Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07261488

Wound Assessment Accuracy and Treatment Efficiency

Wound assessment is critical for developing effective treatment strategies, yet there is a scarcity of research on the assessment accuracy of clinical practitioners. An online questionnaire-based survey was conducted from March to April 2025. It involved 118 wound specialists from 9 specialized wound care institutions in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region of China, who evaluated 8 standardized wound cases. A total of 553 valid responses were collected.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Wound - in Medical Care

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Peking University Third Hospital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100191, China

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • being a wound therapist, specialized nurse, or physician in relevant departments;
  • having completed systematic specialized wound training (provided by, but not limited to, EWMA, ICW, ET, the Chinese Nursing Association, the Wound Baihui online education platform, or other medical institutions)

Exclusion criteria

  • Not applicable

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. The weighted overall accuracy of wound assessments

    Time frame: Baseline

    Compare the assessment answers given by wound specialist to determine the accuracy rate of the assessment of the wound practitioners surveyed

Secondary outcomes

  1. The average accuracy for observational assessment items (e.g., wound size, types of wound bed tissue, wound exudate)

    Time frame: Baseline

    An assessment response was scored as correct if it was consistent with the standard answer. Calculate the accuracy for observational assessment items (e.g., wound size, types of wound bed tissue, wound exudate) .

  2. The average the accuracy of inferential assessment items (e.g., etiologic classification of wounds, healing capacity, wound characteristic analysis)

    Time frame: Baseline

    An assessment response was scored as correct if it was consistent with the standard answer. Calculated the average accuracy of inferential assessment items (e.g., etiologic classification of wounds, healing capacity, wound characteristic analysis)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Peking University Third Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The Impact of Inaccurate Wound Assessment on Treatment Efficiency: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Survey in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region of China

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Dec 3, 2025
Registry last updated
Dec 3, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.