X-Clip Treatment for Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation
DeviceAdult patients with moderate-to-severe or severe primary/degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR ≥3+) undergoing transcatheter mitral valve repair using the X-Clip Mitral Valve Clip System.
NCT Number: NCT07660185
Shenzhen Lifevalve Medical Scientific Co., Ltd. has developed a new X-Clip Mitral Valve Clip System and its compatible Steerable Guide System, aiming to provide transcatheter mitral valve repair for patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation. The two systems have completed all preclinical tests, including design verification tests, biological evaluation, and animal studies. All the test results confirmed that the systems met relevant design requirements. A First-in-Man clinical study was conducted in China in 2023, involving 11 patients. The study provides initial evidence that the X-Clip Mitral Valve Clip System and Steerable Guide System demonstrate favourable safety and efficacy in the treatment of mitral regurgitation in the Chinese population. The device is currently undergoing a pivotal clinical trial in China.
This study is a clinical study aimed to evaluate the safety and performance of the X-Clip Mitral Valve Clip System and Steerable Guide System in European population.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Mitral regurgitation (MR) is the most prevalent valvular heart disease globally. It is characterized by the backward flow of blood from the left ventricle (LV) into the left atrium (LA) through the mitral valve during systole, usually due to improper closure of the valve leaflets. This hemodynamic impairment can ultimately result in symptoms of heart failure, including fatigue, dyspnea, and progressive left ventricular dysfunction. MR affects 2-3% of the general population, with a prevalence increasing with age. Nearly 1 in 10 individuals aged ≥ 75 years reportedly has moderate or severe MR. This condition is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, making accurate diagnosis and management critical. In Europe, MR represents the second most prevalent valvular disorder requiring cardiac surgical intervention, highlighting its clinical significance in contemporary cardiology practice.
MR is classified based on its underlying etiology and mechanism. Primary mitral regurgitation (PMR), or degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR), results from intrinsic abnormalities of the mitral valve apparatus, such as degenerative changes in the valve leaflets, myxomatous infiltration, calcification of the annulus, or damage to the chordae tendineae. Secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR), or functional mitral regurgitation (FMR), typically occurs due to heart failure, left ventricular dilation, and altered coaptation of the mitral annulus. It arises when the mitral valve anatomy is normal, but abnormalities of the left ventricle or the left atrium disrupts the normal valvular function.
Surgical mitral valve intervention remains the gold standard for many patients, particularly those with severe and symptomatic DMR. However, nearly 50% of the patients with MR cannot undergo surgery due to comorbidities, advance age or high surgical risk. For these patients, transcatheter therapies offer a viable alternative, focusing on leaflet or annulus repair, or valve replacement. The most widely used technique is leaflet approximation (mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair, M-TEER) with more than 150,000 implantations worldwide. The TEER technique is minimally invasive with low risks. Compared to surgical repair, TEER results in fewer complications and shorter hospital stays.
Several TEER devices are available for MR treatment. Among them, the MitraClip device by Abbott Laboratories is the most widely adopted TEER device globally, while the PASCAL system by Edwards Lifesciences provides an alternative technology that may offer specific advantages in certain clinical scenarios. The X-ClipTM Mitral Valve Clip System and Steerable Guide System shares a similar concept with MitraClip and PASCAL systems but has unique features. It features a larger clamping area and employs a mechanical elastic clip design to ensure precise capture and grasping of leaflets. The system was initially studied in the First-in-Man feasibility study in China, which showed that TEER using the system is feasible and safe for the treating patients with moderate-to-severe and severe mitral regurgitation.
Here, this clinical study aims to further evaluate the safety and performance of the X-ClipTM Mitral Valve Clip System and Steerable Guide System in European population with moderate-to-severe and severe degenerative mitral regurgitation who are at high surgical risk and have suitable mitral anatomy for TEER.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
To participate in this study, the patient must meet ALL of the following inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria
Patients will be excluded if ANY of the following conditions apply:
Adult patients with moderate-to-severe or severe primary/degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR ≥3+) undergoing transcatheter mitral valve repair using the X-Clip Mitral Valve Clip System.
Time frame: At pre-discharge, 30 days ± 7 days post-procedure
MAEs are defined as cardiovascular mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, renal replacement therapy (e.g., dialysis), severe bleeding, and mitral valve reintervention (either transcatheter or surgical).
Note: MAEs are defined per Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium (MVARC).
Severe bleeding is major, extensive, life-threatening or fatal bleeding defined by the Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium.
Time frame: At 12 months ± 30 days post-procedure
Clinical success is defined as freedom from mortality, reintervention for mitral valve dysfunction, and moderate-to-severe or severe mitral regurgitation (grade≥3+) at the 12-month postoperative follow-up.
Note: *Mitral severity is evaluated through transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) or transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE).
Time frame: At 6 months ± 30 days post-procedure; 12 months ± 30 days post-procedure
Evaluation method: Evaluating and recording the number of subjects experiencing MAEs at 6 months ± 30 days and 12 months ± 30 days post-procedure.
