Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06363591

WoW - Single- vs Two-staged Excisions of Thin Melanoma

The overall aim of this national, multicenter, prospective, randomized, and controlled study is to enhance the management of patients with thin melanoma (≤1 mm Breslow thickness). The investigators hypothesize that wide local excisions (WLEs) following complete excision of thin melanoma do not affect the risk of recurrence, defined as the occurrence of local, regional, distant disease, or melanoma-specific death during a 5- to 10-year follow-up period.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Sahlgrenska University Hospital

Gothenburg, 41345, Sweden

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

John Paoli, Professor

CONTACT

[email protected]

+46730404044

John Paoli, Professor

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

About this study

Melanoma is one of the most common forms of skin cancer and has become the third most common type of cancer among men and the fourth most common among women in Sweden.

The mortality associated with melanoma is strongly linked to the thickness of the original tumor. Thicker tumors generally have a worse prognosis compared to thinner tumors. In melanoma in situ (MIS), the tumor is confined to the epidermis and cannot spread. In invasive melanoma, the tumor has grown into the dermis. The thickness of these invasive melanomas is measured using the "Breslow thickness." Thinner invasive melanomas with a Breslow thickness of ≤1.0 mm constitute the majority of cases in Sweden and have an excellent prognosis with a 10-year disease-specific survival rate of 97%.

Melanoma represents a significant economic burden with increasing healthcare costs. Early detection and cost-effective treatment strategies are therefore important to improve prognosis, reduce costs, and avoid unnecessary overtreatment.

Surgical methods for treating melanoma vary depending on the thickness of the tumor. Traditionally, a two-step procedure has been used. Initially, a diagnostic excision (surgery to remove the tumor) with a narrow clinical margin is performed. Once melanoma is confirmed, a second wide local excision (WLE) is performed around the surgical scar with a 1-2 cm clinical margin depending on the exact Breslow thickness. This method has evolved over time, and narrower clinical margins are now used in the WLE than previously. However, researchers have begun to question whether a WLE is necessary at all for thin melanomas if the tumor is completely removed during the initial diagnostic excision.

Researchers are now exploring a more personalized treatment strategy that considers histopathological margins instead of a standardized clinical margin. For well-defined melanomas, a clinical margin of 3-5 mm may be sufficient to ensure that the melanoma is removed with an acceptable histopathological margin (≥1.5 mm). The hypothesis is that this margin may be adequate and that the WLE does not reduce the risk of local, regional or distant disease nor melanoma-specific death. If the hypothesis is proven, unnecessary surgery, patient suffering, risk of complications, resource utilization, and healthcare costs could be reduced.

The investigators now want to investigate whether there is a difference in the risk of recurrence, spread, and/or death for patients with thin melanomas (≤1mm Breslow thickness) treated with only one excision compared to the current standard of two excisions.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Patients need to fulfill all criteria listed below:

  • Has recently been diagnosed with a primary invasive cutaneous melanoma of Breslow thickness ≤1.0 mm (pT1) as determined by a diagnostic excision with subsequent histopathological analysis that:
  • Is located on a body location in which a WLE with a 10-mm clinical margin is feasible and would have been planned according to current standard of care.
  • Had histopathologically verified free margins of at least 1.5 mm.
  • Is 18 years or older at time of consent.
  • Is able to give informed consent and comply with the treatment protocol and follow-up plan.
  • Has a life expectancy of ≥5 years from the time of diagnosis.

Exclusion criteria

If any of the listed criteria below are present, the patient is ineligible for study participation.

The study lesion:

  • was partially biopsied prior to the diagnostic excision.
  • was diagnostically excised with a clinical margin >5 mm.
  • was a melanoma of desmoplastic or lentiginous (i.e. lentigo maligna or acral lentiginous) subtype.
  • was located on digits in which amputation is necessary.

The patient:

  • had a previous or concurrent MIS or invasive melanoma (cutaneous or non-cutaneous).
  • had physical, clinical, radiographic or pathologic evidence of microsatellite, satellite, in-transit, regional or distant metastatic melanoma.
  • had a previous or intercurrent treated solid tumor or hematologic malignancy during the past 5 years except cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma or basal cell carcinoma.
  • has planned adjuvant radiotherapy to the primary melanoma site after WLE.

