Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not yet recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07771387

Early Predictors of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Extremely Preterm Infants

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) remains one of the most common complications in extremely preterm infants despite advances in neonatal intensive care. Early identification of infants at high risk for BPD could facilitate individualized treatment strategies and improve long-term respiratory outcomes. However, current prediction models rely primarily on conventional clinical variables and have limited predictive accuracy.

This prospective observational study aims to evaluate the predictive value of novel physiological, imaging, and biomarker-based indicators for the development of BPD in infants born before 26 weeks of gestation. Participants admitted to the neonatal intensive care units of the Medical University of Vienna will undergo non-invasive assessments during routine clinical care. These include respiratory function monitoring during neonatal transition, lung ultrasound, diaphragmatic ultrasound, targeted neonatal echocardiography, forced oscillation technique, neurally adjusted ventilatory assist-derived diaphragmatic electrical activity, electrical impedance tomography, and proteomic analyses of plasma and tracheal aspirate samples.

The association between these novel indicators and respiratory disease severity will be assessed using the Respiratory Severity Score (RSS). Their ability to predict BPD will be evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and uni- and multivariable logistic regression models. Predictive performance will be assessed using the C-statistics.

The primary objectives are to determine the correlation between the novel indicators and the RSS and to evaluate their diagnostic accuracy for predicting BPD. Secondary objectives include identifying the combination of indicators that provides the best prediction of BPD, evaluating longitudinal changes in respiratory and cardiovascular parameters during the neonatal period, assessing the effects of respiratory interventions and treatments on these indicators, and investigating associations with survival and major neonatal morbidities.

A total of 140 extremely preterm infants is planned for inclusion in the study. The results are expected to improve early risk stratification and contribute to the development of individualized strategies for preventing and managing BPD.

Not yet recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

About this study

Background:

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) remains one of the most frequent and clinically relevant complications of extreme prematurity. Although advances in perinatal and neonatal care have substantially improved the survival of infants born at the limits of viability, the incidence of BPD has remained relatively unchanged. BPD is associated with prolonged respiratory support, recurrent respiratory infections, pulmonary hypertension, impaired lung function throughout childhood and adulthood, adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes, and increased healthcare utilization.

Current prediction of BPD is primarily based on conventional clinical variables, including gestational age, birth weight, duration of respiratory support, oxygen requirement, and the Respiratory Severity Score (RSS), calculated as the product of mean airway pressure (MAP) and the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂). Although these parameters provide valuable information regarding disease severity, they do not directly characterize the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of lung injury or capture the complex interactions between pulmonary mechanics, ventilation distribution, respiratory muscle function, cardiovascular adaptation, and inflammatory responses.

Several novel monitoring technologies have become available in neonatal intensive care over the past decade. These include lung ultrasound, targeted neonatal echocardiography, respiratory function monitoring, electrical impedance tomography, neurally adjusted ventilatory assist, forced oscillation technique, and advanced proteomic analyses. These technologies provide quantitative physiological information that may identify infants at increased risk of developing BPD before irreversible lung injury occurs. However, their predictive value when evaluated in combination has not yet been systematically assessed in a comprehensive prospective cohort.

This study aims to investigate whether physiological, imaging, and molecular biomarkers obtained during the neonatal period improve the early prediction of BPD compared with conventional clinical indicators.

Study Objectives:

The primary objective is to determine the predictive value of novel physiological, imaging, and biomarker-based indicators for the development of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in extremely preterm infants.

Specific objectives include:

  • evaluating the association between novel measurements and the respiratory severity score (RSS);
  • determining the diagnostic performance of each parameter for predicting BPD;
  • identifying combinations of predictors that provide optimal discrimination between infants who develop BPD and those who do not;
  • evaluating longitudinal changes of physiological parameters during the first weeks of life;
  • investigating the effects of respiratory interventions and routine clinical management on these measurements.

Study Design:

This is a prospective, single-center, observational clinical study performed at the neonatal intensive care units of the Medical University of Vienna.

