Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not yet recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07824973

Ketamine Treatment for Treatment-Resistant Depression - the Role of Framing

Ketamine is a medicine used in psychiatry for treatment-resistant depression. This study compares two ways of framing ketamine treatment: a psychedelic framing and a biomedical framing. The study will examine whether the framing affects depressive symptoms, treatment experience, tolerability, and longer-term outcomes.

Not yet recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Brain Stimulation Clinic, Skaraborg's Hospital

Skövde, Västra Götaland County, 54160, Sweden

Location contact

Alexandra Leinonen, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+46706371348

About this study

Ketamine is increasingly used in the treatment of treatment-resistant depression. In this study, ketamine is administered in the same clinical manner in both groups, but the treatment context differs. One group receives a psychedelic framing that presents subjective ketamine experiences as potentially meaningful and therapeutically relevant, while the other group receives a biomedical framing that presents ketamine as a pharmacological treatment and subjective effects as side effects. The study compares the effects of these two framings on depressive symptoms, treatment experience, tolerability, and selected longer-term outcomes measured through follow-up assessments and national registers.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Prescribed ketamine treatment for depression
  • Able to understand study information and provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who do not meet the inclusion criteria

Treatment and study plan

Psychedelic framing

Behavioral

The intervention includes:

  • Psychedelic framed patient information (video)
  • Psychedelic environment during infusions (mindfulness practice, music, eye mask) and psychological support provided towards engaging in the inner experience
  • Interview on the ketamine-induced experience

Other names: Contextual framing, Treatment setting

Biomedical framing

Behavioral

The intervention includes:

  • Biomedically framed patient information (video)
  • Psychological support provided during the infuion towards alleviating side effects such as dissociation
  • CADSS and BPRS

Other names: Contextual framing, Treatment setting

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in depressive symptoms (MADRS total score)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 12

    Mean change from baseline to week 12 in depressive symptoms measured with the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). The MADRS is a clinician-rated 10-item scale (0-6 per item; total score range 0-60), with higher scores indicating more severe depression.

Secondary outcomes

  1. MADRS response and remission

    Time frame: Week 12

    Proportion of participants achieving response and remission at week 12 based on MADRS total score. Response is defined as ≥50% reduction from baseline. Remission is defined as MADRS <11.

  2. Self-reported depressive symptoms (MADRS-S)

    Time frame: Baseline, weeks 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 12, and month 6

    Change over time in self-reported depressive symptoms measured with the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale - Self-rated (MADRS-S). The MADRS-S is a 9-item scale (0-6 per item; total score range 0-54), with higher scores indicating more severe depression.

  3. Suicidal ideation (MADRS-S item 9)

    Time frame: Baseline, weeks 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 12, and month 6

    Change over time in self-reported suicidal ideation measured by item 9 of the MADRS-S (score 0-6; higher scores indicate greater severity).

  4. Time to hospitalization

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

    Time from baseline to first hospitalization due to depression during follow-up

  5. Adverse events and treatment discontinuation

    Time frame: Baseline to week 12

    Incidence of adverse events (mild, moderate, severe) and time to treatment discontinuation for any reason.

  6. Ketamine-related adverse effects (Modified KSET)

    Time frame: Week 1 and week 4

    Ketamine-related adverse effects measured with a modified version of the Ketamine Side Effect Tool (KSET), a 20-item patient-rated scale (0-3 per item; higher scores indicate greater side effect burden).

  7. Quality of life and health (VAS)

    Time frame: Baseline, weeks 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 12, and months 6 and 12

    Change in self-rated quality of life and health measured with a visual analogue scale from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better perceived quality of life and health.

  8. Satisfaction with life

    Time frame: Baseline to week 12

    Life satisfaction measured with the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS). The SWLS has 5 items rated on a 7-point scale, with total scores ranging from 5 to 35. Higher scores indicate greater life satisfaction.

