Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Withdrawn

NCT Number: NCT06091514

Connected Cardiology to Control Cardiac Rythm

New-onset of atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial arrythmia (AA) in general, is important as it exposes patients to stroke or other embolic complications not to mention the risk of heart failure. AF detection in high risk populations such as patients with a recent stroke or TIA or, symptomatic patients with multiple risk factors for AF, is performed with long-term electrocardiography monitoring using frequently implantable loop recorders (ILR). These recorders have their own limitations related to the invasive nature of the device implanted under the skin of the chest with limited acceptation by the patients. Smart watches appear as useful alternatives, but they need to be evaluated in an all-comer population of patients highly exposed to AF, different from the large population studies conducted in healthy young adults with a low incidence of AF. The unique features of CardiacSense Medical System suggest that we could have an accurate noninvasive detection of AF in a selected population very much exposed to the risk of atrial fibrillation, the most frequent atrial arrhythmia.

Why the study stopped: Decision by the manufacturer
Withdrawn

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

About this study

Study design :

This clinical investigation is a comparative, non-randomised, one group, controlled study.

Each patient represents its own control. The study will envolve 400 participants

Hypothesis :

Our hypothesis is that CardiacSense Medical System is an effective, safe, and better accepted alternative for detecting atrial fibrillation (AF) in a high-risk population than implantable loop recorders (ILRs).

Population :

Any patient aged 18 years or more, with an ILR implanted for the detection of AF will be eligible. The time of implantation will not matter as long as the batteries work. Each patient will be proposed a CS Medical Watch for a period corresponding to the period at risk of AF.

Main objective :

To compare the performance of the CardiacSense Medical Watch by pulse plethysmography (PPG) only to the gold standard method of ILR monitoring, to detect AF that lasts 5 minutes or more, in a population of patients at high risk of paroxysmal AF.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient aged 18 years or more
  • Patient having signed free, informed, and written consent
  • Patient presenting one of the following situations :
  • Post-stroke or TIA patient with an already in place ILR
  • Patient with symptoms evocative of AF (e.g. increased heart rate, chest pain) with an already in place ILR
  • Post-PFO closure patient with an already in place ILR
  • Patient in sinus rhythm treated for the prevention of paroxysmal AF with an already in place ILR
  • Patient at high risk of AF (at the discretion of the investigator) with an already in place ILR
  • Patient with a period of risk of AF ≥ 3 months.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patient under legal protection
  • Pregnant and/or breastfeeding women
  • Patient with pacemakers, or ICD
  • Patient with blood flow deficiency-related conditions
  • Patient with tattoo or injured skin on the wrist
  • Patient with tremors or otherwise unable to remain still for 15 minutes
  • Patient without two hands and sufficient fingers to complete the study.

Treatment and study plan

CS Medical Watch

Device

The Use of the CS Medical Watch during the participation period of the clinical investigation (between 3 and 12 months according to the period at risk of AF).

Specific questionnaire

Other

Specific questionnaire during the last study visit (takes place at M3 to M12 according to the period at risk of AF)

Primary outcomes

  1. The total number of episodes AF that lasts 5 min or more recorded on long-term monitoring

    Time frame: between 3 and 12 months according to the period at risk of AF

    The total number of episodes AF that lasts 5 min or more recorded on long-term monitoring using the CardiacSense Medical Watch by pulse plethysmography (PPG) only vs the gold standard method of ILR ECG recording, over the same period of monitoring by the two devices for each patient.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The total number of AA episodes that lasts 5 min or more recorded on long-term monitoring

    Time frame: between 3 and 12 months according to the period at risk of AF

    The total number of AA episodes that lasts 5 min or more detected by PPG and confirmed by ECG measurement of the CardiacSense Medical Watch (vs. ILR ECG recording) over the same period of monitoring by the two devices for each patient.

  2. The total number of episodes AF that lasts 5 min or more recorded on long-term monitoring

    Time frame: between 3 and 12 months according to the period at risk of AF

    Same primary endpoint for symptomatic patients vs. asymptomatic patients

  3. The total duration of AF episodes that lasts 5 min or more

    Time frame: between 3 and 12 months according to the period at risk of AF

    Total duration of AF episodes that lasts 5 min or more / total duration of monitoring expressed in % for each device (PPG CS watch only vs. ILR ECG recording).

  4. Incidence and severity of CS device vs ILR devices

    Time frame: between 3 and 12 months according to the period at risk of AF

    Related Adverse Events and incidents during the patient participation

  5. Degree of invasiveness, comfort, and ease of use of both devices

    Time frame: between 3 and 12 months according to the period at risk of AF

    Description : measured using specific questionnaires for the study

  6. Medico-economic evaluation according to the AP-HP hospital costs

    Time frame: between 3 and 12 months according to the period at risk of AF

    • The cost of each medical device (considering the replacement when needed over the study period for each patient)
    • The cost for extra-consultation/hospitalization for surgery, complication, or education.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Other

Collaborators

  • Action Research Group
  • Hôpital Lariboisière Fernand Widal

Registry information

Acronym: C4R

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Oct 19, 2023
Registry last updated
Aug 25, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.