No experimental intervention will be performed. All patients will receive standard neonatal intensive care according to local protocols. Study-related assessments consist of non-invasive physiological measurements that are performed alongside routine clinical care whenever possible.

Study Population:

Eligible participants are infants born before 26 completed weeks of gestation who are admitted to the neonatal intensive care units of the Medical University of Vienna.

Written informed consent will be obtained from parents or legal guardians before study inclusion according to institutional regulations.

The a-priori sample size calculation was based on previously published data on the predictive performance of lung ultrasound (LUS) and the Forced Oscillation Technique (FOT). Assuming a BPD incidence of approximately 30%, a statistical power of 95%, a two-sided significance level of 5%, and an anticipated dropout rate of 30%, the required sample size was estimated to be 140 infants.

Study Procedures:

Each participant will undergo repeated physiological and imaging assessments during the neonatal period.

  • Respiratory Function Monitoring During neonatal stabilization immediately after birth, respiratory function monitoring will be used to continuously record ventilatory parameters during mask ventilation, CPAP, or mechanical ventilation.

Measured variables include:

  • peak inspiratory pressure,
  • expiratory tidal volume,
  • respiratory rate,
  • leak around the face mask,
  • airway pressure curves,
  • ventilation effectiveness. These measurements characterize the quality of respiratory support during neonatal transition and may provide early markers of lung injury.
  • Lung Ultrasound:

Serial lung ultrasound examinations will be performed during the first 28 days of life.

The Lung Ultrasound Score (LUS) will be calculated using standardized scoring systems reflecting pulmonary aeration.

Additionally, diaphragmatic ultrasound will quantify:

  • diaphragmatic excursion,
  • diaphragmatic contractility,
  • respiratory muscle function. These measurements provide information regarding pulmonary aeration and respiratory muscle performance.
  • Targeted Neonatal Echocardiography Targeted neonatal echocardiography (TnEcho) will be performed repeatedly from birth until 36 weeks' postmenstrual age.

Cardiovascular assessments include evaluation of:

  • ductus arteriosus,
  • pulmonary artery pressure,
  • ventricular function,
  • pulmonary vascular resistance,
  • systemic blood flow,
  • pulmonary hypertension,
  • cardiac output. Cardiopulmonary interactions are expected to influence respiratory outcomes and may contribute to BPD development.
  • Forced Oscillation Technique The Forced Oscillation Technique (FOT) will be performed during the first two postnatal weeks to assess respiratory mechanics.

Primary measurements include respiratory system reactance and resistance. Additional follow-up assessments will be performed at approximately 3 years and 5 years of age to investigate long-term pulmonary function in survivors.

  • Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist In infants receiving NAVA ventilation, the electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi) will be continuously recorded.

Variables include:

  • peak EAdi,
  • minimum EAdi,
  • neural respiratory drive,
  • breathing effort. These measurements quantify respiratory muscle activation and patient-ventilator interaction.
  • Electrical Impedance Tomography Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) will be performed repeatedly during the first 14 postnatal days.

EIT provides continuous bedside imaging of regional lung ventilation without ionizing radiation.

Derived parameters include:

  • center of ventilation,
  • ventilation distribution,
  • global inhomogeneity index,
  • overdistension,
  • atelectasis/collapse,
  • regional ventilation delay,
  • end-expiratory lung impedance changes. Measurements will also be obtained during clinically indicated PEEP or continuous distending pressure (CDP) optimization procedures.
  • Proteomic Analysis Blood plasma and tracheal aspirate samples will be collected at predefined intervals during the first 28 days of life whenever clinically indicated samples are obtained.

Proteomic analyses will investigate inflammatory mediators, growth factors, extracellular matrix proteins, and additional molecular biomarkers associated with lung injury and repair.

The aim is to identify molecular signatures associated with subsequent development of BPD.

