BMN 111
DrugSubcutaneous injection of 15 μg/kg/day and/or 30 μg/kg/day of BMN 111 daily, subject to adjustment per protocol
Other names: Vosoritide, Modified recombinant human C-type natriuretic peptide
NCT Number: NCT03583697
Study 111-206 is a Phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of BMN 111 in infants and young children with a diagnosis of achondroplasia.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeUp to 59 month
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
NOTE: Subjects with prior cervicomedullary decompression may be allowed into Cohort 1 only after discussion and agreement with Medical Monitor.
Inclusion criteria
for Cohort 3 Observation Period
Exclusion criteria
for Cohort 3 Observation Period
Subcutaneous injection of 15 μg/kg/day and/or 30 μg/kg/day of BMN 111 daily, subject to adjustment per protocol
Other names: Vosoritide, Modified recombinant human C-type natriuretic peptide
Subcutaneous injection of 15 μg/kg of placebo daily, Subject to adjustment per protocol
Time frame: Up to Week 56 (Safety Follow-Up +/-7d)
A treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) is any Adverse Events that newly appeared, increased in frequency or worsened in severity following initiation of study drug administration. A severity grade was defined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03. As per CTCAE, Grade 1 scales as Mild; Grade 2 scales as Moderate; Grade 3 scales as severe or medically significant but not immediately life threatening; Grade 4 scales as life-threatening consequences; and Grade 5 scales as death related to AE.
Safety Population includes all sentinel and randomized participants in the FAS who received at least one dose of vosoritide or placebo in this study.
Serious adverse event (SAE)
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Z-Scores were derived using age-sex specific reference data (means and SDS) for average stature children per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A height Z score of 0 would indicate that the subject's height is equal to the mean height for the average stature population of the same sex and age. A positive height Z score indicates that the subjects height is above the mean height for the average stature population of the same sex and age, whilst a negative height Z score indicates that the subjects height is below the mean height for the average stature population of the same sex and age. To conclude if the height Z score increases then this means the height deficit has decreased.
standard deviation score (SDS).
The primary efficacy analysis population was the subset of randomized participants in the FAS.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
As a general rule, standing height/sitting height was used if participants were aged >= 24 months at baseline. Body length/crown to rump was used if participants were aged < 24 months at baseline. If body length was not measured and standing height was available, standing height was used.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
AGV was derived over 12-month intervals starting from the baseline visit. Annualized growth velocity (AGV) = Standing Height at Date 2 - Standing Height at Date 1/Interval Length (Days) x 365.25.
Difference in LS means were obtained from an analysis of covariance model.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Upper to Lower Body ratio=Sitting Height / (Standing Height - Sitting Height).
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Change from baseline in other growth measures (upper body length, head circumference, arm span, upper arm length, lower arm (Forearm) length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length (Thigh), knee to heel length, and tibial length) at Week 52.
Participants aged <24 months, body length and crown to rump length take precedence over standing height and sitting height. Participants aged <24 months at baseline and >=24 months at Week 52, body length and crown to rump length take precedence.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
For Height: subjects aged < 24 months, body length takes precedence over standing height. Subjects aged < 24 months at baseline and >= 24 months at Week 52, body length takes precedence.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Body Mass Index (BMI): For height used for BMI calculation, participants aged < 24 months, body length takes precedence over standing height. Participants aged < 24 months at baseline and >= 24 months at Week 52, body length takes precedence.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
The body mass index (BMI) Z-score represents the participant's BMI converted to an age and sex appropriate standard deviation score (SDS) by comparison with an average stature reference population. The weight Z-score of 0 represents the mean BMI for age and sex of the reference population. A positive BMI Z-score means BMI is above the mean BMI for the average stature population of the same sex and age and a negative BMI Z-Score means BMI is below the mean BMI for the average stature population of the same sex and age.
BMI Z-scores are derived only for participants aged 24 months or older, the change from baseline to Week 52 in BMI Z-score is summarized for Cohort 1 only as no participants in Cohort 2 or Cohort 3 were 24 months at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
The weight Z-score represents the participant's weight converted to an age and sex appropriate standard deviation score (SDS) by comparison with an average stature reference population. The weight Z-score of 0 represents the mean weight for age and sex of the reference population. A positive weight Z-score means weight is above the mean weight for the average stature population of the same sex and age and a negative weight Z-Score means weight is below the mean weight for the average stature population of the same sex and age.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
97(ITQOL) item full-length version was used. For each concept, item responses are scored, summed, & transformed on a scale from 0(worst health) to 100(best health).
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
97(ITQOL) item full-length version was used. For each concept, item responses are scored, summed, & transformed on a scale from 0(worst health) to 100(best health).
The number of subjects assessed in Cohort 3 Placebo is 0 as assessment was not done or overall score could not be derived because no more than half assessments were done at Screening/ baseline. Hence, Mean and Standard Deviation (SD) are not applicable.
