Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06728566

Work at Heights Training: Conventional Approach With and Without Immersive Virtual Reality

This study focuses on the design and evaluation of an innovative training protocol aimed at working at heights in the construction sector in the city of Cali. The main focus of this protocol lies in the use of Immersive Virtual Reality (IVR) and the measurement of biosignals to enhance workers' safety and preparedness. The training protocol is developed by creating virtual environments that simulate hazardous working conditions, allowing workers to practice high-risk situations safely and effectively. Additionally, the integration of biosignal measurements, such as heart rate variability and respiratory rate, is used to assess workers' stress levels and decision-making abilities during simulations.

The protocol evaluation is conducted through a pilot study with real workers in the construction field. The results are analyzed to determine whether the use of IVR and biosignal measurement improves assertiveness and, therefore, safety, reduces workplace accidents, and increases workers' confidence in high-risk environments. The findings of this study will provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of IVR and biosignal measurement as training tools in the construction sector, which could have a significant impact on reducing workplace accidents and injuries. This innovative approach has the potential to enhance occupational safety and workers' preparedness in high-risk environments, thereby contributing to a safer and more efficient working environment in the construction industry.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Universidad Autonoma de Occidente

Cali, Colombia

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Diana Guerrero

CONTACT

[email protected]

573172603503

About this study

Safety in the construction sector is of vital importance, especially in high-risk activities such as excavations and working at heights. To improve worker training and preparation in these areas, this research proposal has been developed.

This project focuses on the use of advanced technology, such as Immersive Virtual Reality, to simulate real work situations and allow workers to practice and acquire the necessary skills to face the challenges of their daily tasks. However, what makes this project particularly interesting is the incorporation of biosignal measurement during training.

Biosignals are physiological indicators that can be measured and analyzed to assess an individual's emotional and physical state. In this context, devices will be used to capture data such as heart rate, respiratory rate, and their variability. These measurements will provide precise information about the worker's reactions to different simulated situations, which will, in turn, help identify areas for improvement and optimize the training protocol.

The main contribution of this project lies in generating new knowledge about how biosignals can be used as a complementary tool in the design and evaluation of training protocols for workers in high-risk activities. The information obtained through biosignal measurement will allow for the identification of patterns and trends that will help better understand workers' physiological and emotional reactions, as well as their performance in critical situations.

This clinical trial compares two training methods for workers at heights, one using Immersive Virtual Reality (IVR) in addition to the conventional training, and the other using only the conventional training. The main questions to be answered are:

What is the impact of the IVR training protocol on the acquisition of knowledge and practical skills of workers in high-risk activities compared to traditional training?

Is there a relationship between immersive Virtual Reality training and the physiological response to stressful situations in high-risk activities, through the recording of biosignals taken during the intervention?

The researchers will compare the two forms of training and identify if there are differences in both fitness and cardiorespiratory response.

Participants in the control group will perform practical work at heights while heart rate, respiratory monitoring, and ergonomic analysis of the activity will be performed. The participants of the intervention group, in addition to the above, will be exposed to virtual reality environments as part of the training of work at heights, this will be before the actual practical part.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Learners from the National Learning Service (SENA).
  • First time taking the work at heights training course.

Exclusion criteria

  • Experience in working at heights.
  • Health conditions that prevent performing both the IVR training and work at heights.

Treatment and study plan

Inmersive virtual reality

Device

In addition to conventional training, IVR training aims to provide a detailed preview of the tasks and procedures required in the standard training with selected virtual scenarios:

Scenario 1: Inspection and Use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE):

In this scenario, the worker will inspect the equipment to ensure it is in good condition and properly used: Harness, Helmet, Lanyards, Carabiners, Lifelines, Energy Absorbers

Scenario 2: Working on an Elevated Metal Structure:

Structure Ascent: Ascent Method: Use specific ascent systems, ensuring you are always connected to an anchor point.

Positioning on the Structure: Secure Anchorage: Once the working position is reached, secure the anchor to a fixed and reliable point.

Structure Descent: Unanchoring and Reanchoring: Unanchor and re-anchor at secure points as you descend.