  • Clinical Data Collection

Clinical variables routinely collected during hospitalization include:

  • gestational age,
  • birth weight,
  • sex,
  • antenatal corticosteroid exposure,
  • Apgar scores,
  • surfactant administration,
  • respiratory support,
  • ventilator settings,
  • oxygen supplementation,
  • respiratory severity score,
  • duration of invasive ventilation,
  • duration of non-invasive respiratory support,
  • postnatal corticosteroid therapy,
  • pulmonary hypertension,
  • patent ductus arteriosus,
  • late-onset sepsis,
  • necrotizing enterocolitis,
  • intraventricular hemorrhage,
  • retinopathy of prematurity,
  • survival,
  • duration of hospitalization.

Statistical Analysis:

Continuous variables will be summarized using appropriate descriptive statistics according to their distribution.

Categorical variables will be presented as frequencies and percentages.

Novel physiological indicators will first be correlated with the Respiratory Severity Score (RSS), calculated as:

RSS = Mean Airway Pressure × Fraction of Inspired Oxygen (MAP × FiO₂) Correlation analyses will use Pearson or Spearman coefficients depending on data distribution.

The predictive ability of each novel indicator for BPD will be evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

For each parameter, the following will be calculated:

  • area under the ROC curve (AUC),
  • optimal cut-off values,
  • sensitivity,
  • specificity,
  • positive predictive value,
  • negative predictive value,
  • likelihood ratios. Logistic regression analyses will be performed to investigate associations between candidate predictors and BPD.

Initially, univariable logistic regression models will be fitted for each predictor separately.

Subsequently, multivariable logistic regression models will evaluate combinations of physiological variables while adjusting for important clinical covariates such as gestational age, birth weight, sex, and antenatal corticosteroid exposure.

Model performance will be assessed using:

  • C-statistic (AUC),
  • calibration,
  • odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals,
  • likelihood ratio tests,
  • internal validation where appropriate. Mutual correlations among novel biomarkers will also be investigated to determine complementary or overlapping information provided by the different technologies.

Primary Outcomes:

  • Correlation between each indicator and the Respiratory Severity Score.
  • Diagnostic accuracy of each predictor for bronchopulmonary dysplasia as assessed by receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Secondary Outcomes:

Secondary analyses include:

  • prediction of BPD using individual physiological parameters;
  • comparison of multivariable prediction models;
  • identification of the strongest independent predictors of BPD;
  • comparison of physiological measurements in intubated and non-intubated infants;
  • longitudinal changes in lung ultrasound, diaphragmatic ultrasound, targeted echocardiography, forced oscillation measurements, electrical diaphragmatic activity, electrical impedance tomography, and proteomic biomarkers during the first four postnatal weeks;
  • physiological changes observed during routine PEEP or continuous distending pressure optimization procedures;
  • effects of respiratory interventions, surfactant administration, corticosteroid therapy, and other treatments on physiological measurements;
  • associations between physiological markers and major neonatal morbidities;
  • survival until hospital discharge;
  • respiratory outcomes during early childhood;
  • longitudinal pulmonary function assessed by Forced Oscillation Technique at 3 and 5 years of age.

Expected Significance:

This study will comprehensively evaluate several innovative physiological monitoring techniques within a single cohort of extremely preterm infants. By integrating respiratory mechanics, lung imaging, cardiovascular assessment, respiratory muscle activity, ventilation distribution, and molecular biomarkers, the study aims to identify early predictors of bronchopulmonary dysplasia that outperform currently available clinical indicators.

Improved early risk stratification may facilitate individualized respiratory management, optimize therapeutic decision-making, improve patient selection for future interventional studies, and ultimately contribute to reducing the burden of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in extremely preterm infants.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Preterm infants born at <26 weeks' gestational age, as determined by the best obstetric estimate based on the first day of the last menstrual period and/or first-trimester ultrasonography.
  • Admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of the Medical University of Vienna immediately after birth.
  • Written informed consent obtained prospectively from a parent or other legally authorized representative prior to study participation.

Exclusion criteria

  • Major congenital anomaly or anticipated alternative cause for respiratory failure.