  9. Subjective sleep quality

    Time frame: Baseline to week 12

    Subjective sleep quality measured with the Brief Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (B-PSQI). The questionnaire asks about sleep habits during the previous month and includes bedtime, sleep latency, wake time, sleep duration, nighttime sleep problems, overall sleep quality, and use of sleep medication. Higher scores indicate worse sleep quality.

  10. Perceived social support

    Time frame: Baseline to week 12

    Perceived social support measured with the Social Provisions Scale-5 (SPS-5). The scale has 5 items rated on a 4-point scale from 1 to 4, with total scores ranging from 5 to 20. Higher scores indicate greater perceived social support.

  11. Loneliness

    Time frame: Baseline to week 12

    Loneliness measured with the UCLA Loneliness Scale, 3-item version. The scale has 3 items rated from 1 to 3, with total scores ranging from 3 to 9. Higher scores indicate greater loneliness.

  12. Screen time

    Time frame: Baseline to week 12

    Screen time measured with the Screen Time questionnaire (ScrT), which assesses average daily time spent on social media, gaming, TV/streaming, and background TV/streaming use. Higher response categories indicate more screen exposure.

  13. Absorption

    Time frame: Baseline to week 12

    Trait absorption measured with the Modified Tellegen Absorption Questionnaire (MODTAS). The questionnaire assesses tendency to become fully absorbed in sensory, imaginative, or experiential activities; higher scores indicate greater absorption.

  14. Trait anxiety

    Time frame: Baseline to week 12

    Trait anxiety measured with the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory short form (STAI-SF). Higher scores indicate greater anxiety-proneness.

  15. Cognitive fusion

    Time frame: Baseline to week 12

    Cognitive fusion measured with the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (CFQ-7). The questionnaire has 7 items rated on a 7-point scale; total scores range from 7 to 49. Higher scores indicate greater cognitive fusion, meaning more entanglement with thoughts and less psychological flexibility.

  16. Goal attainment for behavioral activation

    Time frame: Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 12

    Goal attainment measured with the Goal Attainment Scale for Depression (GAS-D). Individual goals are rated on a 5-point scale from -2 to +2, where 0 reflects expected goal attainment and higher scores indicate better-than-expected attainment.

  17. Therapeutic alliance

    Time frame: baseline, week 2, 6 and 12

    Therapeutic alliance measured with the Working Alliance Inventory - Short Revised (WAI-SR) completed by participants and the Working Alliance Inventory - Short form (WAI-SRT) completed by clinicians. The instruments assess the quality of the working relationship across goal agreement, task agreement, and bond. Higher scores indicate a stronger therapeutic alliance.

  18. Acute mystical and challenging experiences

    Time frame: Immediately after each of 6 infusions during weeks 1 to 4

    Acute ketamine-related subjective experiences measured after each infusion with the Mystical Experience Questionnaire short form (MEQ-4) and the Challenging Experience Questionnaire short form (CEQ-7). The MEQ-4 is a 4-item self-report measure of mystical-type experience, scored 0 to 5 per item, with higher scores indicating a stronger mystical experience. The CEQ-7 is a 7-item self-report measure of challenging experience, scored 0 to 5 per item, with higher scores indicating a more difficult or distressing experience.

  19. Mystical experience

    Time frame: Week 5

    Mystical experience measured with the Mystical Experience Questionnaire (MEQ-30). The MEQ-30 is a 30-item self-report questionnaire scored on a 0 to 5 scale and assesses mystical-type experience across domains such as unity, sacredness, positive mood, transcendence of time and space, and ineffability. Higher scores indicate a stronger mystical experience.

  20. Expectancy

    Time frame: Baseline, week 1 and 2

    Treatment expectation measured with patient- and clinician-rated treatment expectation questionnaires. The patient questionnaire and clinician questionnaire assess expected benefit from treatment and perceived treatment credibility. Higher scores indicate greater treatment expectancy.