Note: For each variable, there are different numbers of individual questions. The variable can only be derived if at least half of the questions were completed.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
97(ITQOL) item full-length version was used. For each concept, item responses are scored, summed, & transformed on a scale from 0(worst health) to 100(best health). A higher score indicates better global behaviour.
The number of subjects assessed in Cohort 3 Placebo is 0 as assessment was not done or overall score could not be derived because no more than half assessments were done at Screening/ baseline. Hence, Mean and Standard Deviation (SD) are not applicable.
Note: For each variable, there are different numbers of individual questions. The variable can only be derived if at least half of the questions were completed.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
97(ITQOL) item full-length version was used. For each concept, item responses are scored, summed, & transformed on a scale from 0(worst health) to 100(best health). A higher score indicates better global health perceptions.
The number of subjects assessed in Cohort 3 Placebo and Cohort 3 vosoritide are 0 as assessment was not done or overall score could not be derived because no more than half assessments were done at Screening/baseline. Hence, Mean and Standard Deviation (SD) are not applicable.
Note: For each variable, there are different numbers of individual questions. The variable can only be derived if at least half of the questions were completed.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
97(ITQOL) item full-length version was used. For each concept, item responses are scored, summed, & transformed on a scale from 0(worst health) to 100(best health). A higher score indicates better global change in health.
The number of subjects assessed in Cohort 3 Placebo is 0 as assessment was not done or overall score could not be derived because no more than half assessments were done at Screening/ baseline. Hence, Mean and Standard Deviation (SD) are not applicable.
Note: For each variable, there are different numbers of individual questions. The variable can only be derived if at least half of the questions were completed.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
The Pediatric Functional Independence Measure-II (WeeFIM®-II) is designed to measure functional independence of children between the ages of 6 months & 18 yrs who have physical or general developmental limitations. The WeeFIM-II is comprised of 3 domains that are rated by clinicians based on information obtained from parents/caregivers (self-care [score range 8 to 56], mobility [score range 8 to 35], & cognition [score range 8 to 35]) & provides a total score between 18 (worst) & 126 (Best). Higher score reflects higher level of independence.
Performance of a child on each of individual items within WeeFIM is assigned to one of seven levels on an ordinal scale that represent function from complete & modified independence (levels 7 & 6) without a helping person to modified & complete dependence (levels 5 to 1) with a helping person.
Functional Independence Measure (Wee-FIM-II) is only validated in children ages 6 months to 18 yrs. Therefore results for Cohort 3 is not summarized.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
BSID-III is performance-based clinician-reported outcome assessment for use in children from 1 to 42 months (1 month to 3.5 years). individually administered by the trained clinician to the participant/child
Scales include Cognitive subscale, Receptive and Expressive subscales, and Gross and Fine Motor subscales. The two language scales make up a composite Language Scale score and the Gross and Fine Motor subscales yield a composite Motor Scale score. In addition, there is a Social-Emotional Scale and Adaptive Behavior Scale, which is a questionnaire read and completed by parent or caregiver. Scores range from 0 to 2, and indicate mastery (2), emerging (1) or zero (not present)
Each (sub)scale yields a total raw score, standardized according to the participant's chronological age (scaled scores)
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
The CBCL is used as a screening tool for emotional or behavioral problems, measuring initial behavior severity, tracking changes in behavioral problems over the course of treatment, and treatment planning. The CBCL 1.5-5 years old consists of 100 questions, scored on a three-point Likert scale (0=Not True (as far as you know), 1= Somewhat or Sometimes True, 2=Very True or Often True). The scores for each individual question within a domain are summed to give a domain score. The CBCL uses a normative sample to create standard scores, which are scaled so that 50 is average with a standard deviation of 10, where higher scores indicate more emotional or behavioral issues.
CBCL was waived for children < 18 months old. Therefore results for Cohort 3 is not summarized.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52 End point timeframe:
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Baseline is defined as Day 1 or screening if a Day 1 assessment is not available.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Percentages were calculated using the total number of subjects in the safety population (N for each treatment group) as the denominator.
All increases are comparing results at Week 52 relative to the baseline assessment.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Hologic - Discovery Horizon Whole Body BMD Z-Score.
Change in whole body bone mineral density (BMD) Z-score from baseline at 52 weeks indicates whether there has been a positive or negative change in BMD using a z-score generated by converting the participants BMD to an age and sex appropriate standard deviation score (SDS) by comparison with an average stature reference population. A whole body BMD Z-score <-2 SD can indicate low bone density in children. The Whole Body BMD (bone mineral density) z-score compares the BMD to the average bone density of people of the same age, and sex as a comparator. A Z-score less than 0 means that the participant has a lower BMD than people in the same age and sex group, and could indicate a risk of osteopenia or osteoporosis.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Hologic - Discovery Horizon Lumbar Spine BMD Z-Score
Change in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) Z-score from baseline at 52 weeks indicates whether there has been a positive or negative change in BMD using a z-score generated by converting the participants lumbar spine BMD to an age and sex appropriate standard deviation score (SDS) by comparison with an average stature reference population. A BMD Z-score <-2 SD can indicate low bone density in the lumbar spine in children. The Lumbar Spine BMD (bone mineral density) z-score compares the BMD in the lumbar spine to the average spinal bone density of people of the same age, and sex as a comparator. A Z-score less than 0 means that the participant has a lower BMD than people in the same age and sex group, and could indicate a risk of osteopenia or osteoporosis of the spine.
