Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04728243

WHO QualityRights E-training in Ghana

This is a cluster randomized controlled trial to determine the efficacy of the WHO QR online training compared with a placebo intervention in improving the knowledge about human rights, the attitudes towards people with psychosocial disabilities, and the practices related to substitute-decision making and coercion among mental health professionals.

Given the impact human rights violations have on the health of persons with psychosocial disabilities, an effort is needed to carry out methodologically strong research in this area. The study proposed will provide robust evidence to support further investment in interventions such as the WHO QualityRights training and make steps forward promoting the rights of people with psychosocial disabilities.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Ankaful Psychiatric Hospital, Cape Coast, Central Region, Ghana

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Background. People with psychosocial disabilities are commonly exposed to human rights violations within the mental health care system and in the general community. Such violations occur in all countries and are not only a problem from an ethical point of view but additionally have profound repercussions on the health of persons with psychosocial disabilities. Although psychiatric facilities are the very institutions responsible for the care and support of people with psychosocial disabilities, they are also often places in which persons with psychosocial disabilities are victims of inhumane treatments, including psychological, physical, and sexual abuse or violence. To stop these human rights violations, there is a need to reform mental health systems and thus change mental health professionals' practices leading to violations of people with psychosocial disabilities' rights. However, for this to happen, two main barriers need to be addressed. One barrier is the lack of human rights literacy among mental health professionals. The second barrier is that many mental health professionals hold negative attitudes towards people with psychosocial disabilities.

Recently, the World Health Organization (WHO) has developed the QualityRights (QR) online training. This training includes modules to increase knowledge about the rights of people with psychosocial disabilities and change the negative attitudes towards them and their role as rights holders. Furthermore, the training provides mental health providers with the skills necessary to advocate for a human rights-based approach in mental health. Currently, there is a growing interest in the QualityRights training, and the WHO is implementing it in different countries. However, the efficacy of this intervention has not been rigorously evaluated.

Objectives. To determine the efficacy of the QR online training compared with a placebo intervention (online training on Coronavirus Disease - 2019) in improving the knowledge about human rights, the attitudes towards people with psychosocial disabilities, and the practices related to substitute-decision making and coercion among mental health professionals.

Methods. This is a cluster randomized controlled trial (cRCT) being conducted in Ghana. An estimated sample of 252 mental health professionals will be recruited from across 28 clusters within three psychiatric hospitals. Participants will be divided in two arms to receive either the WHO QR online training on human rights issues in mental health or the WHO Coronavirus online training for health professionals. The primary outcomes, assessed post-training, at 3 months, and at 6 months are increase in the knowledge about human rights and mental health and improvement on the attitudes towards persons with psychosocial disabilities. Secondary outcomes, assessed at 3 and 6 months, consist of improvements in the mental health professionals' practices, burn-out levels, and well-being. All data will be collected online.

Discussion. Given the impact human rights violations have on the health of persons with psychosocial disabilities, an effort is needed to carry out methodologically strong research in this area. The study proposed will provide robust evidence to support further investment in interventions such as the WHO QualityRights training and make steps forward promoting the rights of people with psychosocial disabilities.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Able to speak English. English is an official language of Ghana and is used as a lingua franca throughout the country. English is also the most used of the eleven official languages spoken in Ghana .
  • Mental health professionals currently working in the in-patient units of the three psychiatric hospitals selected for the study (all in the Accra area)

Exclusion criteria

  • Persons who participated to the in-person WHO QualityRights trainings held in Ghana.
  • Persons enrolled in the online WHO QualityRights training. .

Treatment and study plan

WHO QualityRights e-training

Other

The WHO QualityRights online training aims to increase knowledge about the rights of people with psychosocial disabilities and change negative attitudes towards these persons and their role as rights holders. Furthermore, the training provides mental health professionals with the skills necessary to support people with psychosocial disabilities to advocate for their rights. The WHO QualityRights online training includes five core modules: 1) Human rights; 2) Mental health, disability, and human rights; 3) The right to health and recovery; 4) Legal capacity and the right to decide; 5) Free from coercion, violence, and abuse. Each module is composed of presentations, videos, interactive exercises, and forum discussions involving all participants. In the online training forum discussions, particular attention will be given to issues relevant to the Ghanaian context.

WHO COVID-19 online training

Other

The WHO novel coronavirus 2019 online training series provides a general introduction to COVID-19 and similar respiratory infections and information on what facilities and professionals should be doing to prevent and respond to COVID-19 cases. The training is similar in length to the WHO QualityRights training (13 h 15 min vs. 19 hours) and is intended for health professionals and other stakeholders.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline knowledge about human rights of persons with psychosocial disabilities post-training

    Time frame: pre-training, immediately post-training

    World Health Organization's Knowledge about the Rights of persons with psychosocial disabilities questionnaire: Questionnaire to assess knowledge about the rights included in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Scores range between 0 and 23. Higher score indicates higher level of knowledge.

