Medipol Mega University Hospital
Istanbul, 34214, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT06939699
This randomized controlled study evaluated a social media-based educational program for women who had not previously participated in breast, cervical, or colorectal cancer screening. A total of 132 women aged 30-70 years were assigned to either a social media-based education group or a standard online education group.
The social media-based program was structured according to the Social Ecological Model and delivered through closed WhatsApp and Instagram groups. The standard education group received two online educational sessions via Zoom.
The study evaluated three primary outcomes: knowledge regarding cancer screenings, attitudes toward cancer screening, and self-reported digital health literacy. These outcomes were measured before the assigned educational program and four weeks after its completion. The study did not measure actual participation in cancer screening.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me30 year–70 year
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Istanbul, 34214, Turkey (Türkiye)
This study was conducted as a two-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of a Social Ecological Model-based social media educational program on women's knowledge and attitudes regarding cancer screenings and their self-reported digital health literacy.
The study included 132 women aged 30-70 years who had not previously undergone breast, cervical, or colorectal cancer screening and who met the other eligibility criteria. Participants completed baseline assessments before group assignment and were allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the experimental group or the active comparator group.
The experimental group received a structured educational program through closed WhatsApp and Instagram groups. During the eight-week program, 53 visual educational posters were shared. The content addressed breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer epidemiology, risk factors, symptoms, screening methods, national screening recommendations, healthy lifestyle behaviors, access to screening services, and digital health literacy. Following the scheduled poster-sharing period, four short reinforcement videos were provided. The intervention therefore comprised a total of 57 educational materials.
The active comparator group received two standardized online educational sessions via Zoom, delivered one week apart. Each session lasted approximately 45-60 minutes. The sessions covered breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screenings, digital health literacy, and the use of digital health services such as e-Nabız and the Central Physician Appointment System (MHRS). Participants were allowed to ask questions during the sessions but did not receive the repeated social media content or continuous group interaction provided to the experimental group.
The three co-primary outcomes were cancer screening knowledge, attitudes toward cancer screening, and self-reported digital health literacy. The outcomes were assessed using validated Turkish measurement instruments at baseline and four weeks after completion of the assigned educational program.
The educational intervention was developed with reference to the individual, interpersonal, institutional/organizational, community, and policy levels of the Social Ecological Model. However, all outcome measures were collected at the individual level. Actual cancer screening participation, health service utilization, and outcomes at the interpersonal, organizational, community, or policy levels were not measured.
The study was approved by the Istanbul Medipol University Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Approval Number: E-10840098-202.3.02-7880). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The intervention consisted of a Social Ecological Model-based educational program delivered through closed WhatsApp and Instagram groups. Fifty-three visual educational posters were shared during the eight-week program. The materials addressed breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer epidemiology, risk factors, symptoms, screening methods, healthy lifestyle behaviors, access to screening services, and digital health literacy. After the scheduled poster-sharing period, four approximately one-minute reinforcement videos covering breast cancer, cervical cancer, colorectal cancer, and digital health literacy were shared. The intervention therefore comprised a total of 57 educational materials.
Other names: Instagram & WhatsApp Infographic Education, WhatsApp and Instagram-Based Cancer Screening Education
Participants received two standardized online educational sessions via Zoom, delivered one week apart. Each session lasted approximately 45-60 minutes. The sessions covered breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screenings, preventive health information, digital health literacy, and the use of digital health services such as e-Nabız and MHRS. Participants were allowed to ask questions during the sessions; however, they did not receive the daily social media posts, repeated digital content, or continuous group interaction provided to the experimental group.
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks after completion of the assigned educational program
Cancer screening knowledge was assessed using the 25-item Cancer Screening Knowledge Scale developed in Turkish. Items are answered as correct, incorrect, or "I do not know." Correct responses are scored as 1, and incorrect or "I do not know" responses are scored as 0. The total score ranges from 0 to 25, with higher scores indicating greater knowledge regarding breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screenings.
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks after completion of the assigned educational program
Attitudes toward cancer screening were assessed using the 24-item Cancer Screening Attitude Scale developed in Turkish. Items are rated on a five-point Likert scale. The total score ranges from 24 to 120, with higher scores indicating a more positive attitude toward cancer screening.
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks after completion of the assigned educational program
Self-reported digital health literacy was assessed using the validated Turkish version of the 18-item Digital Health Literacy Instrument. The instrument includes six dimensions: information searching, evaluating reliability, determining relevance, navigating, adding self-generated content, and protecting privacy. Total and dimension scores are calculated as mean scores ranging from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating higher self-reported digital health literacy.
Emine Ergin
Other
The Effect of Social Media-Based Education on Women's Knowledge, Attitudes, and Health Literacy Regarding Cancer Screenings: A Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02273206
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
The Bronx, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07541105
Breast Cancer Screening, Breast Diseases
View Trial DetailsNCT04471194
Cervical Cancer Screening, Colorectal Cancer Screening
Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04237883
Behavioral Economics, Cervical Cancer Screening
Brentwood, California, United States
View Trial Details