Shelbourne Knee Center
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States
NCT Number: NCT02460172
Study designed to compare the Zip Surgical Skin Closure device vs. conventional staples for wound closure following bi lateral knee replacement surgery.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States
Prospective, randomized, within patient control study comparing the use of Zip Surgical Skin Closure device versus conventional staple placement when utilized for surgical wound closure after bi lateral unicompartmental or bi lateral total knee replacement. A total of up to 25 patients will be enrolled and followed for up to 8 weeks post surgery to evaluate wound healing and overall satisfaction of closure method.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Non invasive, reversible, skin closure device for closure of the skin layer following surgical incisions or laceration repair.
Other names: Zip16, Zip 8i
Skin closure device for the closure of the skin layer following surgical incision
Other names: Conventional staples
Time frame: 6-8 weeks post surgery
Patient Scar Rating (0=Best to 10=Worst). A lower score means better scar rating.
Surgeon Scar Rating (0=Best to 10=Worst). A lower score means better scar rating.
Independent Plastic Surgeon Scar Rating by 8 week post op photos. (0=Best to 10=Worst). A lower score means better scar rating.
Time frame: 6-8 weeks post op
Closure method satisfaction will be collected by a 5 point satisfaction scale:
Time frame: Throughout 8 week study period (Discharge, 2 wk follow up and 8 wk exit visit)
Pain levels will be collected using a 10 point VAS scale.
Time frame: 6 to 8 wk follow up visit
Scar Satisfaction (both Zip and Staple sides) will be collected using a 5 point scale:
Very Satisfied Satisfied Neither Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied
Time frame: 2 weeks and 6-8 weeks
Knee Range of Motion for each knee will be measured in degrees
ZipLine Medical Inc.
Industry
A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Post-market Study to Compare the Use of the Zip® Surgical Skin Closure Device Versus Conventional Staples for Skin Closure in Subjects Having Undergone Bilateral Knee Arthroplasty
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06407778
Arthritis, Arthroplasty, Knee Replacement
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT01226186
Agnosia, Arthroplasty, Knee Replacement
Bournemouth, Dorset., United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT07736287
Bone Regeneration, Wound Healing
Bangalore, Karnataka, India
View Trial DetailsNCT06634030
Surgical Wound, Wound Healing
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
View Trial Details