Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06068244

3D-printed Crowns Versus Zirconia Crowns for Primary Molars

The aim of the present study is to compare between 3D-printed crowns and prefabricated zirconia crowns for restoring pulpally-treated primary molars regarding the following aspects:

1. In vivo:

Evaluate the clinical outcome of 3D printed crowns in comparison to prefabricated zirconia crowns in pulpally-treated primary molars as well as parent satisfaction. 2. In vitro:

Comparative analysis of fracture resistance and marginal gap of 3D printed crowns and prefabricated zirconia crowns

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

4 year–7 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Ain shams university

Cairo, Egypt

About this study

in vitro part :

All selected primary molars should fulfill the following criteria:

  • Freshly extracted molars with at least three sound walls.
  • Retain at least one third of their roots Teeth preparation All soft tissue debris will be removed with a hand scaler and teeth will be disinfected, and then stored in distilled water at 4 degrees Celsius until the start of the study.

Pulpotomy procedures will be performed to the extracted molars and the molars will be filled. Then, they will be randomly allocated into two groups.

Group 1: Will receive 3D-printed crowns Group 2: Will receive prefabricated zirconia crowns The specimens will be embedded perpendicularly in Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) cubes with the occlusal surface parallel to the ground using acrylic resin extending 2mm below the cementoenamel junction.

Evaluations: teeth in both groups will be evaluated for the following:

  • Marginal gap:

Precementation measurements of the cervical vertical marginal discrepancies will be performed before cementation., Four optical images for each specimen will be captured using a stereomicroscope (Wild 400, Switzerland) at a 32× magnification. Images will then be transferred to the computer software for image analysis.

  • Fracture Resistance:

An axial loading condition through the functional cusp will be defined in the mechanical failure description. Failure-to-fracture strength will be tested with a universal testing machine (LLOYD machine) at a 0.5 mm/sec crosshead speed. Application of a round-end vertical loading tip on the occlusal third of a specimen fixed into a loading apparatus as functional loading simulation.

in vivo part : Teeth will be polished using a polishing paste and brush, and dried before being examined.

A dental mirror will be used for clinical examination under light emitting diode (LED) illumination to confirm the fulfillment of the inclusion criteria of the patient's selection.

  • The molars will be randomly allocated into two equal treatment groups 23/each):
  • Group 1: 3D-printed crowns
  • Group 2: prefabricated zirconia crowns

Pulpotomy procedure for both groups:

<!-- -->

  • Local anesthesia will be administered.
  • Teeth will undergo pulpotomy procedure' as follows:
  • Caries removal will be done using a large size 4 round bur, mounted onto a high-speed hand piece with constant coolant.
  • All access cavity walls will be flared to allow complete exposure of the pulp chamber, and easy undisturbed access to the canals, followed by removal of all the soft pulpal tissue tags by a sharp spoon shaped excavator.
  • Bleeding control will be done using moist cotton pellet with gentle pressure.
  • Formocresol will be applied using a cotton pellet for 3-5 mins, for fixation.
  • The pulp chamber will be filled with re-inforced zinc oxide and eugenol that will be mixed according to manufacturer's instructions.
  • Analgesics will be prescribed to the patient to be taken when needed.

Intervention Group 1:

  • Crown reduction: The teeth will be prepared using taper diamond bur with round end for buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal wall for 0.8- 1 mm, producing a chamfer margin circumferentially, and then, reduction of the occlusal surface will be done using a round wheel to produce occlusal clearance of 1.5 mm.
  • Impression for the preparation will be taken using putty and light poly vinyl siloxane material.
  • The impression will be sent to the lab and the patient will be dismissed.
  • The preparation will be optically scanned in the lab and the crown will be digitally designed using computer designing software.
  • The crown will be printed using 3D printer.
  • The 3D printed crown will be cemented in the 2nd visit.

