Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00224224

A Comparison of Primary Care and Traditional Internal Medicine Residents

The goal of this study is to identify objective differences between primary care and traditional medicine residents in clinical performance, continuity of care and utilization of resources. Specifically, this retrospective study will analyze the database collected by CLIMACS, the computer system at Cornell Internal Medicine Associates (CIMA). This system is used for clinical and administrative purposes; it manages and tracks patient's information and demographics, appointment booking, clinical diagnosis, prescriptions and medications, laboratory and radiology test, and consults. In our study, we will analyze a subset of the CLIMACS database from previous years.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

21 year–64 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Medical College

New York, 10065, United States

About this study

Three areas will be examined:

  • Clinical performance
  • Continuity of care
  • Utilization of resources

Clinical performance will be assessed using Health Plan Employer data and Information Set (HEDIS) performance standards. These standards were developed for the purposes of quality assessment, and in our study we will examine the following HEDIS standards:

  • Breast Cancer Screening- the proportion of women between the ages of 52 and 64 who have had a mammogram within a two year period.
  • Cervical Cancer Screening- the proportion of women between the ages of 21 and 64 who had a Pap test in the preceding 3 years.
  • Cholesterol Screening- the proportion of patients ages 20 to 39 and 40-59 who have had their cholesterol tested at least once in the past five years.
  • Asthma admission rate- the proportion of asthmatics admitted to the hospital for the care of asthma per year.
  • Diabetic Standards-
  • Admission for cellulitis/ 1000 diabetics per year.
  • Admission for diabetes/ 1000 diabetics per year.
  • Inpatient days per 100 diabetics per year.
  • Prevalence of ischemic heart disease.
  • Prevalence of severe renal disease.
  • Diabetics with >2 hemoglobin A1C drawn per year.

Continuity of Care will be assessed by 3 different indicators:

  • The proportion of visits that are made to the designated primary care provider of the number of visits made.
  • The proportion of missed appointments of the total number of appointments.
  • The proportion of walk in visits of the total number of appointments.

Resource utilization will be assessed by examining the following:

  • Number of lab test per year per patient.
  • Number of specialty consults per year per patient.
  • Hospital admission rates per patient per year.
  • Cost to medications. Confidentiality will be maintained throughout the study. In clinical practice access to CLIMACS is limited to the medical providers and administrators by individuals access codes. Furthermore, our study will remove specific identifiers to maintain the anonymity of both the patients and residents.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients who are followed as outpatients by a Cornell affiliated internist at the Cornell Internal Medicine Associates (CIMA).
  • Patients at New York Hospital who may or may not go on to be followed as outpatients at CIMA.

Exclusion criteria

Patients who elect not to participate in the study.

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. To identify the differences between primary care and traditional medicine residents in clinical performance, continuity of care and utilization of resources.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
1995
Study completion
2005
First posted
Sep 22, 2005
Registry last updated
Apr 3, 2008

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.