Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05817760

Z-plasty and Heineke-Mikulicz Scrotoplasty in the Management of Penoscrotal Web

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the surgical outcome of Z-scrotoplasty versus Heineke-Mikulicz scrotoplasty in the management of congenital penoscrotal web in pediatric age group.

The main question[s] it aims to answer are:

• Question 1: Is there a difference in the surgical outcome between using Z-scrotoplasty and Heinke Miculickz scrotoplasty in the management of congenital penoscrotal web?] Participants will be divided into two groups; Group A treated by Z-scrotoplasty and Group B treated by Heineke Miculickz scrotoplasty.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Sex eligibility

Male

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Faculty of Medicine

Alexandria, 12345, Egypt

About this study

Background: The penoscrotal web may be congenital or acquired after excessive removal of ventral skin during circumcision. There are several previously described surgical techniques for the treatment of congenital webbed penis without a clear comparison between their outcomes. Purpose: the objective of our study was to compare the surgical results of Z-scrotoplasty and Heineke-Mikulicz scrotoplasty in the treatment of congenital webbed penis. Patients & Methods: Our prospective study included 40 uncircumcised patients presented with a webbed penis. They were divided into group A which was treated by Z-scrotoplasty and group B which was treated by Heineke-Mikulicz scrotoplasty.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with congenital penoscrotal web in the pediatric age group

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with any penile anomalies

Treatment and study plan

Z-scrotoplasty

Procedure

Z shape incision of the penoscrotal web and closure

Heineke-Mikulicz scrotoplasty

Procedure

Transverse incision of the penoscrotal web with vertical closure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of patients who developed post-operative penile edema, hematoma, adequate skin coverage and wound contracture with recurrent webbing will be assessed

    Time frame: One post-operative year

    Post-operative follow up for the detection of penile edema, hematoma, skin coverage and the development of any wound contracture and consequently recurrent webbing

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Egyptian Biomedical Research Network

Network

Registry information

Official study title

Evaluation of Z-plasty Versus Heineke-Mikulicz Scrotoplasty in the Management of Penoscrotal Web in Pediatric Age Group

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Apr 18, 2023
Registry last updated
Apr 18, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.