Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07760168

Study of rTMS in Maintenance in Treatment Resistant Depression

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn which treatment works better to help people with treatment-resistant depression stay well after they improve with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a non-invasive brain stimulation treatment. It will also learn about the safety of maintenance rTMS and maintenance quetiapine.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does maintenance rTMS help prevent depression from returning better than maintenance quetiapine? Do participants receiving maintenance rTMS have greater improvement in depression symptoms over time than those receiving maintenance quetiapine? What side effects or medical problems occur with each treatment?

Researchers will compare maintenance rTMS with maintenance quetiapine after all participants have completed the initial course of rTMS.

Participants will:

Receive an initial course of rTMS. Be randomly assigned to receive either maintenance rTMS or maintenance quetiapine.

Attend regular follow ups to assess depression symptoms with MADRS , assess overall improvement by CGI , and any side effects.

Provide blood samples at selected visits to measure brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a protein that may be be linked to recovery from depression.

Be followed for several months to monitor whether their depression returns and how well they continue to improve.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

About this study

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is a major cause of disability and is associated with persistent symptoms, reduced quality of life, increased healthcare utilization, and a high risk of relapse despite evidence-based treatment. Although repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an established treatment for TRD, many patients experience recurrence of depressive symptoms after completion of the acute treatment course. At present, there is no universally accepted maintenance strategy following successful acute rTMS.

Maintenance rTMS has shown promise in reducing relapse; however, existing randomized studies have primarily compared maintenance rTMS with sham stimulation, antidepressants, or lithium. No randomized controlled trial has directly compared maintenance accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (aiTBS) with quetiapine augmentation, despite quetiapine having Level 1 evidence as an augmentation strategy for TRD in the Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) guidelines. This represents an important gap in evidence for long-term management following acute neuromodulation.

The present study is a hospital-based, investigator-initiated, randomized, open-label, rater-blinded, parallel-group clinical trial conducted at the Department of Psychiatry, AIIMS Bhubaneswar. All participants will receive an acute course of accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation while continuing treatment as usual (TAU). Following completion of the acute phase, participants will be randomly allocated to receive either maintenance aiTBS or quetiapine augmentation in addition to TAU. This design allows direct comparison of two evidence-based maintenance approaches after a common acute neuromodulation intervention.

The study will evaluate whether maintenance aiTBS provides sustained clinical benefit comparable or superior to quetiapine augmentation while maintaining an acceptable safety profile. In addition to clinical assessments, the study will examine changes in serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a biomarker associated with neuroplasticity, to explore its relationship with treatment response during the maintenance phase.

The findings from this trial are expected to provide evidence regarding the comparative effectiveness and safety of maintenance neuromodulation versus pharmacological augmentation after acute rTMS in treatment-resistant depression. The results may help inform future maintenance treatment strategies and improve long-term outcomes for individuals with TRD.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients of both genders, between the ages 18- 60 years
  • Clinically diagnosed as depression according to ICD-11.
  • Diagnosis of treatment resistance depression according to US-FDA.
  • On stable dosing of antidepressant venlafaxine 150 mg per day.
  • Right-handed.

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnant or lactating women.
  • Any kind of psychiatric emergency (E.g., Suicide risk, Catatonia, aggression or excitement)
  • Any co-morbid neurological disease
  • History of seizure/ epilepsy.
  • History of migraine.
  • History of head trauma/ organic brain condition.
  • Any contraindications to rTMS procedure:
  • Metallic or electronic implants in the brain or heart, or any cochlear implants
  • Injury or local lesion in the scalp/head.

Treatment and study plan

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Device

Treatment Schedule: After completion of acute treatment with rTMS, Patients will receive 5 days of treatment (as per previously mentioned schedule) per week for one week only in a month for maintenance sessions, for a total patient treatment duration of 3 months.

Quetiapine

Drug

After completion of acute course of rTMS, Patients will receive Quetiapine as a pharmacological augmentation to their standard TAU, dosed and titrated as per standard clinical guidelines for Treatment-Resistant Depression.

Primary outcomes

  1. To compare the efficacy of maintenance accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation vs Quetiapine on symptomatology in terms of change in MADRS score in patients with treatment resistance depression

    Time frame: Change From Baseline in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. To compare the efficacy of maintenance accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation vs Quetiapine on biomarker in terms of change in BDNF levels in patients with treatment resistance depression.

    Time frame: Change From Baseline in Serum Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) Levels at 12 Weeks.

  2. To compare the efficacy of maintenance accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation vs Quetiapine on severity of illness in terms of change in CGI score in patients with treatment resistance depression.

    Time frame: Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) and Clinical Global Impression- Severity (CGI-S) Score at 12 Weeks

  3. To compare treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) between the study groups.

    Time frame: Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) during the 12-Week Study Period

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Efficacy and Safety of Acute Followed by Maintenance rTMS in Treatment Resistant Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2028
First posted
Aug 12, 2026
Registry last updated
Aug 12, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.