Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02907944

Working With HIV Clinics to Adopt Addiction Treatments Using Implementation Facilitation

Tobacco, alcohol and opioid use disorders threaten the health of HIV-infected patients. What if evidence-based counseling and medication treatments for tobacco, alcohol and opioid use disorders (herein refered to as addiction treatments) were routinely provided in HIV clinics? Implementation Facilitation is an established strategy to increase the uptake of evidence-based treatments. Our goal is to evaluate the impact of Implementation Facilitation on the use of addiction treatments in four large HIV clinics.

The purpose of the WHAT-IF study is:

Aim 1. Among key stakeholders, to use quantitative and qualitative (mixed) methods to identify the site-specific evidence, context and facilitation-related barriers and facilitators to the integration of addiction treatments to help tailor an Implementation Facilitation for each clinic.

Aim 2. To evaluate the impact of Implementation Facilitation on:

2a: Organizational readiness to deliver addiction treatments 2b: Provider readiness to deliver addiction treatments 2c: Provision of addiction treatments 2d: Changes in organizational models of care used to deliver addiction treatments

Aim 3. To evaluate the impact of Implementation Facilitation on antiretroviral therapy receipt, HIV viral suppression, VACS Index, and retention in HIV care among patients eligible for addiction treatment.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Hartford Hospital's HIV Clinic, Hartford, Connecticut, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The Working with HIV clinics to adopt Addiction Treatments using Implementation Facilitation (WHAT IF?) study will evaluate the impact of Implementation Facilitation on the adoption of addiction treatment services in four HIV clinics. We will use a stepped wedge design . The primary comparison is of the change that occurs from the pre-implementation period to two post-implementation periods, the initial six months (evaluation) and the following six months (maintenance). This proposal will consist of three main components in each of four clinics: 1) formative evaluation with key stakeholders at each site to guide and refine the Implementation Facilitation, 2) conduct of the Implementation Facilitation and 3) an evaluation of the impact of the Implementation Facilitation on organization and provider-level readiness, provision of addiction treatments, and HIV outcomes.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Patient inclusion criteria:

  • HIV-infected
  • Receiving HIV care in the index clinic
  • Age >18 years old
  • Meets criteria for lifetime or current tobacco, alcohol and/or opioid use disorder regardless of addiction treatment status
  • Able to provide verbal informed consent

Staff inclusion criteria:

  • Employed at participating HIV clinic for at least 6 months
  • Able to provide verbal informed consent.

Payer/health insurance provider inclusion criteria:

  • Employed at an organization or agency that provides funding for medical services for HIV-infected individuals for at least 6 months.
  • Able to provide verbal informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Unable to provide verbal informed consent

Treatment and study plan

Implementation Facilitation

Behavioral

Implementation Facilitation is an evidence-based strategy tailored to the specific needs of the clinic, designed to increase uptake of evidence based treatments for tobacco, alcohol and opioid use disorders. Will include provider education and academic detailing.

  • External Facilitator: Outside content expert who assists site
  • Local Champion: Site stakeholder who promotes change
  • Provider Education and Academic Detailing: Provision of unbiased peer education
  • Stakeholder Engagement: Aligning goals of implementation and those impacted
  • Tailor Program to Site: Addressing site specific needs based on Aim 1
  • Performance Monitoring and Feedback: Assess implementation of screening and treatment efforts and inform site of results
  • Formative Evaluation: Quant. and qual. determination of impact
  • Establish a Learning Collaborative: Shared learning opportunities tailored to stakeholders
  • Program Marketing: Increase attention to availability of on-site addiction treatment services

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Provision of Addiction Treatments

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

    Study team will use the electronic health record (EHR) to identify prescriptions for each of the target medications in the surveillance period. Study team will use CPT codes to determine whether specific counseling therapies were provided. Patients diagnosed with Opioid Use Disorder and/or Alcohol Use Disorder and/or Tobacco Use Disorder were identified and then assessed in the EHR to determine if medication assisted therapy was provided by a provider during the 6 month Intervention period.

  2. Change in Provision of Addiction Treatments

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 months

    Study team will use the electronic medical record to identify prescriptions for each of the target medications in the surveillance period. Study team will use CPT codes to determine whether specific counseling therapies were provided. Patients diagnosed with Opioid Use Disorder and/or Alcohol Use Disorder and/or Tobacco Use Disorder were identified and then assessed in the EHR to determine if medication assisted therapy was provided by a provider during the 12 month Evaluation period.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) Receipt

    Time frame: 6 months

    ART receipt will be defined as at least 180 days of three concurrent antiretroviral agents in the 6-month interval based on prescriptions in the electronic medical record.

  2. Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) Receipt

    Time frame: 12 months

    ART receipt will be defined as at least 180 days of three concurrent antiretroviral agents in the 6-month interval based on prescriptions in the electronic medical record.

  3. Viral Suppression

    Time frame: 6 months

    Viral suppression, will be defined as HIV RNA <200 copies/mL at last test closest to the time of data extraction, consistent with Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) guidelines. Although current limits of detection are lower, this cutoff allows for low-level "blips" that have no clinical significance.

