Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06974916

EMBRACE Tremor BiFUS

This is a post-market (Phase IV) randomized, controlled, blinded, multicenter study with the aim to determine the added value of staged bilateral Exablate thalamotomy compared to a group of patients on previous unilateral treatment combined with local standard medical treatment.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland

Loading trial locations.

About this study

In patients who have undergone previous unilateral Exablate thalamotomy for Essential Tremor, the aim of this trial is to determine the effect of staged bilateral Exablate thalamotomy compared to a group of patients on previous unilateral treatment. The effect will be measured on tremor reduction, functional impairment, disease-specific quality of life, adverse events and patient-perception of the overall treatment result in patients eligible for a staged bilateral Exablate procedure.

Patients assigned to the treatment arm will receive staged bilateral Exablate thalamotomy. Patients assigned to control group will remain under local standard medical treatment.

The primary efficacy study objective is to demonstrate that Exablate staged-bilateral thalamotomy treatment reduces tremor, as measured by Treated Upper Limb CRST (A+B) (0-28) score, to a higher extent than those remaining on previous unilateral Exablate thalamotomy at 6 months.

The primary safety study objective is to assess the adverse events (AEs) of Exablate staged-bilateral thalamotomy treatment in comparison to those remaining on unilateral treatment (control group) plus medical treatment, including AE type, incidence, severity and duration at 6 months.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Men and women with an age of 18 years or older (according to local labeling).
  • Willing to participate in the study (i.e., signed ICF). (Willing to be randomized).
  • Patient is able to undergo a high-resolution Computerized Tomography (CT) scan.
  • Patient is able to fit into MRI unit and comply with all contraindications for the specific magnetic resonance (MR) system including and limited to contrast medium should there be needed.
  • The thalamus, sub-thalamus and the pallidum must be apparent on MR imaging.
  • Patient is able to communicate sensations to the physician during the procedure; Procedure does not require general anesthesia.
  • Patient must be able to use the Stop Sonication button freely.
  • Patient willing to have their head shaved prior to the actual treatment.
  • Patient has no history for claustrophobia which is not responding to medications.
  • ET patients who are eligible for second side staged bilateral Exablate thalamotomy treatment (according to local labeling). Time since first intervention is at least 9 months.
  • Available tremor assessment prior to the unilateral Exablate thalamotomy.
  • Patients randomized to the study, irrespective of group allocation should be willing and able to remain in the study for at least 6 months and able to complete the required assessments.

Exclusion criteria

  • Subject experienced any non-transient neurological event or worsening following the previous Exablate procedure.
  • Patients with MRI related contraindications (e.g. presence of metallic implants incompatibility with MRI, severe claustrophobia, reaction to contrast medium).
  • Patients in whom it is not possible to avoid energy absorbing structures or sensitive tissues (e.g., skull implants, surgical clips, shunts, electrodes, dura patch, skull patch, electrodes, etc.) from the path of the ultrasound beam.
  • Patients with concurrent active infections disease and/or severe allergies with fever.
  • Patients that have been diagnosed with brain tumors or a vascular anomaly.
  • Patients with a history of seizures, brain hemorrhages, stroke within the past year, or any coagulopathy.
  • Patients under anticoagulants and/or anti-platelets drugs known to increase bleeding risk within the duration defined by the half-life of the specific drugs.
  • Patient that has been given any contrast agent (e.g., CT, MRI), within 24 hours before treatment
  • Severe unstable hypertension that cannot be controlled by medications (diastolic Blood Pressure > 100 on medication).
  • Patients with unstable cardiac status.
  • Patients exhibiting any behavior(s) consistent with ethanol or substance abuse.
  • Cerebrovascular disease (multiple CVA or CVA within 6 months).
  • Patients with risk factors for intraoperative or postoperative bleeding.
  • Imaging shows abnormal finding in CT or/and MRI (e.g., brain tumor, brain vascular malformation, shunt, etc.).
  • Patient has physical subscale score ≥ 16.5 on the Dysphagia Handicap Index or has been diagnosed with dysphagia.
  • Patient with cognitive impairment.
  • Patient with clinically significant abnormal speech function as determined by a speech pathologist.

Treatment and study plan

Staged bilateral Exablate thalamotomy

Procedure

Staged bilateral Exablate thalamotomy in ET patients

Local standard medical treatment after previous Exablate unilateral thalamotomy.

Other

Local standard medical treatment

Primary outcomes

  1. Treated Upper Limb Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) (A+B) (0-28) score for the treated side.

    Time frame: 6 Months

    The primary endpoint is the difference of the Treated Upper Limb CRST (A+B) score between groups at 6 months. Higher score means a worse tremor.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Treated Upper Limb Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) (A+B) (0-28) score as assessed by the blinded reviewers of the video-recordings.