Calculation formula: Incidence of MAEs = (Number of subjects with MAEs / Total number of subjects) × 100%
Time frame: From immediate post-procedure to the end of treatment at 5 years ± 60 days post-procedure
Evaluation method: All-cause mortality is defined as death from any cause, regardless of its relationship to the investigational device. However, when a death occurs, the cause of death (cardiovascular-related or non-cardiovascular-related) should be determined. Deaths for which no clear cause can be determined are classified as cardiovascular-related. The number of all-cause mortality subjects is recorded at immediate post-procedure, and 7 days ± 5 days, 30 days ± 7 days, 6 months ± 30 days, 12 months ± 30 days, 24 months ± 60 days, 36 months ± 60 days, 48 months ± 60 days, and 60 months ± 60 days post-procedure.
Calculation formula: All-cause mortality = (Number of all-cause mortality subjects / Total number of subjects) × 100%.
Time frame: From immediate post-procedure to the end of treatment at 5 years ± 60 days post-procedure
Evaluation method: The number of cardiac mortality subjects is recorded at immediate post-procedure, and 7 days ± 5 days, 30 days ± 7 days, 6 months ± 30 days, 12 months ± 30 days, 24 months ± 60 days, 36 months ± 60 days, 48 months ± 60 days, and 60 months ± 60 days post-procedure.
Calculation formula: Cardiac mortality = (Number of cardiac mortality subjects / Total number of subjects) × 100%.
Time frame: From immediate post-procedure to the end of treatment at 5 years ± 60 days post-procedure
Evaluation method: The types, incidences (%), and frequencies (number of occurrences) of AEs are recorded during the study period.
Time frame: From immediate post-procedure to the end of treatment at 5 years ± 60 days post-procedure
Evaluation method: The types, incidences (%), and frequencies (number of occurrences) of SAEs are recorded during the study period.
Time frame: At 30 days ± 7 days post-procedure, 6 months ± 30 days post-procedure
Evaluation method: Assessing and recording the number of subjects who experience no mortality, no reintervention for mitral valve dysfunction, and no moderate-to-severe or severe mitral regurgitation (≥3+) at 30 days ± 7 days and 6 months ± 30 days post-procedure.
Calculation formula: Clinical success rate = (Number of clinical success subjects / Total number of subjects) × 100%
Time frame: At 30 days ± 7 days post-procedure; 6 months ± 30 days post-procedure; 12 months ± 30 days post-procedure
Evaluation method: Evaluating and recording the number of subjects with NYHA function class I or II at 30 days ± 7 days, 6 months ± 30 days and 12 months ± 30 days post-procedure.
Calculation formula: Proportion of patients with NYHA Function Class I or II = (Number of subjects with NYHA function class I or II / Total number of subjects) × 100%
Time frame: At 30 days ± 7 days post-procedure; 6 months ± 30 days post-procedure; 12 months ± 30 days post-procedure
Evaluation method: Evaluating and recording the number of subjects experiencing HFH at 30 days ± 7 days, 6 months ± 30 days and 12 months ± 30 days post-procedure.
Calculation formula: Incidence of HFH = (Number of subjects experiencing HFH / Total number of subjects) × 100%
Time frame: At 30 days ± 7 days post-procedure; 6 months ± 30 days post-procedure; 12 months ± 30 days post-procedure
Evaluation method: Quality-of-life score is measured by Short-Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36) at 1-, 6-, and 12-months post-procedure and is compared with each patient's baseline scores.
Time frame: At 30 days ± 7 days post-procedure; 6 months ± 30 days post-procedure; 12 months ± 30 days post-procedure
Evaluation method: The change in M6WD is measured using the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) at 1-, 6-, and 12-months post-procedure and is compared with each patient's baseline distance.
Time frame: At immediate post-procedure; 7 days ± 5 days post-procedure; 30 days ± 7 days post-procedure; 6 months ± 30 days post-procedure; 12 months ± 30 days post-procedure
Evaluation method: Left ventricular function is assessed using parameters including left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD), and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD). Each parameter is measured at immediate post-procedure, and 7 days ± 5 days, 30 days ± 7 days, 6 months ± 30 days and 12 months ± 30 days post-procedure, and compared with each patient's baseline values.
Time frame: From immediate post-procedure to the end of treatment at 5 years ± 60 days post-procedure
Evaluation method: The mitral regurgitation degree of each subject is assessed according to Annex VIII: Evaluation of Mitral Regurgitation Severity, at immediate post-procedure, and 7 days ± 5 days, 30 days ± 7 days, 6 months ± 30 days, 12 months ± 30 days post-procedure, 24 months ± 60 days post-procedure, 36 months ± 60 days post-procedure, 48 months ± 60 days post-procedure, and 60 months ± 60 days post-procedure. The results are compared with each patients' baseline degree.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Shenzhen Lifevalve Medical Scientific Co., Ltd.
Industry
A Pre-Market, Prospective, Single-Arm, Open-Label Clinical Study of X-Clip Mitral Valve Clip System and Steerable Guide System for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair of Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07671820
Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases
View Trial DetailsNCT07655505
Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases
View Trial DetailsNCT07623083
Aortic Stenosis, Aortic Valve Disease
View Trial DetailsNCT07130994
Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Disease
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial Details