  4. Viral Suppression

    Time frame: 12 months

    Viral suppression, will be defined as HIV RNA <200 copies/mL at last test closest to the time of data extraction, consistent with Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) guidelines. Although current limits of detection are lower, this cutoff allows for low-level "blips" that have no clinical significance.

  5. VACS Index

    Time frame: 6 months

    The Veterans Aging Cohort Study Index (VACS Index) creates a score by summing pre-assigned points for age, routinely monitored indicators of HIV disease (CD4 count and HIV-1 RNA), and general indicators of organ system injury including hemoglobin, platelets, aspartate and alanine transaminase (AST and ALT), creatinine, and viral hepatitis C infection (HCV). This score is weighted to indicate increasing risk of all-cause mortality with increasing score. The score can be used to estimate risk of all-cause mortality using a conversion factor. The VACS Index will be evaluated based on most recent values at the time of data extraction. VACS Index score will be treated as a continuous variable. VACS Index: minimum value: 0; maximum value: 164- a higher score means a worse outcome.

  6. VACS Index

    Time frame: 12 months

    The Veterans Aging Cohort Study Index (VACS Index) creates a score by summing pre-assigned points for age, routinely monitored indicators of HIV disease (CD4 count and HIV-1 RNA), and general indicators of organ system injury including hemoglobin, platelets, aspartate and alanine transaminase (AST and ALT), creatinine, and viral hepatitis C infection (HCV). This score is weighted to indicate increasing risk of all-cause mortality with increasing score. The score can be used to estimate risk of all-cause mortality using a conversion factor. The VACS Index will be evaluated based on most recent values at the time of data extraction. VACS Index score will be treated as a continuous variable. VACS Index: minimum value: 0; maximum value: 164- a higher score means a worse outcome.

  7. Retention in HIV Care

    Time frame: 6 months

    Retention in HIV care, per DHHS guidelines uses a 24-month measurement period. It is defined as at least one HIV medical care visit in each 6-month period, with a minimum of 60 days between the first medical visit in the prior 6-month period and the last medical visit in the subsequent 6-month period. This measure has good agreement with the Institute of Medicine indicator for retention in care and is an independent predictor of mortality. We will evaluate whether patients have had at least 1 visit in the 6-month period prior to time of data extraction.

  8. Retention in HIV Care

    Time frame: 12 months

    Retention in HIV care, per DHHS guidelines uses a 24-month measurement period. It is defined as at least one HIV medical care visit in each 6-month period, with a minimum of 60 days between the first medical visit in the prior 6-month period and the last medical visit in the subsequent 6-month period. This measure has good agreement with the Institute of Medicine indicator for retention in care and is an independent predictor of mortality. We will evaluate whether patients have had at least 1 visit in the 6-month period prior to time of data extraction.

  9. Organizational Readiness

    Time frame: 6 months

    Investigators will use the ORCA to measure factors impacting the provision of addiction treatments. This 15-minute survey is based on the PARiHS framework and asks the respondent to rate local factors related to evidence, context and facilitation on a 5-point Likert scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Facilitation questions will be omitted from the pre-implementation assessment since this part of the intervention and will not have taken place. The score has a range from 1 to 5 where a higher score indicates higher readiness.

  10. Organizational Readiness

    Time frame: 12 months

    Investigators will use the ORCA to measure factors impacting the provision of addiction treatments. This 15-minute survey is based on the PARiHS framework and asks the respondent to rate local factors related to evidence, context and facilitation on a 5-point Likert scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Facilitation questions will be omitted from the pre-implementation assessment since this part of the intervention and will not have taken place. The score has a range from 1 to 5 where a higher score indicates higher readiness.

  11. Provider Readiness

    Time frame: 6 months

    Investigators will use change rulers, among appropriate providers, for each of the medications and counseling to assess readiness to provide each medication and counseling intervention. The change rulers will independently assess, on a 0-10 scale each provider's: 1) confidence to prescribe/provide the intervention, 2) readiness to prescribe/provide the intervention and 3) commitment to prescribe/provide the intervention. Presented is the score that indicates readiness to prescribe medication. The score has a range from 1 to 10 where a higher score indicates increased readiness.

  12. Provider Readiness:

    Time frame: 12 months

    Investigators will use change rulers, among appropriate providers, for each of the medications and counseling to assess readiness to provide each medication and counseling intervention.185 The change rulers will independently assess, on a 0-10 scale each provider's: 1) confidence to prescribe/provide the intervention, 2) readiness to prescribe/provide the intervention and 3) commitment to prescribe/provide the intervention. Presented is the score that indicates readiness to prescribe medication. The score has a range from 1 to 10 where a higher score indicates increased readiness.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Yale University

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)

Registry information

Official study title

Working With HIV Clinics to Adopt Addiction Treatments Using Implementation Facilitation (WHAT-IF?)

Acronym: WHAT-IF?

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Sep 20, 2016
Registry last updated
May 8, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.