Control: Group 2:

  • Crown reduction:
  • In order to compensate for the thickness of zirconia crown, reduction will be performed on the mesial, distal, buccal and lingual surfaces of the tooth for 0.7-1.75mm. Reduction will be performed using fine needle stone in the beginning to free the contact from the adjacent teeth then followed by reduction of the other surfaces using a diamond stone.
  • Reduction of the occlusal surface will be performed using a flame stone or wheel stone to produce occlusal clearance of 1.5- 2 mm.
  • All line angles will be checked to remove any sharp line angles.
  • Selection of the matching size from zirconia crowns will be made taking into consideration that the preparation must be free from any undercuts to avoid crown fracture.
  • After checking the selected size of the crowns, it will be removed, dried and cemented to the tooth using resin cement.

Method of evaluation:

After cementation , at baseline ,3rd ,6th and 12th months evaluation of the crowns will be performed clinically using the modified U.S. Public Health Service criteria for retention, marginal integrity and gingival health for both groups. Also, parental satisfaction will be evaluated at end of the study using 5-point likert scale.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Children included in the study should stratify to the following criteria:
  • Age range of children from 4 -7 years.
  • Having at least one vital primary molar with deep carious lesion indicated for pulpotomy or pulpectomy.
  • The expected exfoliation date of the selected primary teeth must be more than 12 months from the start date of the study.

Exclusion criteria

  • a) Uncooperative children who needs sedation or general anesthesia. b) Children with physical, intellectual disability or medical conditions that may complicate treatment.

c) Teeth with poor prognosis due to the presence of an abscess or a sinus, mobility or advanced bone resorption.

d) Presence of internal or external root resorption.

Treatment and study plan

3D printed crowns

Other

3D printed crowns

Zirconia crowns

Other

Nu smile zirconia crowns

Primary outcomes

  1. Gingival health (gingival index)

    Time frame: 1 year follow up for vivo part only

    Gingival index and plaque index

    A gingival index, based on the Loe and Silness scoring criteria (1963). It will be measured by gently inserting the tip of a periodontal probe into the sulcus surrounding each tooth. Scoring as followed:

    0 = Normal (Absence of inflammation)

    • = Mild gingivitis (slight change in color, slight edema. No bleeding on probing)
    • = Moderate gingivitis (redness, edema and glazing. Bleeding on probing)
    • = Severe gingivitis (marked redness and edema; ulceration; tendency to spontaneous bleeding)
    • Gingival index and plaque index.
  2. plaque index

    Time frame: 1year follow up

    Plaque index (PI) (Silness and Loe) PI 0: No observable plaque PI 1: A thin film of plaque is detected at the gingival margin by running a probe or explorer across the tooth surfaces PI 2: A moderate amount of plaque is detected along the gingival margin. Plaque is visible clinically.

    PI 3: Heavy plaque accumulation is detected at the gingival margin and in the interdental Plaque index (PI) (Silness and Loe) PI 0: No observable plaque PI 1: A thin film of plaque is detected at the gingival margin by running a probe or explorer across the tooth surfaces PI 2: A moderate amount of plaque is detected along the gingival margin. Plaque is visible clinically.

    PI 3: Heavy plaque accumulation is detected at the gingival margin and in the interdental

  3. Marginal integrity

    Time frame: 1yeat follow up

    by visual inspection and explorer Alfa: Explorer does not catch or has one way catch when drawn across the restoration/tooth interface.

    Bravo: Explorer falls into crevice when drawn across the restoration/tooth interface, Dentin is not exposed; clinically acceptable.

    Charlie: Dentin or base is exposed along the margin; clinically unacceptable.

  4. crown retention

    Time frame: one year follow up

    Alpha: Bonded Bravo: Debonded Charlie: Lost

  5. In vitro marginal gap

    Time frame: Immediately after samples preparation

    micrometers

  6. in vitro fracture resistance

    Time frame: Immediately after samples preparation

    newton

Secondary outcomes

  1. parent satisfaction

    Time frame: immediately after cementation of crowns

    5-point likert scale.1-very dissatisfied; 2-dissatisfied; 3-neutrally satisfied; 4-satisfied; 5-very satisfied.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ain Shams University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

3D-Printed Crowns Versus Prefabricated Zirconia Crowns for the Restoration of Pulpally-treated Primary Molars; Randomized Clinical Trial and In-Vitro Study

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Oct 5, 2023
Registry last updated
Feb 5, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.