri-umbilical local anesthetic infiltration (LAI) for SILA are not available. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is high after laparoscopic surgery, with a dose-related increase noted when opioids are used in the postoperative period. Effective regional anesthesia may decrease opioids use and consequently reduce the incidence of PONV and improve patient satisfaction.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Under sterile conditions,the posterior rectus sheath will be identified by ultrasound, and an insulated 22 gauge 50 mm needle inserted till the tip is seen to be directly between the rectus abdominis muscle and the posterior rectus sheath. Bupivacaine 0.25% (0.2 ml/kg with maximum 5 ml in each side) will be injected observing the spread on the ultrasound image.
Other names: Ultrasound Guided Bilateral Rectus Sheath Block
In those patients randomized to the LAI group, the surgeon will perform infiltration of 0.5 ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine (maximum, 10 ml) around the incision
Other names: Local Anesthetic Infiltration
Time frame: 48 hours
Time frame: 48 hours
Time frame: 48 hours
Time frame: 48 hours
Time frame: 48 hours
Time frame: 48 hours
Time frame: 48 hours
Time frame: 48 hours
Baylor College of Medicine
Other
A Randomized Comparison of Ultrasound Guided Bilateral Rectus Sheath Block and Local Anesthetic Infiltration for Postoperative Pain Control in Children With Acute Appendicitis
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05002829
Appendicitis, Cecal Diseases
Denver, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05887414
Appendicitis, Cecal Diseases
Baldwin Park, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05209061
Appendicitis, Cecal Diseases
Copenhagen, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT04986397
Appendicitis, Cecal Diseases
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details