    Time frame: 6 Months, 12 Months

    Between group comparison through month 6 and within group comparison vs baseline up to month 12 in Treated Upper Limb CRST (A+B) score as assessed by the blinded reviewers of the video-recordings. Higher score means a worse tremor.

  2. Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) part A (0-76)

    Time frame: 6 Months, 12 Months

    Between group comparison through month 6 and within group comparison vs baseline up to month 12 in resting, postural, and action tremors of all items as measured by CRST part A. Higher score means a worse tremor.

  3. Bilateral Upper Limb Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) (A+B) (0-56)

    Time frame: 6 Months, 12 Months

    Between group comparison through month 6 and within group comparison vs baseline up to month 12 in Bilateral Upper Limb CRST (A+B). Higher score means a worse tremor.

  4. Total Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) (A+B) (0-116)

    Time frame: 6 Months, 12 Months

    Between group comparison through month 6 and within group comparison vs baseline up to month 12 in Total CRST (A+B). Higher score means a worse tremor.

  5. Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) part C (0-32)

    Time frame: 6 Months, 12 Months

    Between group comparison through month 6 and within group comparison vs baseline up to month 12 in functional disabilities as measured by CRST part C. Higher score means a worse tremor.

  6. Axial Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) (0-20)

    Time frame: 6 Months, 12 Months

    Between group comparison through month 6 and within group comparison vs baseline up to month 12 in Axial CRST defined as face, tongue, head tremor and voice items of CRST part A

  7. Quality of life questionnaire

    Time frame: 6 Months, 12 Months

    Between group comparison through month 6 and within group comparison vs baseline up to month 12 in disease specific QOL

  8. Change of tremor medication

    Time frame: 6 Months, 12 Months

    Between group comparison through month 6 and within group comparison vs baseline up to month 12 in tremor medication change

  9. Safety: Incidence and frequency of adverse events related to the treatment.

    Time frame: 6 Months, 12 Months

    Incidence and frequency of adverse events related to the treatment and/or procedure. The investigator will capture any untoward events in the case report forms along with severity, duration, and resolution, and whether the event is considered serious. The severity of adverse events will be categorized according to the definition of adverse events from the International Organization for Standardization (ISO).

Other outcomes

  1. Objective assessment of specific adverse events

    Time frame: 6 Months, 12 Months

    Objective assessment of specific adverse events will be carried out for Speech, Gait and Motor Strength at baseline and 6 months and eventually at 12 months. If the adverse reported in the objective assessment is resolved at 6 months (Speech, Gait and Motor strength) it will not be carried out for the 12-month visit.

  2. Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

    Time frame: 6 Months, 12 Months

    Between group comparison through month 6 and within group comparison vs baseline up to month 12 in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC). PGIC is a 7-point scale depicting a patient's rating of overall improvement. Higher score means a worse condition.

  3. Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC)

    Time frame: 6 Months, 12 Months

    Between group comparison through month 6 and within group comparison vs baseline up to month 12 in Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC). The CGIC comprises two companion one-item measures evaluating the following: (a) severity of pathology from 1 to 7 and (b) change from the initiation of treatment on a similar seven-point scale. Higher score means a worse condition.

  4. Caregiver Global Impression of Change (CaGIC)

    Time frame: 6 Months, 12 Months

    Between group comparison through month 6 and within group comparison vs baseline up to month 12 in Caregiver Global Impression of Change (CaGIC). The CaGIC comprises two companion one-item measures evaluating the following: (a) severity of pathology from 1 to 7 and (b) change from the initiation of treatment on a similar seven-point scale. Higher score means a worse condition.

  5. Beck Depression Inventory II

    Time frame: 6 Months, 12 Months

    Between group comparison through month 6 and within group comparison vs baseline up to month 12 in Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II). The Beck Depression Inventory is a 21-question multiple-choice self-report inventory and is composed of items relating to symptoms of depression.

  6. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)

    Time frame: 6 Months, 12 Months

    Between group comparison through month 6 and within group comparison vs baseline up to month 12 in MoCA Score. The MoCA is a validated assessment that is used to detect cognitive impairment.

  7. Responder analysis

    Time frame: 6 Months

    A responder analysis will be performed to compute the proportion of subjects achieving a clinically satisfactory result. The CRST will be used. The responder analysis will be based on this scoring:

    • Full responder: no tremor (0) or barely no tremor (1).
    • Partial responder: moderate tremor, < 2cm, (2)
    • Insufficient responder: marked (2-4 cm, 3) or severe (> 4 cm)

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Insightec

CONTACT

[email protected]

Pascalle Reiters

CONTACT

[email protected]

+31 653726776

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

InSightec

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

International, Multicenter, Investigator Blinded, Randomized And Controlled Essential Tremor Trial With Staged-Bilateral FUS

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2028
First posted
May 16, 2025
Registry last updated
Jul 13, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.