  21. Drug liking and perceived drug effects

    Time frame: Immediately after infusion 2 and infusion 6 during weeks 1 and 4

    Acute drug effects measured with the Drug Effect Questionnaire (DEQ). The DEQ uses 0 to 100 visual analogue ratings to assess perceived drug effect, feeling high, liking and disliking effects, and desire for more drug. Higher scores indicate stronger perceived drug effects and greater drug liking or desire for more drug, depending on the item.

  22. Altered states of consciousness

    Time frame: Week 5

    Altered states of consciousness measured with the 5-Dimensional Altered States of Consciousness Scale (5D-ASC). The 5D-ASC assesses five dimensions of altered consciousness; higher scores indicate a more intense altered state in the relevant dimension.

  23. Psychological insight

    Time frame: Week 5

    Psychological insight measured with the Psychological Insight Scale (PIS). The PIS contains 7 items rated from 0 to 100 and assesses new insight into one's past, self, lifestyle, and behavior change. Higher scores indicate greater psychological insight.

  24. Treatment evaluation

    Time frame: Week 6

    Treatment evaluation measured with patient- and clinician-rated treatment evaluation questionnaires. These questionnaires assess overall appraisal of the treatment experience and perceived usefulness of the intervention. Higher scores indicate a more positive treatment evaluation.

  25. Personality traits

    Time frame: Baseline

    Personality measured with the Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI). The TIPI is a 10-item self-report measure of the Big Five personality traits: extraversion, emotional stability, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and openness to experience. It is administered as a baseline covariate; higher trait scores indicate more of the relevant personality dimension.

  26. Substance-related convictions or diagnoses

    Time frame: 12 months

    Occurrence of a drug-related conviction or substance use disorder diagnosis during follow-up.

  27. Work ability and social transfers

    Time frame: 12 months

    Employment-related income and social transfer dependence during follow-up, assessed as income net of social transfers.

  28. Psychotropic medication use

    Time frame: 12 months

    Average daily defined dose of prescribed psychotropic medication during follow-up.

Other outcomes

  1. Subjective ketamine experience interview

    Time frame: After infusion 1, infusion 3, and infusion 6 during weeks 1, 2, and 4

    Subjective ketamine experience assessed with a semi-structured post-infusion interview in the psychedelic treatment group only. The interview explores sensory experiences, emotions, thought control, self-body experience, space, time, mystical or spiritual experiences, changes in meaning, and post-session insight. Interview reports will be transcribed and content-analyzed to derive quantitative and thematic results.

  2. Acute dissociative symptoms

    Time frame: After each of 6 infusions during weeks 1 to 4

    Dissociative symptoms measured with the Clinician Administered Dissociative States Scale (CADSS) in the biomedical treatment group only. The CADSS is a clinician-administered scale with 23 items rated 0 to 4, assessing experiences such as depersonalization, derealization, altered body perception, altered sense of time, and memory gaps. Higher scores indicate greater dissociation.

  3. Acute psychiatric symptoms

    Time frame: After each of 6 infusions during weeks 1 to 4

    Acute psychiatric symptoms measured with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) in the biomedical treatment group only. The BPRS is a clinician-rated interview scale assessing symptoms such as anxiety, depression, hostility, unusual thought content, hallucinations, and disorganization. Higher scores indicate greater psychiatric symptom severity.

  4. Incremental costs associated with psychedelic versus biomedical framing

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

    Incremental intervention-related and healthcare costs associated with psychedelic framing compared with biomedical framing.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Alexandra Leinonen, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+46706371348

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Valdemar Landgren

Other Gov

Registry information

Official study title

A Single-center Open-label Randomized Parallel-group Superiority Trial to Compare the Efficacy of Psychedelic and Biomedical Framing of Intravenous Ketamine for Treatment-resistant Depression - the KetSet Trial

Acronym: KetSet

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2029
Study completion
2030
First posted
Sep 17, 2026
Registry last updated
Sep 17, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.