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD)

    Time frame: At 36 weeks' postmenstrual age

    No BPD: no support. BPD grade 1: nasal cannula ≤ 2 L/min. BPD grade 2: nasal cannula > 2 L/min or noninvasive positive airway pressure. BPD grade 3: invasive mechanical ventilation.

  2. Respiratory Severity Score (RSS)

    Time frame: Day of Life 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 21and Day 28.

    Daily median Respiratory Severity Score (RSS), calculated as the product of the mean airway pressure (MAP, cmH₂O) and the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂), using all recorded ventilator settings during a 24-hour period.

  3. Peak inspiratory pressure (RFM-PIP)

    Time frame: First hour of life.

    Peak inspiratory pressure during neonatal transition and resuscitation assessed by the Respiratory Function Monitor (RFM)

  4. Expiratory tidal volume (RFM-VTe)

    Time frame: Frist hour of life

    Expiratory tidal volume during neonatal transition and resuscitation assessed by the Respiratory Function Monitor (RFM)

  5. Lung Ultrasound Score (LUS)

    Time frame: Day of life 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, and Day 28.

    Lung ultrasound is performed in six lung regions, comprising the upper anterior, lower anterior, and lateral regions of each hemithorax. Each region is assigned a score from 0 to 3 according to the most severe ultrasound pattern observed: 0, normal aeration with A-lines; 1, at least three separated B-lines; 2, coalescent B-lines or a white-lung pattern; and 3, extended consolidation. The regional scores were summed to obtain a total LUS score ranging from 0 (minimum) to 18 (maximum), with higher scores indicating more severe loss of lung aeration.

  6. Diaphragm shortening fraction (DSF)

    Time frame: Day of life 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, and Day 28.

    In M-Mode, the minimal (TET) and the maximal thickness (TIT) during a breathing cycle are measured three times and mean values are considered for the diaphragmatic shortening fraction (DSF) which is determined by the following formula: DSF(%) = 100x(TIT-TET)/TET.

  7. Patent Ductus Arteriosus (PDA) status

    Time frame: Day of life 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 28, 32 weeks gestational age (GA) and 36 weeks GA

    PDA status (TnEcho): open/closed (binary variable)

  8. PDA - shunt pattern

    Time frame: Day of life 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 28, 32 weeks gestational age (GA) and 36 weeks GA

    PDA - shunt direction (TnECHO): non restrictive left-to-right, restrictive left-to-right, bi-directional, right-to-left, no shunt

  9. Patent Ductus Arteriosus Score

    Time frame: Day of life 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 28, 32 weeks gestational age (GA) and 36 weeks GA

    Patent Ductus Arteriosus Score (PDA Score): Each item is assigned 0, 1, or 2 points. The total score is calculated as the sum of all item scores, ranging from 0 (minimum) to 12 points (maximum). A higher score indicates greater hemodynamic compromise due to the PDA.

    Items: Mitral E-wave velocity (cm/s), IVRT (ms), pulmonary vein D-wave velocity (cm/s), LA:Ao ratio, LVO (mL/min/kg), and descending aortic flow and/or celiac/middle cerebral artery flow.

  10. ECHO-Indices of pulmonary hypertension

    Time frame: Day of life 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 28, 32 weeks gestational age (GA) and 36 weeks GA

    tricuspid regurgitation jet-derived right ventricular systolic pressure

  11. ECHO-Indices of pulmonary hypertension

    Time frame: Day of life 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 28, 32 weeks gestational age (GA) and 36 weeks GA

    interventricular septal curvature represented as eccentricity index

  12. ECHO-Indices of pulmonary hypertension

    Time frame: Day of life 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 28, 32 weeks gestational age (GA) and 36 weeks GA

    pulmonary vascular resistance indices derived from right ventricular ejection time and pulmonary artery acceleration time

  13. Respiratory Oscillometry

    Time frame: Day of life 1, Day 3, Day 7 and Day 14 (when intubated) and 3 and 5 years of age

    Respiratory reactance (Xrs) [cmH2 O⋅sec/Lt]

  14. Respiratory Oscillometry

    Time frame: Day of life 1, Day 3, Day 7 and Day 14 (when intubated) and 3 and 5 years of age

    Respiratory resistance (Rrs) [cmH2 O⋅s/L].

