National Institutes of Health Clinical Center
Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, United States
NCT Number: NCT03206086
Background:
Fanconi anemia is a genetic disease. Some people with it have reduced blood cell counts. This means their bone marrow no longer works properly. These people may need blood transfusions for anemia (low red blood cells) or low platelet counts or bleeding. Researchers want to see if a new drug will help people with this disease.
Objective:
To find out if a new drug, eltrombopag, is effective in people with Fanconi anemia. To know how long the drug needs to be given to improve blood counts.
Eligibility:
People at least 6 years old with Fanconi anemia with reduced blood cell counts.
Design:
Participants will be screened with blood and urine tests. They will repeat this before starting to take the study drug.
Participants will take eltrombopag pills by mouth once a day for 24 weeks. They will be monitored closely for side effects.
Participants will have blood tests every 4 weeks while on eltrombopag.
Participants will visit NIH 3 months and 6 months after starting eltrombopag. At these visits, participants will:
Answer questions about their medical history, how they are feeling, and their quality of life
Have a physical exam
Have blood and urine tests
Have a bone marrow sample taken by needle from the hip. The area will be numbed.
If participants blood cell counts improve, they might join the extended access part of the study. They may continue eltrombopag for up to 3 years, with dose adjustment, taper, interruption, discontinuation, or re-initiation according to protocol criteria.
After 24 weeks of treatment, if there is no improvement in blood cell counts, participants will stop taking eltrombopag. They will return for an optional follow-up visit that repeats the study visits.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me6 year–99 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, United States
Fanconi anemia (FA) is a rare genetic disease that often presents as a bone marrow failure (BMF) syndrome but also can affect any other organ. Etiologically, loss of function mutations in more than 21 different gene members of the FA core complex (i.e. FANCA-FANCV) have been associated with FA. The FA core complex is involved in interstrand cross-link DNA damage repair during cell division. Impaired DNA repair causes genomic instability which consequently can cause apoptosis of the cell or malignant transformation. In addition to impaired DNA repair mechanisms, FA cells exhibit increased sensitivity to pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g. IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha) and elevated levels of these cytokines have been associated with bone marrow failure in subjects with FA and other inherited bone marrow failure syndromes.
Patients with FA may present with congenital anomalies, such as microcephaly or short stature. However, the failure of the hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) compartment to produce sufficient numbers of peripheral blood cells, and progression to myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) are the greatest risk factors for morbidity and mortality, particular in young patients with FA. In a few reported cases, spontaneous somatic reversion of inherited mutations has resulted in a selective growth advantage of corrected HSCs that subsequently restored hematopoiesis. However, therapeutic options are limited in FA. Although HSC transplantation outcomes have significantly improved over the past two decades, donor availability, graft failure, and FA-specific transplant toxicities are still significant hurdles towards a curative treatment of FA-associated BMF. Moreover, attempts at genetic correction of FA are not yet ready for patient care.
The thrombopoietin (TPO) mimetic eltrombopag (EPAG) has recently been shown to be effective in restoring tri-lineage hematopoiesis in patients with treatment refractory acquired severe aplastic anemia (SAA). Of particular interest for patients with FA is the observation that EPAG also improves the repair of double strand DNA breaks, a mechanism that is impaired in patients with FA. Additionally, our pre-clinical studies indicate that EPAG evades IFN-gamma blockade of signal transduction from the TPO receptor (cMPL) resulting in improved survival and proliferation of HSCs. Based on these clinical and pre-clinical studies, we hypothesize that EPAG will improve peripheral blood cell counts in patients with FA and thus reduce morbidity and mortality.
This phase II clinical trial proposes to treat patients with FA for 6 months with EPAG to assess safety and efficacy at improving hematological manifestations of FA. Responders at 6 months will be able to continue EPAG on the extension part of this protocol for an additional 3 years. Translational studies will explore EPAG effects on DNA repair activity, apoptosis, global transcriptome and TPO signaling pathways in patient's hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Transfusion Units: Single donor apheresis platelets have become the primary source of platelets in the US. Therefore, one transfused, single donor platelet apheresis product is considered 1 unit for protocol purposes. In the rare case that a patient received pooled platelet products, each completed platelet transfusion (1 bag) independent of donor units pooled, will be counted as 1 unit transfused. In analogy, each completed platelet transfusion will be counted as one unit in pediatric patients independent of the administered volume.
