Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07779707

The Medically Tailored Groceries and Mental Health Study

This randomized controlled trial will test whether providing medically tailored groceries for 6 months can improve depressive symptoms among adults with depression and food insecurity.

The intervention under study is a 6-month, medically tailored grocery program provided by the Boston-based non-profit organization, Community Servings. Food boxes are mailed to participants' homes every two weeks and are designed by a registered dietitian nutritionists to support an individuals' health needs. Participants may also attend optional nutritional counseling sessions.

In this randomized clinical trial, 300 adults with depression and food insecurity will be assigned to one of two groups. The intervention group will receive medically tailored grocery boxes delivered to their home every two weeks for six months (13 boxes total), along with nutritional counseling support. The comparison group will receive usual medical care plus a $30 monthly grocery gift card for six months to be used to purchase any products of their choice.

Participants will be recruited from UMass Memorial Health and health centers associated with Community Care Cooperative (C3) in the greater Worcester area in Massachusetts.The main goal of the study is to determine whether the grocery program reduces symptoms of depression. The study will also examine effects on anxiety, food insecurity, diet quality, and healthcare use.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Community Care Cooperative (C3), Worcester, Massachusetts, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Food insecurity, defined as limited or uncertain access to adequate food for an active and healthy life, is strongly associated with poor mental health outcomes, including depression. Individuals experiencing food insecurity often face chronic stress, reduced dietary quality, and barriers to managing health conditions, all of which can worsen depressive symptoms. Despite this well-established relationship, there is limited rigorous evidence evaluating food-based interventions as a primary strategy to improve mental health.

Medically tailored grocery (MTG) programs are an emerging "Food is Medicine" intervention that provides groceries tailored to an individual's health needs, along with nutrition education and support. Unlike medically tailored meals, MTG programs support individuals in preparing their own meals, which may improve dietary quality, increase self-efficacy, and reduce food insecurity. While prior studies suggest that food-based interventions may improve mental health outcomes, no randomized controlled trials have evaluated MTG with depression as the primary outcome.

This study is a single-site, open-label, randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the efficacy of an MTG intervention among adults with depression and food insecurity. A total of 300 participants will be recruited by Community Servings and UMass Chan Medical School and randomized 1:1 to either the MTG intervention or a control group receiving usual care plus a food subsidy. Participants in the intervention group will receive 13 medically tailored grocery boxes over six months, along with nutrition support. The control group will receive usual care and a $30 monthly food subsidy for six months.

The primary outcome is the change in depressive symptoms measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Secondary outcomes include anxiety symptoms, food insecurity, dietary quality, and healthcare utilization, including emergency department visits and hospitalizations. This trial is designed to generate rigorous evidence on the role of medically tailored grocery programs in improving mental health and to inform future clinical and policy decisions regarding the integration of nutrition interventions into healthcare.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • A depression diagnosis with active symptoms, defined as having a recent Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) screening of 5+, or no depression diagnosis but a recent PHQ-9 screening of 10+
  • Experiencing food insecurity (could be either low or very low food security)
  • Lives in Central Massachusetts in Worcester County
  • Receives care at UMass Memorial Health, or receives care at clinics affiliated with Community Care Cooperative (C3)
  • Can prepare and cook meals independently, or has a family member or caregiver able to prepare food

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnant women and women who are within one year postpartum at baseline. Women who become pregnant during trial will be allowed to finish their food programming and study participation.
  • New depression diagnosis within the past 3 months
  • Has bipolar depression or bipolar disorder

Treatment and study plan

Medically Tailored, Home-delivered Groceries

Other

13-box home grocery delivery (1 Welcome Box of pantry and spice staples and 12 grocery boxes) for a six-month intervention period; nutrition and other resources to sustain the benefit of the intervention.

Other names: MTG

Active Comparison Group: Monthly Grocery Gift Card

Other

$30/month food subsidy in the form of gift cards to Amazon or Hannaford grocery stores

Other names: Food Subsidy

Primary outcomes

  1. Depressive Symptoms as measured by Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) [Time Frame: 6 months]

    Time frame: At baseline and within the last month of the program enrollment (6 months)

    The PHQ-9 is a standardized clinical tool to diagnose and monitor depression. The survey consists of 9 questions, each with four possible responses, and is scored from 0 to 27. Standardized scoring is as follows: 1- 4 minimal depression, 5 - 9 mild depression, 10 - 14 moderate depression, 15-19 moderately severe depression, 20 - 27 severe depression. Each study participant (both treatment and control groups) will have a baseline PHQ-9 assessment at the time of randomization and a second assessment at program end (within the last month of program enrollment).

    As part of the PHQ-9, if a participant reports any symptoms, then a follow-up question is promoted: "If you reported any problems, how difficult have these problems made it for you to do your work, take care of things at home, or get along with other people?" with responses ranging from "not difficult at all" to "extremely difficult".

Secondary outcomes

  1. Anxiety symptoms as measured by the General Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) questionnaire [Time Frame: 6 months]

    Time frame: At baseline and within the last month of the program enrollment (6 months)

    Investigators will use the standardized General Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) questionnaire, which is also routinely used in clinical care. The survey is 7-question tool used to screen for generalized anxiety disorder and assess severity of anxiety symptoms over the last two weeks. Scores range from 0 to 21, with higher numbers describing more severe anxiety.

