Staged bilateral Exablate thalamotomy
ProcedureStaged bilateral Exablate thalamotomy in ET patients
NCT Number: NCT06974916
This is a post-market (Phase IV) randomized, controlled, blinded, multicenter study with the aim to determine the added value of staged bilateral Exablate thalamotomy compared to a group of patients on previous unilateral treatment combined with local standard medical treatment.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
In patients who have undergone previous unilateral Exablate thalamotomy for Essential Tremor, the aim of this trial is to determine the effect of staged bilateral Exablate thalamotomy compared to a group of patients on previous unilateral treatment. The effect will be measured on tremor reduction, functional impairment, disease-specific quality of life, adverse events and patient-perception of the overall treatment result in patients eligible for a staged bilateral Exablate procedure.
Patients assigned to the treatment arm will receive staged bilateral Exablate thalamotomy. Patients assigned to control group will remain under local standard medical treatment.
The primary efficacy study objective is to demonstrate that Exablate staged-bilateral thalamotomy treatment reduces tremor, as measured by Treated Upper Limb CRST (A+B) (0-28) score, to a higher extent than those remaining on previous unilateral Exablate thalamotomy at 6 months.
The primary safety study objective is to assess the adverse events (AEs) of Exablate staged-bilateral thalamotomy treatment in comparison to those remaining on unilateral treatment (control group) plus medical treatment, including AE type, incidence, severity and duration at 6 months.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Staged bilateral Exablate thalamotomy in ET patients
Local standard medical treatment
Time frame: 6 Months
The primary endpoint is the difference of the Treated Upper Limb CRST (A+B) score between groups at 6 months. Higher score means a worse tremor.
Time frame: 6 Months, 12 Months
Between group comparison through month 6 and within group comparison vs baseline up to month 12 in Treated Upper Limb CRST (A+B) score as assessed by the blinded reviewers of the video-recordings. Higher score means a worse tremor.
Time frame: 6 Months, 12 Months
Between group comparison through month 6 and within group comparison vs baseline up to month 12 in resting, postural, and action tremors of all items as measured by CRST part A. Higher score means a worse tremor.
Time frame: 6 Months, 12 Months
Between group comparison through month 6 and within group comparison vs baseline up to month 12 in Bilateral Upper Limb CRST (A+B). Higher score means a worse tremor.
Time frame: 6 Months, 12 Months
Between group comparison through month 6 and within group comparison vs baseline up to month 12 in Total CRST (A+B). Higher score means a worse tremor.
Time frame: 6 Months, 12 Months
Between group comparison through month 6 and within group comparison vs baseline up to month 12 in functional disabilities as measured by CRST part C. Higher score means a worse tremor.
Time frame: 6 Months, 12 Months
Between group comparison through month 6 and within group comparison vs baseline up to month 12 in Axial CRST defined as face, tongue, head tremor and voice items of CRST part A
Time frame: 6 Months, 12 Months
Between group comparison through month 6 and within group comparison vs baseline up to month 12 in disease specific QOL
Time frame: 6 Months, 12 Months
Between group comparison through month 6 and within group comparison vs baseline up to month 12 in tremor medication change
Time frame: 6 Months, 12 Months
Incidence and frequency of adverse events related to the treatment and/or procedure. The investigator will capture any untoward events in the case report forms along with severity, duration, and resolution, and whether the event is considered serious. The severity of adverse events will be categorized according to the definition of adverse events from the International Organization for Standardization (ISO).
Time frame: 6 Months, 12 Months
Objective assessment of specific adverse events will be carried out for Speech, Gait and Motor Strength at baseline and 6 months and eventually at 12 months. If the adverse reported in the objective assessment is resolved at 6 months (Speech, Gait and Motor strength) it will not be carried out for the 12-month visit.
Time frame: 6 Months, 12 Months
Between group comparison through month 6 and within group comparison vs baseline up to month 12 in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC). PGIC is a 7-point scale depicting a patient's rating of overall improvement. Higher score means a worse condition.
Time frame: 6 Months, 12 Months
Between group comparison through month 6 and within group comparison vs baseline up to month 12 in Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC). The CGIC comprises two companion one-item measures evaluating the following: (a) severity of pathology from 1 to 7 and (b) change from the initiation of treatment on a similar seven-point scale. Higher score means a worse condition.
Time frame: 6 Months, 12 Months
Between group comparison through month 6 and within group comparison vs baseline up to month 12 in Caregiver Global Impression of Change (CaGIC). The CaGIC comprises two companion one-item measures evaluating the following: (a) severity of pathology from 1 to 7 and (b) change from the initiation of treatment on a similar seven-point scale. Higher score means a worse condition.
Time frame: 6 Months, 12 Months
Between group comparison through month 6 and within group comparison vs baseline up to month 12 in Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II). The Beck Depression Inventory is a 21-question multiple-choice self-report inventory and is composed of items relating to symptoms of depression.
Time frame: 6 Months, 12 Months
Between group comparison through month 6 and within group comparison vs baseline up to month 12 in MoCA Score. The MoCA is a validated assessment that is used to detect cognitive impairment.
Time frame: 6 Months
A responder analysis will be performed to compute the proportion of subjects achieving a clinically satisfactory result. The CRST will be used. The responder analysis will be based on this scoring:
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
InSightec
Industry
International, Multicenter, Investigator Blinded, Randomized And Controlled Essential Tremor Trial With Staged-Bilateral FUS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06635811
Central Nervous System Diseases, Essential Tremor
Gainesville, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04957095
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
Dallas, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01581580
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03664609
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details