  2. Change from Baseline attitudes towards persons with psychosocial disabilities role as rights-holders post-training

    Time frame: pre-training, immediately post-training

    World Health Organization's questionnaire on the attitudes towards people with psychosocial disabilities as rights-holders. Scores range between 17 and 85. Higher score indicates more negative attitudes.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline Practices related to substitute-decision making and coercion scale at 3 months

    Time frame: pre-training, at 3 months

    Practices related to substitute-decision making and coercion questionnaire. Scale to measure the use of substitute-decision making and coercive practices in mental health units. This questionnaire includes two sub-scales. The first range is between 7 and 49. A high score indicates practices related to substitute-decision making and coercion are used frequently by the respondent. The second range is between 5 and 25. High scores indicate that the mental health professionals working in the units of the respondents are more willing to use practices related to substitute-decision making and coercion than they are.

  2. Change from Baseline Seclusion and Restraint Experience post-training

    Time frame: pre-training, immediately post-training

    Seclusion and Restraint Experience Questionnaire (SREQ) - modified version. Questionnaire to measure emotional and ethical experiences linked to the use of seclusion and restraint among health professionals. Scores range between 25 and 100. Higher scores indicates higher endorsement of specific experiences.

  3. Change from Baseline Burnout at 3 months

    Time frame: pre-training, at 3 months

    Abbreviated Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI). Inventory to measure burn-out among health professionals. Scores range between 9 and 27. Higher scores indicate higher burnout.

  4. Change from Baseline Quality of Life at 3 months

    Time frame: pre-training, at 3 months

    World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF)Questionnaire to measure quality of life during the last month. Scores range between 0 and 100. Higher scores denote higher quality of life.

Other outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline knowledge about human rights of persons with psychosocial disabilities at 3 months

    Time frame: pre-training, at 3 months

    World Health Organization's Knowledge about the Rights of persons with psychosocial disabilities questionnaire: Questionnaire to assess knowledge about the rights included in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Scores range between 0 and 23. Higher score indicates higher level of knowledge.

  2. Change from Baseline knowledge about human rights of persons with psychosocial disabilities at 6 months

    Time frame: pre-training, at 6 months

    World Health Organization's Knowledge about the Rights of persons with psychosocial disabilities questionnaire: Questionnaire to assess knowledge about the rights included in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Scores range between 0 and 23. Higher score indicates higher level of knowledge.

  3. Change from Baseline attitudes towards persons with psychosocial disabilities role as rights-holders at 3 months

    Time frame: pre-training, at 3 months

    World Health Organization's questionnaire on the attitudes towards people with psychosocial disabilities as rights-holders. Scores range between 17 and 85. Higher score indicates more negative attitudes.

  4. Change from Baseline attitudes towards persons with psychosocial disabilities role as rights-holders at 6 months

    Time frame: pre-training, at 6 months

    World Health Organization's questionnaire on the attitudes towards people with psychosocial disabilities as rights-holders. Scores range between 17 and 85. Higher score indicates more negative attitudes.

  5. Change from Baseline Practices related to substitute-decision making and coercion scale at 6 months

    Time frame: pre-training, at 6 months

    Scale to measure the use of substitute-decision making and coercive practices in mental health units. This questionnaire includes two sub-scales. The first range is between 7 and 49. A high score indicates practices related to substitute-decision making and coercion are used frequently by the respondent. The second range is between 5 and 25. High scores indicate that the mental health professionals working in the units of the respondents are more willing to use practices related to substitute-decision making and coercion than they are.

  6. Change from Baseline Burnout at 6 months

    Time frame: pre-training, at 6 months

    Abbreviated Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI). Inventory to measure burn-out among health professionals. Scores range between 9 and 27. Higher scores indicate higher burnout.

  7. Change from Baseline Quality of Life at 6 months

    Time frame: pre-training, at 6 months

    World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) Questionnaire to measure quality of life during the last month. Scores range between 0 and 100. Higher scores denote higher quality of life

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Mental Health Society of Ghana

Other

Collaborators

  • Columbia University
  • Mental Health Authority of Ghana
  • University of Cagliari
  • World Health Organization

Registry information

Official study title

WHO QualityRights Online Training for Mental Health Workers in Ghana

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2023
First posted
Jan 28, 2021
Registry last updated
Feb 15, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.