Treatment and study plan

Surgery

Procedure

Wise or wide excision

No Surgery

Other

No wide local excision

Primary outcomes

  1. Recurrence rate at 5 years.

    Time frame: 5 years

    Recurrence is defined as any presence of local/regional/distant disease or melanoma-specific death.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Recurrence rate at 10 years.

    Time frame: 10 years

    Recurrence is defined as any presence of local/regional/distant disease or melanoma-specific death.

Other outcomes

  1. Postoperative complications

    Time frame: 3 months

    Determine the frequency of postoperative complications in both treatment groups.

  2. Scar length, width and quality

    Time frame: 1 year

    Measurement of the scar length and width as well as the scar quality assessed by both patient and clinician (measured with the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale, POSAS). The POSAS consists of two subscales: the Patient Scale and the Observer Scale, each ranging from 6 to 60, where a lower score indicates a better scar outcome.

  3. Scar length, width and quality

    Time frame: 3 years

    Measurement of the scar length and width as well as the scar quality assessed by both patient and clinician (measured with the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale, POSAS). The POSAS consists of two subscales: the Patient Scale and the Observer Scale, each ranging from 6 to 60, where a lower score indicates a better scar outcome.

  4. Patient satisfaction

    Time frame: 3 months

    The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Treatment Satisfaction - Patient Satisfaction questionnaire (FACIT-TS-PS) is to be completed electronically or in clinic. The FACIT-TS-PS assesses patient satisfaction with treatment, with total scores ranging from 0 to 36, where higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with treatment.

  5. Patient satisfaction

    Time frame: 1 year

    The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Treatment Satisfaction - Patient Satisfaction questionnaire (FACIT-TS-PS) is to be completed electronically or in clinic. The FACIT-TS-PS assesses patient satisfaction with treatment, with total scores ranging from 0 to 36, where higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with treatment.

  6. Patient satisfaction

    Time frame: 2 years

    The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Treatment Satisfaction - Patient Satisfaction questionnaire (FACIT-TS-PS) is to be completed electronically or in clinic. The FACIT-TS-PS assesses patient satisfaction with treatment, with total scores ranging from 0 to 36, where higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with treatment.

  7. Patients' quality of life

    Time frame: 3 months

    The Quality of Life (QoL) questionnaire Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Melanoma (FACT-M) is to be completed electronically or in clinic. The FACT-M assesses quality of life in melanoma patients, with total scores ranging from 0 to 172, where higher scores indicate better quality of life.

  8. Patients' quality of life

    Time frame: 1 year

    The Quality of Life (QoL) questionnaire Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Melanoma (FACT-M) is to be completed electronically or in clinic. The FACT-M assesses quality of life in melanoma patients, with total scores ranging from 0 to 172, where higher scores indicate better quality of life.

  9. Patients' quality of life

    Time frame: 2 years

    The Quality of Life (QoL) questionnaire Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Melanoma (FACT-M) is to be completed electronically or in clinic. The FACT-M assesses quality of life in melanoma patients, with total scores ranging from 0 to 172, where higher scores indicate better quality of life.

  10. All-cause mortality

    Time frame: 5 years

    Overall all-cause mortality incidence in both treatment groups.

  11. All-cause mortality

    Time frame: 10 years

    Overall all-cause mortality incidence in both treatment groups.

  12. Direct and indirect costs per patient

    Time frame: 5 years

    Calculate and compare costs per patient in the experimental and control groups.

  13. Biomarkers

    Time frame: 10 years

    Differences in biomarkers of recurrent and non-recurrent melanomas.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

John Paoli, Professor

CONTACT

[email protected]

0730404044

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Vastra Gotaland Region

Other Gov

Collaborators

  • Blekinge County Council Hospital
  • Dalarna County Council, Sweden
  • Region Skane
  • Region Stockholm
  • Region Västerbotten
  • Region Örebro County
  • Region Östergötland

Registry information

Official study title

Wise vs Wide: A National, Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized and Controlled, Parallel Group, Non-inferiority Study to Compare Single- vs Two-staged Excisions of Thin Melanoma

Acronym: WoW

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2034
Study completion
2039
First posted
Apr 12, 2024
Registry last updated
Mar 5, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.