Nerea
Bilbao, BIZKAIA, 48007, Spain
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07212283
This study evaluates the effectiveness of a wise Intervention to reduce aggressive behaviors and promote prosocial behaviors toward LGB-TNB individuals among Spanish adolescents. Half of the participants will receive the experimental intervention, while the other half will receive a control intervention.
Interested in participating?
Request Info14 year–18 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Bilbao, BIZKAIA, 48007, Spain
Location status: Recruiting
Discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity is a social problem of great relevance. Sexual orientation is understood as the mechanism that directs affective-sexual attraction and interest, manifesting with varying intensity. Regarding gender identity, it has historically been interpreted under a binary paradigm based on external sexual organs, rendering trans and non-binary identities invisible. However, it is currently understood as the internal feeling about one's own gender, so that trans and/or non-binary people represent those whose gender identity differs from the one assigned at birth.
Despite the growing visibility, public awareness, and recognition of the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, and non-binary people (LGB-TNB), discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity continues to be a social problem of great relevance with serious consequences for those who suffer it. This reality underlines the need to implement effective interventions aimed at addressing these aggressive behaviors and the mechanisms that sustain them, not only among those who perpetrate acts of violence, but also among people who witness these aggressive behaviors.
In addition, intervening during adolescence is especially relevant, as this stage represents a critical moment in the moral, social, and emotional development of individuals. Moreover, during adolescence, discriminatory behaviors and peer aggression increase, and previous studies show that LGB-TNB people face a higher risk of violence in educational settings. Nevertheless, although adolescence becomes a critical period for the development of risk behaviors, it also involves important transitions and learning opportunities. Furthermore, adolescence is a turning point during which well-designed interventions have a high potential to redirect a person's developmental trajectory in a lasting way. Therefore, it can be an especially favorable moment for implementing interventions.
In this way, numerous interventions have been carried out in educational settings to prevent aggressive behaviors among peers. Although most of these initiatives have mainly focused on more general problems, such as bullying and cyberbullying, in recent years preventive interventions specifically aimed at reducing aggressive behaviors based on sexual orientation and gender identity in both face-to-face and digital contexts have increased. However, most current interventions focus on educating people about issues related to LGB-TNB topics, reaching mixed and contradictory results regarding their effectiveness, and also highlighting that there is little empirical evidence about the robustness of the effects of LGB-TNB interventions and their underlying mechanisms. Therefore, these interventions present areas for improvement that constitute important challenges for scientific psychology.
Recently, interest has grown in social psychology regarding a new approach to interventions, which have been called wise interventions. Many of these interventions have impactful results because they are usually very brief in time and produce lasting changes in people's behavior. Moreover, this type of intervention is of great interest in adolescence, as they allow themselves to be designed in such a way that they are perceived as respectful of students' autonomy and status, so that they feel they are making their own decisions.
Therefore, the aim of this project is to adapt to the LGB-TNB context a wise intervention to reduce online and offline aggression among adolescents, especially based on sexual orientation and gender identity, and to increase the intention to support and prosocial behaviors when participants witness these aggressions, especially those directed at LGB-TNB people.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The intervention will be designed to reduce aggressive behaviors based on sexual orientation and gender identity and to promote prosocial behaviors toward these individuals. This intervention will include three components: (1) reading scientific studies about people's ability to change. In addition, they will read other studies about how thoughts and emotions influence behavior through brain pathways, and that these pathways can be modified under certain circumstances; (2) reading testimonials that support the idea that people can change. These testimonials include accounts of people who were victims or perpetrators based on sexual orientation and gender identity, including important components of empathy and prosocial behaviors toward the victims. To give credibility to the intervention, they will be informed that these stories were written by other young people who previously participated; and (3) self-persuasion exercises that involve an active commitment to change.
This intervention will be based on the same strategies as the experimental intervention, but it will not address aspects related to prosocial behaviors or aggression toward LGB-TNB individuals; instead, it will be applied to improve adolescents' eating habits.
Time frame: Assessments were conducted at baseline and at 3, 6, and 9 months.
It consists of seven items that ask frequency with wich participants have engaged in specific aggressive behavior toward LGB-TNB individuals. Five response categories are provided using a Likert-type response scale, ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (daily).
Time frame: Assessments were conducted at baseline and at 3, 6, and 9 months.
It consists of eight items that ask frequency with wich participants have engaged in online aggressive behavior toward LGB-TNB individuals. Five response categories are provided using a Likert-type response scale, ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (daily).
Time frame: Assessments were conducted at baseline and at 3, 6, and 9 months.
It consists of one item in which participants were asked to select all the behaviors they engaged in after witnessing an aggression.
Time frame: Assessments were conducted at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 3, 6, and 9 months.
This measure evaluate bystander intentions in response to LGB-TNB aggressions, through different scenarios. After reading the scenarios, participants answered five items that evaluated possible courses of action to take in response to the aggression.
Time frame: Assessments were conducted at baseline and at 3, 6, and 9 months.
It consists of eight items representing the eight mechanisms that allow participants to morally disengage. Five response categories are provided using a Likert-type response scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).
Time frame: Assessments were conducted at baseline and at 3, 6, and 9 months.
It consists of 10 items that assess sensitivity to unjust situations. Five response categories are provided using a Likert-type response scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).
Time frame: Assessments were conducted at baseline and at 3, 6, and 9 months.
It consists of five items that assess supportive behaviors toward LGB-TNB individuals. Five response categories are provided using a Likert-type response scale, ranging from 1 (0 times) to 5 (7 or more times).
Time frame: Assessments were conducted at baseline and at 3, 6, and 9 months.
A total of 25 items are used to assess microaggressions toward LGB-TNB individuals. Specifically, 20 items assess microaggressions toward LGB individuals and 5 items assess microaggressions toward TNB individuals. Five response categories are provided using a Likert-type response scale, ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (almost every week).
Time frame: Assessments were conducted at baseline and at 3, 6, and 9 months.
It consists of six items that ask about the frequency with which participants have engaged in aggressive behaviors in offline contexts. Five response categories are provided using a Likert-type response scale, ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (almost every week).
Time frame: Assessments were conducted at baseline and at 3, 6, and 9 months.
It consists of five items that ask about the frequency with which participants have engaged in aggressive behaviors in online contexts. Five response categories are provided using a Likert-type response scale, ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (almost every week).
Time frame: Assessments were conducted at baseline and at 3, 6, and 9 months.
It consists of 16 items that ask about the frequency of healthy and unhealthy food intake. Five response categories are provided using a Likert-type response scale, ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (daily).
Time frame: Assessments were conducted at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 3, 6, and 9 months.
It consists of seven items that assess the alignment between participants' healthy eating habits and their personal values. Five response categories are provided using a Likert-type response scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
University of Deusto
Other
Acronym: LGB-TNB
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01459835
Aberrant Motor Behavior in Dementia, Aggression
Seattle, Washington, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04045600
Aberrant Motor Behavior in Dementia, Aggression
Somerset, New Jersey, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07434479
Aberrant Motor Behavior in Dementia, Aggression
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04793776
Aberrant Motor Behavior in Dementia, Aggression
Tampa, Florida, United States
View Trial Details