Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00834548

Whole-Body MRA at 3T - A Comparison Between Two Different Scan Protocols

To compare to different approaches in whole-body magnetic resonance angiography of patients suffering peripheral arterial disease.

Our hypothesis is that use of a new protocol improves the diagnostic quality of the WB-MRA procedure.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev

Herlev Copenhagen, DK 2730, Denmark

About this study

Patients suffering peripheral arterial disease must undergo imaging procedures before endovascular or surgical procedures.

WB-MRA is an imaging procedure that can visualise the arterial system. WB-MRA can be performed in different manners. On option is to start the scan in the head region and continue down the body to the feet (standard protocol). Another option is to use a hybrid protocol that first examines the head and lower leg followed by examination of the pelvic and upper leg region.

A comparison between the standard and hybrid protocols has not been performed in a 3T high magnetic field system, therefore we will perform such a study.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Symptomatic lower extremity ischemia (claudication, ischemic wounds)
  • Referred to digital subtraction angiography (DSA)

Exclusion criteria

  • Renal insufficiency (GFR < 30 ml/min)
  • Contra-indications for MRI-examination (claustrophobia, metal-implants, pacemaker)
  • Dementia
  • Pregnancy/lactation
  • Allergy to gadolinium based MRI contrast agents
  • Acute disease

Treatment and study plan

Whole body magnetic resonance angiography (WB-MRA)

Procedure

WB-MRA will be performed once in each patient.

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic quality of WB-MRA

Secondary outcomes

  1. Signal to noise ratio

  2. Contrast to noise ratio

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev

Other

Collaborators

  • Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2008
Study completion
2008
First posted
Feb 3, 2009
Registry last updated
Feb 3, 2009

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.