Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Enrolling by invitation

NCT Number: NCT07791069

International Multicenter Outcomes of Transcatheter Pulmonary Flow Restrictors in Congenital and Acquired Heart Disease

The international multicenter registry aims to collect real-world data on clinical outcomes and evaluate the net clinical success of transcatheter microvascular plug (MVP)-based pulmonary flow restrictors (PFRs) in patients with congenital and acquired heart disease.

Enrolling by invitation

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

Up to 3 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Marie Lannelongue Hospital, Le Plessis-Robinson, France

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This is a multicenter, international, non-randomized, non-interventional, observational post-marketing clinical follow-up study with retrospective and prospective data collection, designed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of off-label implantation of microvascular plug (MVP)-based pulmonary flow restrictors (PFRs) in patients with congenital and acquired heart disease.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Pediatric patients (≤3 years) with any congenital or acquired heart disease, regardless of gender, ethnicity, or geographic location, who underwent transcatheter insertion of the MVP-based PFR device in single or bilateral PA branches between January 2019 and January 2028.
  • Informed consent obtained from parents or legal guardians.

Exclusion criteria

  • Study device implanted in other locations: modified BT shunt, arterial duct, stented arterial duct, Sano conduit, and central shunt.

Treatment and study plan

Transcatheter pulmonary flow restriction

Device

Transcatheter implantation of a microvascular plug (MVP)-based pulmonary flow restrictor (PFR) in a single or bilateral pulmonary artery (PA) branch(es).

Other names: Percutaneous pulmonary flow restriction, Endovascular pulmonary flow restriction

Primary outcomes

  1. Net clinical success

    Time frame: From date of device implant until the date of surgical device removal, assessed up to 24 months

    Composite non-hierarchical net clinical success, evaluated at the time of surgical PFR removal (either as a standalone procedure or during target surgery), and defined by meeting the following three criteria: 1) technical success (successful implantation and retention* of the MVP device in each branch PA), 2) clinical success (evidence of PBF restriction** at PFR removal), and 3) safety success (no major adverse device-related events (MADREs).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Technical implantation success

    Time frame: From date of device implant until hospital discharge, assessed up to 6 weeks

    Technical success of PFR implantation (device successfully delivered, deployed, and retained in each branch PA) at hospital discharge after the index procedure.

  2. Immediate flow restriction success

    Time frame: From device implant to procedure conclusion

    Immediate flow restriction success of MVP-based PFRs, defined as technical success and evidence of pulmonary blood flow (BPF) restriction, at procedure conclusion (Evidence of

    PBF restriction at procedure conclusion was defined as a minimal drop in oxygen saturation on arterial blood gas by 10% at the same level of FiO2 compared to preoperative levels, a systolic-diastolic Doppler-pattern across the PFRs with a minimum peak Doppler gradient of 40 mmHg (Vmax=3.2 m/s) on per-procedural ultrasound assessment, and, when performed, a reduction in the baseline QP/QS mismatch by 50%).

  3. Safety success

    Time frame: From date of device implant until the date of surgical device removal, assessed up to 24 months

    Safety success (freedom from MADREs*, vascular-, or procedure-related SAEs**) at the time of device removal. The severity of MADRE and SAE will be classified using a validated 1-to-5 scale, ranging from none to catastrophic.

    *MADREs include device-related vascular erosion, vascular aneurysm/pseudoaneurysm, bronchial compression, device collapse, migration, embolization, thrombosis, fracture, infection, endocarditis, resulting in unplanned or anticipated device removal, or redo-intervention (surgical or catheter-based)

    **SAEs encompassed device- vascular- or procedure-related adverse events resulting in death, life-threatening situations, hospitalization, disability, or major surgical intervention.

  4. All cause mortality

    Time frame: From date of device implant until the date of surgical device removal, assessed up to 24 months

    All-cause mortality rate at the time of device removal.

Other outcomes

  1. Freedom from unplanned pulmonary artery (PA) reintervention

    Time frame: From date of device implant until the date of surgical device removal, assessed up to 24 months

    Freedom from unplanned PA reintervention (surgical or catheter-based) until surgical device removal

  2. Freedom from unplanned pulmonary artery intervention post-device removal

    Time frame: From date of surgical device removal through 24 months after removal

    Freedom from unplanned PA intervention at 24 months following surgical device removal (such as angioplasty or stenting for residual stenosis or deformity at the former device site).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph

Other

Registry information

Official study title

RESTRICT : International Multicenter Outcomes of Transcatheter Pulmonary Flow Restrictors in Congenital and Acquired Heart Disease

Acronym: RESTRICT

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2029
Study completion
2030
First posted
Aug 27, 2026
Registry last updated
Aug 27, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.