Centre Orthopédique Médico-Chirurgical de Dracy Le Fort
Dracy-le-Fort, France
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT05818891
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the 10-year performance of the MPACT DM cup in the treatment of patients requiring total hip arthroplasty.
The primary endpoint is the 10-year life span of the prosthesis according to the Kaplan Meier curve.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–80 year
All sexes
Observational
Dracy-le-Fort, France
Location status: Recruiting
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the 10-year performance of the MPACT DM cup in the treatment of patients requiring total hip arthroplasty evaluated through the Kaplan Meier curve.
The secondary objectives of the study are:
Secondary endpoints were:
The arithmetic summation of these "risk factors" will lead to a final "score", defining the adaptation of the prosthesis to the bone sleeve at the time the images are taken, and which may naturally vary with time, either positively, if the fixation, which was precarious at the time, stabilizes (secondary osteoinduction by Hydroxyapatite of initial fibrosis zones, for example), or negatively in the presence of an evolving destabilization (there is obviously no negative score). The approach is similar for the femur and for the acetabulum.
❖ Collection of intraoperative and postoperative complications. Complications, such as infection, loosening, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), fracture, as well as other unexpected complications, will be evaluated.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: 10 years after the index surgery
Analysis with Kaplan Meier curve considering the revisions of the implants
Time frame: pre-op, 3 months, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years and 10 years after the index surgery
Evaluation of the Harris Hip Score with the analysis of the operated hip for pain, function, mobility and stability and a deformity analysis.
The HHS is a measure of dysfunction so the higher the score, the better the outcome for the individual. Results can be recorded and calculated online. The maximum score possible is 100. Results can be interpreted with the following: <70 = poor result; 70-80 = fair, 80-90 = good, and 90-100 = excellent
Evaluation of standard radiographs from the front and side. Periprosthetic edging and osteolysis will be evaluated using Delee and Charnley zones for the acetabular component and Gruen zones for the femoral component.
Time frame: Intra-op, 3 months, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years and 10 years after the index surgery
Collecting all the adverse events through time
Collection of intraoperative and postoperative complications. Complications, such as infection, loosening, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), fracture, as well as other unexpected complications, will be evaluated.
Time frame: pre-op, 3 months, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years and 10 years after the index surgery
Evaluation of implant stability and fit using the ARA score. This score is used to determine whether the implant causes changes in the surrounding bone structures. If signs occur, they can be considered either as "neutral", showing a simple adaptation and not reducing the result, or as "negative" to varying degrees. The maximum ARA score is 6 points, negative points from 1 to 4 can be attributed for each of these "negative" signs.
The arithmetic summation of these "risk factors" will lead to a final "score", defining the adaptation of the prosthesis to the bone sleeve at the time the images are taken, and which may naturally vary with time, either positively, if the fixation, which was precarious at the time, stabilizes (secondary osteoinduction by Hydroxyapatite of initial fibrosis zones, for example), or negatively in the presence of an evolving destabilization (there is obviously no negative score). The approach is similar for the femur and for the acetabulum.
Interested in participating?
Request InfoMedacta International SA
Industry
Prospective, Multicenter, Non-Controlled, Non-Randomized, Open-Label Study To Evaluate The Efficacy And Performance Of The Mpact® Dual Mobility Hemispheric Cup
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05221554
Arthritis, Computer-assisted Surgery
London, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT07815145
Postoperative Analgesia, Quadroiliac Plane Block
Tanta, El-Gharbia, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07798830
Deep Iliacus Plane Block, Postoperative Analgesia
Tanta, El-Gharbia, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07537036
Analgesic Efficacy, Erector Spinae Plane Block
Tanta, El-Gharbia, Egypt
View Trial Details