Additional Safety Measures: Weather Conditions, signage and delimitation:

Scenario 3: Rescue at Heights: Accessing the Person in Danger, rescue Techniques.

Conventional training

Other

The working at heights training provided by the National Learning Service (SENA) in Colombia includes key steps to ensure safety and proper equipment use:

  • Harness Use: Inspect for damage, wear it like a vest, and ensure correct orientation. Adjust shoulder and leg straps for comfort and secure the chest strap.
  • Final Check: Verify D-rings are correctly positioned, and all buckles are securely fastened.
  • Helmet: Inspect for damage and adjust for a secure fit.
  • Lanyards: Select in good condition, connect properly, keep tension, and avoid overloading.
  • Carabiners: Use certified carabiners with functioning locks, connected to proper points.
  • Lifelines and Energy Absorbers: Install and tension lifelines properly; check energy absorbers before use.
  • Climbing/Descending: Maintain three contact points and secure tools to avoid accidents.

Primary outcomes

  1. PRACTICAL SKILLS FOR WORKING AT HEIGHTS

    Time frame: The time frame for completing all practical activities, assessments, and evaluations is approximately 10 hours, distributed over 2 days.

    Each activity is scored on an approve/disapprove system. By the end, workers must meet these standards:

    • Harness Donning and Adjustment: Properly don, adjust straps, and ensure no slack. Passing requires a secure, comfortable fit and correct anchor positioning.
    • Anchor Points: Select/install anchors compatible with the system and load standards. Passing requires secure installation verified by testing.
    • Lifelines: Use vertical/horizontal lifelines, maintaining connection. Passing requires constant security.
    • Climbing/Moving: Safely ascend/descend while connected. Passing requires proper system use and controlled movements.
    • Tool Handling: Secure tools to prevent falls. Passing requires consistent adherence to safety protocols.
    • Emergency Response: Simulate emergencies calmly, following protocols. Passing requires appropriate stress management.
    • Equipment Inspection: Identify equipment issues. Passing requires thorough inspection and defect reporting.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Heart Rate Variability

    Time frame: Heart rate variability will be assessed over an approximate period of 45 minutes.

    Variation in the time between RR intervals on the electrocardiogram

  2. Respiratory Rate Variability

    Time frame: Respiratory rate variability will be assessed over an approximate period of 45 minutes.

    The fluctuation in time between consecutive breathing cycles.

  3. Ergonomic Analysis of the Activity

    Time frame: The REBA score will be assessed over an approximate period of 25 minutes during the observation of the occupational task.

    The REBA (Rapid Entire Body Assessment) score quantifies the ergonomic risk of musculoskeletal injury in occupational tasks by evaluating body postures, forces, and repetitive movements. It assigns values to the position of the head, torso, arms, legs, and wrists, physical effort (e.g., lifting, pushing, pulling), and task repetition. The total score ranges from 1 to 15, with scores from 1-3 indicating minimal risk, 4-7 indicating moderate risk, and 8-15 suggesting high risk. A higher REBA score indicates greater potential for musculoskeletal disorders. The REBA score helps identify ergonomic risks and prioritize interventions to reduce injury risk.

  4. Attention and memory measurements

    Time frame: Before the training protocol

    The Neuropsi (Neuropsychological Screening Battery) score assesses cognitive function in multiple domains, including attention, memory, executive function, and language. It consists of tasks measuring short-term memory, attention span, visuospatial abilities, and verbal fluency, among others. The total score is calculated by summing the results from each subtest, with a range from 0 to 30 points for each domain. Higher scores indicate better cognitive performance, while lower scores suggest cognitive impairment. The Neuropsi score is used to monitor cognitive changes over time and evaluate the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions. A score below 20 typically indicates significant cognitive impairment.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Diana Guerrero Jaramillo, MsC

CONTACT

[email protected]

573172603503

Oscar Campo, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

573044140340

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Universidad Autonoma de Occidente

Other

Collaborators

  • Universidad del Valle, Colombia

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2027
First posted
Dec 11, 2024
Registry last updated
May 7, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.