Time frame: At Day 1, Week 3, Week 13, Week 26, Week 52, & Ever Positive.
Number of participants with Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled Visits for : total antibody (TAb), Neutralizing antibodies (NAb), atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) & C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP).
TAb Titer Positive, NAb Titer Positive, ANP Reactivity Positive, BNP Reactivity Positive & CNP Reactivity Positive.
Day 1 is the baseline assessment result taken prior to first dose of study drug.
Ever Positive = the number of participants with at least one positive sample result.
Time frame: At Baseline, Day 8, Week 6, Week 20, & Week 39.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52.
Time frame: Week 52 Pre-Dose to Week 52 Maximum Post-Dose.
Time frame: At Baseline, Day 8, Week 6, Week 20, & Week 39.
Laboratory results up to 30 days after study drug discontinuation were included.
Baseline is the last measurement prior to the initiation of study drug.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Sleep-testing device was used to assess presence & severity of sleep-disordered breathing by measurement of blood oxygen(O2)saturation,pulse rate,& airflow during overnight monitoring
Episodes(Epi) of sleep apnea variables summarized as: Number(No.)of epi of apnea/hr(AI);No.of epi of hypopnea/hr(HI);No.of epi of obstructive apnea hypopneas/hr(AHI);No.of epi of obstructive apneas/hr(Obstructive Apnea Index);No.of epi of central apneas/hr(CAI);No.of desaturations/hr >=3%
AHI is a marker of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), scored as No.of apnea or hypopnea epi/hr, with AHI <=1/hr normal, 1< AHI<=5 mild,5< AHI <=10 moderate,& AHI>10/hr severe OSA. CAI reflects cervical cord compression at cervical-medullary junction, & is No. of epi of a pause in ventilation with no associated respiratory effort, with> 5 epi/hr abnormal.O2 desaturation index measures average No. of desaturation epi/hr, defined as decrease in O2 saturation of >=3% for at least 10sec, with(<8/hr normal & >=8/hr abnormal
Time frame: At Day1, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52.
Vosoritide concentrations at 5-, 15- and 30-minute post-dose for one participant on Day 1 were not available, hence PK parameters for this participant were excluded from summary statistics.
PK parameters for another participant on Day 1 obtained from extrapolation. AUC0-∞ excluded from summary statistics. PK parameters are not available for this participant at Week 13 due to unsuccessful venipuncture, and Week 26 as post-dose PK samples were not collected.
Time frame: At Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52
Time frame: At Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52
Time frame: At Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52
Time frame: At Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52.
Time frame: At Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52.
Vosoritide concentrations at 5-, 15- and 30-minute post-dose for one participant on Day 1 were not available, hence PK parameters for this participant were excluded from summary statistics.
PK parameters for another participant on Day 1 obtained from extrapolation. AUC0-∞, CL/F, V/F and t1/2 excluded from summary statistics. PK parameters are not available for this participant at Week 13 due to unsuccessful venipuncture, and Week 26 as post-dose PK samples were not collected.
Time frame: At Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52.
Vosoritide concentrations at 5-, 15- and 30-minute post-dose for one participant on Day 1 were not available, hence PK parameters for this participant were excluded from summary statistics.
PK parameters for another participant on Day 1 obtained from extrapolation. V/F excluded from summary statistics. PK parameters are not available for this participant at Week 13 due to unsuccessful venipuncture, and Week 26 as post-dose PK samples were not collected.
Time frame: At Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52.
Vosoritide concentrations at 5-, 15- and 30-minute post-dose for one participant on Day 1 were not available, hence PK parameters for this participant were excluded from summary statistics.
PK parameters for another participant on Day 1 obtained from extrapolation. AUC0-∞, CL/F, V/F and t1/2 excluded from summary statistics. PK parameters are not available for this participant at Week 13 due to unsuccessful venipuncture, and Week 26 as post-dose PK samples were not collected.
BioMarin Pharmaceutical
Industry
A Phase 2 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of BMN 111 in Infants and Young Children With Achondroplasia, Age 0 to < 60 Months
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04265651
Achondroplasia, Bone Diseases
Oakland, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03197766
Achondroplasia, Bone Diseases
Oakland, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03424018
Achondroplasia, Bone Diseases
Oakland, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04035811
Achondroplasia, Bone Diseases
Oakland, California, United States
View Trial Details