Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03352908

Yale Swallow Protocol in Extubated Patients

The purpose of this study is to determine if the Yale Swallow Protocol is an effective screen for aspiration in recently extubated patients.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

University of Wisconsin - Madison

Madison, Wisconsin, 53792, United States

About this study

Dysphagia is prevalent in recently extubated patients with estimates ranging from 29-84% of recently extubated patients having some form of dysphagia with elevated risk for silent aspiration.One challenge providers face when managing post extubation dysphagia (PED) is that there are no best practice guidelines on how to evaluate for PED, specifically how to evaluate for silent aspiration (aspiration without cough response).

One method that has been suggested is the Yale Swallow Protocol (YSP), a pass/fail screen for aspiration consisting of a three ounce water challenge as well as a brief cognitive screen and oral motor exam. The assumption of the YSP is that silent aspiration (aspiration without a cough response) is volume dependent. This is based on a study of over 4000 patients that underwent both a FEES (5mL puree and 5mL liquid boluses) and a 3oz water challenge. Results from previous literature indicated that the 3oz water swallow had a high sensitivity for detecting aspiration (98%). This was again studied with a double blind research design with 25 patients, comparing results of the 3oz water challenge with results of videofluoroscopic swallow study. This showed 100% sensitivity for detecting aspiration, 64% specificity, 78% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value. However, no published study has evaluated the YSP in recently extubated patients and so it is unclear if the high sensitivity and specificity would be retained. Investigators aim to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the Yale Swallow Protocol in identifying aspiration in recently extubated patients.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Intubation greater than 24 hours
  • Age 18 and older
  • All races
  • Males and females
  • English speaking
  • Swallow consult ordered by the team within 48 hours of extubation

Exclusion criteria

  • Known history of oropharyngeal dysphagia
  • Contraindication for FEES due to facial fractures, nothing by mouth (NPO) status for other procedures, elevated bleeding risk, reduced level of alertness, or significant agitation.
  • Allergy to dairy

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Determine the sensitivity of the Yale Swallow Protocol (YSP) through aspiration identification in recently extubated patients.

    Time frame: Assessing the sensitivity of YSP within 2 study visit, within 2 hours. Data will be reported at study completion, an average of 1 year.

    Participants will receive FEES and YSP in a randomized order within a 2 hours of one another. Sensitivity estimates and analysis will be obtained through confidence intervals

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Wisconsin, Madison

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Yale Swallow Protocol in Recently Extubated Patients

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Nov 24, 2017
Registry last updated
Sep 14, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.