Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Withdrawn

NCT Number: NCT05717504

Sweet spoT for cArdiac Rhythm monitorinG After sTrokE

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the use of long-term vs. shorter-term heart monitoring to detect atrial fibrillation after stroke.

Patients will be implanted with a loop recorder and will have study follow-up at 3-, 6- an 12-months after implantation.

The investigators will evaluate 24 patients, between the 3 centers, in the same way the investigators plan to evaluate a larger number of participants (>1000) in a future study. This will allow us to learn if such a study is possible, identify potential implementation challenges, and develop strategies to overcome those difficulties.

Why the study stopped: Withdrawn before enrollment because new clinical evidence made the study question no longer relevant.
Withdrawn

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common heart rhythm disorder. Its name comes from the fibrillation (i.e. quivering) of the two upper chambers (atria) of the heart instead of a coordinated contraction, causing a rapid, irregular heart rate. This irregular contraction is ineffective, leading to the development clots in the heart. These clots can travel through the bloodstream until they get stuck in a brain artery. Millions of brain cells that depend on the oxygen supplied by the blocked artery die within minutes. This is known as a stroke. Strong blood thinners known as anticoagulants can lower stroke risk by 64% in AF patients when the AF is detected on an electrocardiogram (ECG) or if it lasts more than 24h on a heart monitor. Therefore, doctors use cardiac monitors to record the heartbeats of stroke patients for up to 3 years. It was historically thought, but not proven, that if AF was found in stroke patients, using anticoagulants could prevent a second stroke. However, recent information suggests that using cardiac monitors in stroke patients increases AF detection and anticoagulants prescription without a reduction in the number of new strokes. The failure to prevent a second stroke is likely the consequence of cardiac monitors sometimes detecting very short-duration AFs, which may have a low risk of stroke. If AFs last only for a few minutes or hours, anticoagulants may not be needed.

Patients with a stroke and not know atrial fibrillation will be implanted with a loop recorder and randomized in two groups (disclosure arm and non-disclosure arm). Patients will have phone follow-up visits at 3, 6 and 12 months after implantation. A quality-of-life survey will be performed at the last study visit.

This study will assess if it is possible to organize a large clinical trial comparing the use of long-term vs. shorter-term heart monitoring. The investigators will evaluate 24 patients, between the 3 centers, in the same way, the investigators plan to evaluate a larger number of participants (>1000) in a future study. This will allow us to learn if such a study is possible, identify potential implementation challenges, and develop strategies to overcome those difficulties.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients with cortical or subcortical, cryptogenic or non-cryptogenic acute ischemic stroke

Exclusion criteria

  • AF on 24-h inpatient or Holter monitoring
  • Atrial or ventricular thrombus
  • Other major-risk cardioembolic sources (e.g., mechanical valve)
  • Other indications (e.g., venous thromboembolism) or contraindications for OACs.

Treatment and study plan

Implantable Loop Recorder

Device

Patients will be implanted with a loop recorder. Patients will be given the choice of remove the loop recorder after the 12-months follow-up visit or at the end of its battery life (approximately 3 years)

Quality of life survey

Other

A quality of life survey will be performed at the end of the follow-up period. The survey will be done over the phone or in person if the follow-up visit is in person.

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of patients enrolled at in 6 months

    Time frame: 6 months

    Median and interquartile range recruitment rate. We will use this rate to estimate the number of sites and enrollment duration required for a larger RCT.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Screened, declined and dropouts.

    Time frame: 2 years

    • proportion and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of stroke patients needed to screen per patient invited to participate
    • proportion and 95% CI of patients declining participation
    • proportion and 95% CI of dropouts at the end of follow-up.
  2. Number of clinical endpoint events per diagnostic arm

    Time frame: 2 years

    The investigators will apply standard descriptive statistics to report the number of clinical endpoint events per diagnostic arm. The primary composite efficacy endpoint to be used in larger RCT is stroke recurrence (ischemic or hemorrhagic), systemic embolism, MACE (myocardial infarction and admission for decompensated AF or heart failure), and death. The primary safety endpoint will be major bleeding (ISTH definition).These data and results from prior studies will be used to estimate the final sample size and required number of sites for the larger RCT.

  3. Quality of life survey analysis

    Time frame: 2 years

    The investigators will perform a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the results of the ILR-specific quality of life survey. The analysis will be reviewed by the team and PWLE. We will use this information to improve patients' experiences in a larger RCT

  4. AF timing of diagnosis

    Time frame: 2 years

    The investigators will evaluate different measures of AF timing of diagnosis :Time to first AF diagnosis (DD:HH)

  5. AF burden (1)

    Time frame: 2 years

    The investigators will evaluate different measures of AF burden:

    Total AF burden at 3, 6, and 12 months post-ILR insertion (sum of the duration of all AF episodes, HH:MM:SS).

    Characterizing these measures will allow us to choose the best AF burden definition for a larger RCT.

  6. AF burden (2)

    Time frame: 2 years

    The investigators will evaluate different measures of AF burden:

    Maximum duration of the longest AF episode. Characterizing these measures will allow us to choose the best AF burden definition for a larger RCT.

  7. AF burden (3)

    Time frame: 2 years

    The investigators will evaluate different measures of AF burden:

    Relative AF burden (total AF burden/net monitoring time), (4) AF Pattern (number of AF episodes and time of occurrence), (5) Other ECG monitoring findings (premature atrial complexes, interatrial block, etc.). Characterizing these measures will allow us to choose the best AF burden definition for a larger RCT.

  8. AF burden (4)

    Time frame: 2 years

    The investigators will evaluate different measures of AF burden:

    AF Pattern (number of AF episodes and time of occurrence). Characterizing these measures will allow us to choose the best AF burden definition for a larger RCT.

  9. AF burden (5)

    Time frame: 2 years

    The investigators will evaluate different measures of AF burden:

    Other ECG monitoring findings (premature atrial complexes, interatrial block, etc.). Characterizing these measures will allow us to choose the best AF burden definition for a larger RCT.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Luciano A. Sposato

Other

Collaborators

  • Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada

Registry information

Official study title

STARGATE (Sweet spoT for cArdiac Rhythm monitorinG After sTrokE) Pilot Trial: A Pilot-feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial

Acronym: STARGATE

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2025
First posted
Feb 8, 2023
Registry last updated
Sep 18, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.