Exclusion criteria
Daily dose (first 6 months)
Other names: EPAG
Time frame: 6 months (+/- 14 day window)
Defined as one or more of the following:
Peripheral Blood Response:
Bone Marrow Response:
Time frame: Up to 6 months (+/- 14 day window)
The table reports the number of participants with at least one related adverse event overall and, for each event term, the number by maximum grade (Grade 1-2 or Grade 3 or higher). Each participant was counted once in the overall row and once per event term at the highest grade experienced; event-term categories are not mutually exclusive.
Adverse events were assessed by the investigator as possibly, probably, or definitely related to eltrombopag, and were graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0: Grade 1 (mild), Grade 2 (moderate), Grade 3 (severe or medically significant), Grade 4 (life-threatening), and Grade 5 (death related to adverse event).
Time frame: Month 3 (+/- 14 day window)
Participants with an evaluable Month 3 assessment were responders if they met at least one criterion:
Time frame: From entry into the extension phase at Month 6 through up to 3 years of extension-phase follow-up, corresponding to up to Month 42 after initiation of eltrombopag
Among participants who met the protocol-defined response criteria at Month 6 and entered the extension phase, the number who subsequently lost a previously achieved hematologic response. Relapse was assessed using serial peripheral blood counts, transfusion requirements, and bone marrow evaluations obtained during protocol follow-up. Each participant was counted once at the first documented relapse.
Time frame: From baseline through the end of study follow-up, up to 42 months after initiation of eltrombopag
Number of participants who developed at least one new cytogenetic abnormality and/or new morphologic evidence of progression to myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia after baseline. Clonal evolution was assessed using serial bone marrow morphology and chromosomal analysis by standard cytogenetic techniques. A myelodysplastic syndrome fluorescence in situ hybridization panel could be performed when clinically indicated and at the principal investigator's discretion. Each participant was counted once in the overall measure.
Time frame: From entry into the extension phase at Month 6 through up to 3 years of extension-phase treatment and follow-up, corresponding to up to Month 42 after initiation of eltrombopag
Among participants who entered the extension phase, the number who experienced one or more hematologic or nonhematologic adverse events during extended eltrombopag therapy and follow-up. Adverse events were graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 and summarized by event term, maximum grade, seriousness, investigator-assessed relationship to eltrombopag, and action taken with study treatment. Each participant was counted once per adverse-event term at the maximum reported grade.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3 (+/- 14 day window), and Month 6 (+/- 14 day window)
Within-participant change from baseline in health-related quality-of-life scores at Months 3 and 6. Age-appropriate adult, pediatric, or parent-proxy questionnaires were used, as applicable. The protocol-specified measures included:
Changes from baseline were summarized separately for each instrument or domain and evaluated overall and in relation to hematologic treatment response.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3 (+/- 14 day window), and Month 6 (+/- 14 day window)
Number of participants with clinically identified findings involving organ systems commonly affected in Fanconi anemia at baseline, Month 3, and Month 6. Prespecified categories included skin lesions, endocrine dysfunction, and new head and neck, oropharyngeal, gastrointestinal, anogenital, or skin cancers. Findings at Months 3 and 6 were compared with baseline to identify newly diagnosed, worsened, improved, or unchanged abnormalities. Participants were counted once within each applicable category at each assessment.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify MeNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Nih
Eltrombopag for Patients With Fanconi Anemia
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00542373
Anemia, Anemia, Aplastic
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04437771
Anemia, Anemia, Aplastic
Madrid, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT07005297
Abnormalities, Multiple, Anemia
Rockville, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00027274
Anemia, Anemia, Aplastic
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details