University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Vibhor Krishna, MD, SM
CONTACT
Vibhor Krishna, MD, SM
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Victoria Scott
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT06331052
The investigators propose to advance Vim-FUSA (Ventral Intermediate Nucleus - Focused Ultrasound Ablation) with the support of 3-D tractography, a neuroimaging technique to visually represent nerve tracts within the brain. The investigators hypothesize that 3-D tractography Vim-FUSA will improve the Vim ablation compared to standard Vim-FUSA and prove safe and feasible in the clinical setting. The investigators also hypothesize that intraoperative magnetic resonance (i-MR) monitoring will differentiate ablated tissue from immediate perilesional edema and accurately predict the Vim-FUSA clinical outcomes.
Interested in participating?
Request Info22 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Vibhor Krishna, MD, SM
CONTACT
Vibhor Krishna, MD, SM
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Victoria Scott
CONTACT
Essential tremor (ET) is a common neurological disorder and a leading cause of functional and psychological disabilities that can be difficult to suppress with oral medications, many of which have considerable side effects limiting adequate dosing. As a result, up to 20% of ET patients cannot achieve satisfactory control of their symptoms and must consider interventional options. Focused ultrasound ablation (FUSA) of the ventral intermediate nucleus (Vim) is an FDA-approved and Medicare-reimbursed procedure for ET resistant to medications that can selectively ablate the brain area associated with tremor without the need for surgical incisions or anesthesia. The success of Vim-FUSA depends on the ability to accurately ablate 70% of the Vim volume without lesioning neighboring structures, a goal that is complicated by technical challenges in three critical phases of the procedure: planning (identifying the Vim location and extension); delivery (ablating the Vim volume with adequate accuracy); and monitoring (confirming Vim ablation with reliable intraoperative imaging). The investigators propose to advance Vim-FUSA with the support of 3-D tractography, a neuroimaging technique to visually represent nerve tracts within the brain. The investigators hypothesize that 3-D tractography Vim-FUSA will improve the Vim ablation compared to standard Vim-FUSA and prove safe and feasible in the clinical setting. The investigators also hypothesize that intraoperative magnetic resonance (i-MR) monitoring will differentiate ablated tissue from immediate perilesional edema and accurately predict the Vim-FUSA clinical outcomes. Aim 1. Estimate and characterize the improvement in Vim ablation achieved with 3-D tractography Vim-FUSA vs. standard Vim-FUSA in an experimental controlled animal study. Through an experimental animal study, the investigators will characterize the Vim ablation delivered with 3-D tractography Vim-FUSA in one hemisphere (experimental group) vs. standard Vim-FUSA in the opposite hemisphere (control group). Aim 2. Test safety, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy, and estimate effect size of 3-D tractography Vim-FUSA in a phase-II, two-groups, pre-post interventional human study. In a human study, the investigators will test the safety and feasibility of ablating 70% of the Vim volume while checking for side effects with intraoperative clinical testing. Tremor assessments will be videotaped at baseline and 12 weeks and compared, in a blinded fashion, with age-sex matched controls randomly selected from the video repository of the two FDA-regulated studies of standard Vim-FUSA at baseline and 12 weeks. Aim 3 (Exploratory). Assess the accuracy of i-MR in differentiating tissue ablation from immediate perilesional edema and its utility in predicting Vim-FUSA clinical outcomes. In the experimental animal study, the investigators will estimate and compare the accuracy of conventional and non-conventional i-MR in differentiating tissue necrosis from perilesional edema. In the interventional human study, the investigators will evaluate the utility of i-MR in predicting Vim-FUSA clinical outcomes
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
3-D tractography Vim-FUSA -D tractography Vim-FUSA will be carried out as follows: (a) head shaving and placement of the stereotactic frame (Integra radionics frame, Integra Lifesciences, NJ, USA) secured to the skull with transcutaneous screws; (b) positioning on the procedure table and placement of the ultrasound transducer; (c) acquisition of conventional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and co-registration with the CT head and 3-D tractography imaging acquired pre-surgically; (d) exploration of the target area with subtherapeutic sonications; (e) intraoperative monitoring with clinical testing of tremor and side effects with a standardized protocol. (f) Therapeutic sonications in the target area to deliver definitive ablation followed by clinical testing of tremor and side effects with a standardized protocol as described in section (e).
Other names: 3-D Tractography
Time frame: during the surgical procedure
Feasibility is defined as the ability to complete the procedure without side effects.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3
The absolute change from baseline to Month 3 follow-up in upper extremity Tremor-Motor scores for the treated side is a sub-scale of Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) Part A and Part B sum used to measure treated-side upper extremity tremor changes over time. Tremor-motor scores range from 0-32 points. Individual subject's scores at Baseline and 3 Months used to calculate absolute change from baseline and averaged across subjects. High absolute change from baseline is better (shows improvement).
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3
The relative change from baseline to Month 3 follow-up in upper extremity Tremor-Motor scores for the treated side is a sub-scale of Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) Part A and Part B sum used to measure treated-side upper extremity tremor changes over time. Tremor-motor scores range from 0-32 points. Individual subject's scores at Baseline and 3 Months used to calculate relative change from baseline and averaged across subjects. High relative change from baseline is better (shows improvement).
Time frame: 3 months after the surgical procedure
Prevalence and severity of procedure-related side effects measured by the following: ataxia (SARA), speech disturbance (VHI), sensory loss (SWME), muscle weakness (MRC)
Time frame: 3 months after the surgical procedure
The Quality of Life Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST) will be used to assess tremor-related quality of life. QUEST has scores ranging from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worse disability.
Time frame: 3 months after the surgical procedure
Measured using a single question asking about patient satisfaction ranging from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction.
Time frame: Baseline, during the surgical procedure
Upper extremity tremors will be measured by video recording using i-Phone set-up.
Time frame: Baseline, during the surgical procedure
Gait will be measured by video recording using i-Phone set-up.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Vibhor Krishna, MD
CONTACT
Victoria Scott
CONTACT
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Other
3-D Tractography Focused Ultrasound Ablation for Essential Tremor
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06635811
Central Nervous System Diseases, Essential Tremor
Gainesville, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04957095
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
Dallas, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01581580
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06974916
Central Nervous System Diseases, Essential Tremor
Turku, Finland
View Trial Details