    As part of the GAD-7, if a participant reports any symptoms, then a follow-up question is promoted: "If you reported any problems, how difficult have these problems made it for you to do your work, take care of things at home, or get along with other people?" with responses ranging from "not difficult at all" to "extremely difficult".

  2. Self-Reported MENTAL Health Status [Time Frame: 6 months]

    Time frame: At baseline and within the last month of the program enrollment (6 months)

    The self-reported MENTAL health question is adapted from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) and National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) surveys. This will assessed using: " Would you say that in general your MENTAL health is excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor?"

    The five response options range from "poor" to "excellent."

  3. Self-Reported PHYSICAL Health Status [Time Frame: 6 months]

    Time frame: At baseline and within the last month of the program enrollment (6 months)

    This self-reported PHYSICAL health question is adapted from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) and National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) surveys. This will be assessed using: " Would you say that in general your PHYSICAL health is excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor?"

    The five response options range from "poor" to "excellent."

  4. Food Insecurity, as measured by the Hunger Vital Sign [Time Frame: 6 months]

    Time frame: At baseline and within the last month of the program enrollment (6 months)

    Investogators will use the 2-item Hunger Vital Sign, which is a validated screener used by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and most health systems that screen for food insecurity.

  5. Nutrition Insecurity as measured by the Tufts-Kaiser Permanente 1-item screener [Time Frame: 6 months]

    Time frame: At baseline and within the last month of the program enrollment (6 months)

    The validated, 1-item nutrition security screener assesses nutrition security using the following question: "Thinking about the last month, how hard was it for you or your household to regularly get and eat healthy foods? Include food from all sources when thinking about your response?" The five possible responses range from "Very hard" to "Not hard at all."

  6. Unplanned, Inpatient Hospitalizations [Time Frame: 6 months]

    Time frame: Total counts from baseline to program end (6 months)

    Total counts per 6 months (i.e., 6-month rate) and reasons for each admission. Analyses will also report rates for mental health-related admissions and all-cause admissions. As a secondary assessment of inpatient hospitalizations, investigators will also report the proportion of study participants with at least one admission.

  7. Emergency Department Visits [Time Frame: 6 months]

    Time frame: Total counts from baseline to program end (6 months)

    Total counts per 6 months (i.e., 6-month rate) and reasons for each admission. Analyses will also report rates for mental health-related admissions and all-cause admissions. As a secondary assessment of Emergency Department (ED) utilization, investigators will also report the proportion of study participants with at least one ED visit.

  8. Fruit and Vegetable Consumption as measured by the Dietary Screener Questionnaire-10 [Time Frame: 6 months]

    Time frame: At baseline and within the last month of the program enrollment (6 months)

    Investigators will use the Dietary Screener Questionnaire (DSQ-10), a 10-item fruit and vegetable screener that is routinely used in similar research and promoted by the United States Department of Agriculture and the American Heart Association. The survey tool will report servings per day of fruits and vegetables. Response options range from "never" to "6 or more times per day" to measure average daily dietary intake.

  9. Dairy Consumption, servings per day as measured by the Dietary Screener Questionnaire [Time Frame: 6 months]

    Time frame: At baseline and within the last month of the program enrollment (6 months)

    Investigators will use the Dietary Screener Questionnaire, a survey tool promoted by the United States Department of Agriculture and the American Heart Association. The survey tool will report servings per day of dairy, including milk and cheese. Response options range from "never" to "6 or more times per day" to measure average daily dietary intake.

  10. Whole Grain Consumption, servings per day, as measured by the Dietary Screener Questionnaire [Time Frame: 6 months]

    Time frame: At baseline and within the last month of the program enrollment (6 months)

    Investigators will use the Dietary Screener Questionnaire, a survey tool promoted by the United States Department of Agriculture and the American Heart Association. The survey tool will report servings per day of whole grains from all sources. Response options range from "never" to "6 or more times per day" to measure average daily dietary intake.

Other outcomes

  1. Program Adherence: Deliveries, as measured by number of food box deliveries per participant [Time Frame: 6 months]

    Time frame: 6 months

    This measure will report the number of food box deliveries for each participant during program participation.

  2. Program Adherence, Self-Reported Consumption of Food [Time Frame: 6 months]

    Time frame: Assessed at program end at 6 months

    Self-reported consumption of food, as assessed by the following questions:

    • "How much of the food from the Community Servings' Grocery Boxes did you usually eat?" Responses range from "None of the food" to "All of the food."
    • If you didn't eat all of the food, what are the reasons why you didn't eat all of the food? Responses include, "I shared food with my family or friends; I didn't like some of the meals and ingredients; It was too much food for me; I had challenges cooking the food; If another reason, explain why [open ended response]".

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Kurt Hager, PhD, MS

CONTACT

[email protected]

508-856-3247

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Massachusetts, Worcester

Other

Collaborators

  • Community Servings
  • Health Foundation of Central Massachusetts

Registry information

Acronym: MTG : RCT

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2029
Study completion
2029
First posted
Aug 21, 2026
Registry last updated
Aug 26, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.