  15. Neurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA)

    Time frame: Day of life 3, Day 7 and Day 14

    NAVA Level [cmH2 O/μV]

    Values will be averaged over a representative period during which the patient is in a restful state.

  16. Neurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA)

    Time frame: Day of life 3, Day 7 and Day 14

    Edimax (maximum electrical activity of the diaphragm during inspiration) [μV] Edimin (minmal electrical activity of the diaphragm during inspiration) [μV] All values will be averaged over a representative period during which the patient is in a restful state.

  17. Neurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA)

    Time frame: Day of life 3, Day 7 and Day 14

    Inspiration time [sec]

  18. Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT)

    Time frame: Day of life 7 and Day 14

    Center of ventilation: CoV

  19. Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT)

    Time frame: Time Frame: Day of life 7 and Day 14

    Regional ventilation delay: RVD

  20. Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT)

    Time frame: Day of life 7 and Day 14

    Global inhomogeneity index: GI

  21. Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT)

    Time frame: Day of life 7 and Day 14

    Regional respiratory system compliance

  22. Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT)

    Time frame: Day of life 7 and Day 14

    Regional time constant

  23. Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT)

    Time frame: Day of life 7 and Day 14

    VQ matching

  24. Proteomics

    Time frame: Day of life 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 14, and Day 28.

    Plasma and tracheal protein profiles from 50 µL blood (approximately one drop of blood on a dried blood spot card) and 1 mL of tracheal aspirate.

  25. ECHO-Indices of volume loading

    Time frame: Day of life 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 28, 32 weeks gestational age (GA) and 36 weeks GA

    pulmonary vein velocity [m/s]

  26. ECHO-Indices of volume loading

    Time frame: Day of life 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 28, 32 weeks gestational age (GA) and 36 weeks GA

    mitral inflow E/A

  27. ECHO-Indices of volume loading

    Time frame: Day of life 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 28, 32 weeks gestational age (GA) and 36 weeks GA

    isovolumetric relaxation time

  28. ECHO-Indices of qualitative ventricular function

    Time frame: Day of life 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 28, 32 weeks gestational age (GA) and 36 weeks GA

    TAPSE (Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion) [sec]

  29. ECHO-Indices of qualitative ventricular function

    Time frame: Day of life 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 28, 32 weeks gestational age (GA) and 36 weeks GA

    Fractional shortening (FS) [%]

  30. ECHO-Indices of qualitative ventricular function

    Time frame: Day of life 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 28, 32 weeks gestational age (GA) and 36 weeks GA

    Left and right cardiac output [mL/min/kg]

  31. ECHO-Indices of qualitative ventricular function

    Time frame: Day of life 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 28, 32 weeks gestational age (GA) and 36 weeks GA

    Global strain

Secondary outcomes

  1. Composite outcome: Death or Grade 3 BPD

    Time frame: At 36 weeks' postmenstrual age

    Death: death before 36 weeks' postmenstrual age BPD grade 3: invasive mechanical ventilation at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age

  2. Ventilation parameters

    Time frame: Time to 36 weeks' postmenstrual age

    Days of invasive ventilaion Days of non-invasive ventilation (excluding CPAP) Days of CPAP Days of HFNC Days of FiO2-supplement

  3. Major morbidities

    Time frame: Time to 36 weeks' postmenstrual age

    necrotizing enterocolitis sepsis intraventricular hemorrhage periventricular leukomalacia retinopathy of prematurity

  4. Neurological outcome

    Time frame: at two and five years of corrected age

    Neurodevelopmental outcomes at two and five years of corrected age were assessed using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development during standard follow-up visits.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Tobias Werther, MD, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+43140400 67400

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Medical University of Vienna

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Novel Predictive Indicators for Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Extremely Preterm Infants

Acronym: EPIRESP

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2029
Study completion
2030
First posted
Aug 18, 2026
Registry last updated
Aug 18, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.