Zambia Healthy Choices Project for Emerging Adults Living With HIV

SUS is a 10-item, 5-point Likert scale for subjective assessment of usability. Each item ranges from 1 to 5. Depending on the item, the score is calculated by subtracting either one from the user response or the user response from 5. Then, the score for each item will be summed and multiplied by 2.5 for the total score. The overall SUS scores range from 0 to 100. A score of > 50 indicates that the technology-based interventions are acceptable.

SUS is a 10-item, 5-point Likert scale for subjective assessment of usability. Each item ranges from 1 to 5. Depending on the item, the score is calculated by subtracting either one from the user response or the user response from 5. Then, the score for each item will be summed and multiplied by 2.5 for the total score. The overall SUS scores range from 0 to 100. A score of > 50 indicates that the technology-based interventions are acceptable.

CSQ-8 is an 8-item, 4-point Likert scale measuring the construct of global intervention satisfaction. The total possible composite score ranges from 8 to 32, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability.

CSQ-8 is an 8-item, 4-point Likert scale measuring the construct of global intervention satisfaction. The total possible composite score ranges from 8 to 32, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability.

Participants will be invited to share their experiences with mHC and MTM, including feedback on acceptability, ease of use, suggestions for improvement, and impact on ART adherence and alcohol use reduction.

Intervention feasibility will be assessed based on participant retention at Month 6. The retention rate can range from 70 to 90%, with a retention rate of over 85% deemed the minimum criterion for feasibility.

Intervention feasibility will be evaluated by the total number of responses to MTM.

Intervention feasibility will be evaluated by the number of completed intervention sessions.

ART adherence will be assessed through the Young Adult Adherence Interview via computer-assisted self-interview (CASI) survey, which contains a visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 100. Higher percentages on the VAS indicate greater adherence to ART.

ART adherence will be evaluated through self-reported adherence over the past four weeks via a CASI survey. Participants will rate their adherence on a scale ranging from 0 to 100%, with higher percentages indicating better adherence to ART.

ART adherence will be evaluated by examining the HIV viral load in DBS. Maintaining a viral load of less than 200 copies/ml will indicate adherence to ART.

Alcohol use will be assessed using the TLFB interview. Using a calendar, participants will be asked to provide estimates of their daily drinking over the last 30 days, as well as the max number of drinks in a one-week period, the number of heavy drinking days, the number of standard drinks in 30 days, and binge drinking.

HIV transmission risk awareness will be evaluated through an 18-item HIV Knowledge Questionnaire. Total possible composite scores range from 0 to 18, with higher scores indicating a higher level of HIV knowledge.

ART knowledge will be evaluated through a 21-item HIV Treatment Knowledge Questionnaire. Total possible composite scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating a higher level of ART knowledge.

Intentions to improve HIV self-management and alcohol consumption behaviors will be evaluated using the 5-item Rollnick's Readiness Ruler. Each item ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating a greater readiness for change.

Attitudes toward risk behaviors will be assessed using the 32-item Decisional Balance for Problem Behavior scale. This 5-point Likert scale evaluates the perceived pros and cons of engaging in risk behaviors

Behavioral skills in HIV self-management will be assessed using a 5-item adapted version of the Self-Efficacy for Health Promotion and Risk Reduction Questionnaire. This 5-point Likert scale measures confidence levels (score range: 5-25), with higher scores indicating greater confidence in HIV self-management tasks.

Syphilis testing will employ a treponemal test with rapid plasma reagin (RPR), while gonorrhea and chlamydia testing will utilize pooled urine, oropharyngeal, and rectal swabs.

Sexual risk will be assessed using TLFB interview via CASI, capturing sexual behavior over the past 30 days, such as condom usage and the number of sexual partners.

Drug use will be assessed with ASSIST, which is a questionnaire to identify substance use health risks and disorders, with each item scored from 0 to 12. The total score ranges up to 24, with higher scores indicating greater risk based on current substance use patterns.

Alcohol use will be assessed by using AUDIT-C to identify individuals with hazardous drinking habits or alcohol use disorders. Each item scores from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating no alcohol consumption. The total score maxes out at 12, with higher scores suggesting greater risks of harm.

Mental health will be evaluated with BSI-18. This 18-item questionnaire utilizes a 5-point Likert scale to gauge psychological distress. Scores range up to 72, with higher scores indicating a higher level of psychological distress.

Social support will be evaluated using the Social Provision Scale. This 5-point Likert scale, 13-item survey assesses the availability of social support, such as emotional, information, and instrumental support, as well as companionship and social isolation. Scores range up to 65, with higher scores indicating more extensive availability of social support.

HIV-related stigma will be evaluated using the 10-item Berger's Stigma Scale. This scale, based on a 4-point Likert scale, assesses the stigma perceived by people living with HIV. The score can range from 10 to 40, with a higher score indicating greater perceived stigma associated with HIV.