Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05935124

White Light vs Narrow Band Imagingin the Diagnosis of Right Sided Colonic Polyps in Asymptomatic Subjects Undergoing Screening Colonoscopy

A randomized controlled crossover study to determine if narrow band imaging or white light endoscopy is superior in detecting right colonic polyps in average risk subjects undergoing screening colonoscopy

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Westmead Hospital

Sydney, New South Wales, 2145, Australia

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Michael Bourke

CONTACT

88905555

About this study

Removal of colorectal adenomas prevents occurrence of cancers. It is recognized that colonoscopy can miss colorectal adenomas and early cancers. Proximal colon polyp detection rate is lower compared to distal colon detection rates. This may be partially due to the higher prevalence of flat polyps and sessile serrated adenomas (SSAs) which are harder to visualize. There is a need to further improve performance of colonoscopy. A second evaluation of the right colon within the same procedure may yield an additional detection rate of 5-10%, however retro-flexion has not proven to be superior to a second forward viewing examination. The use of chromo-endoscopy has been shown to improve detection of flat adenomas. Narrow band imaging was introduced in year 2006. It is similar to chromo-endoscopy in that it provides more mucosal details. This enables endoscopists to accurately describe the pit pattern of adenomas. NBI has been used as a substitute to chromo-endoscopy. In pooled analysis, NBI is comparable to chromo-endoscopy in their sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of malignant colorectal adenomas. Unfortunately, the use of NBI has not been shown to conclusively improve rate of colorectal adenoma detection. Two of 3 randomized trials that compared WLE to NBI showed a higher adenoma detection rate with the use of NBI. In a study by Rex et al., the rate was however similar with either modality. In a pooled analysis, NBI was only marginally better than WLE.

The effective use of NBI depends on the quality of bowel preparation and the experience of endoscopist. In the presence of fecal matters, NBI tends to be dark and detection of small adenomas becomes difficult. The prototype bright NBI coupled with high definition resolution is likely to overcome this drawback of original NBI.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Asymptomatic subjects undergoing screening colonoscopy
  • age > 50.
  • average risk subjects defined as those without a personal history of inflammatory bowel disease, colon adenoma or cancer or family history of FAP or Familial non-polyposis syndrome or first degree relatives having diagnosed to have colo-rectal carcinoma, no colonoscopy in past 5 years and, ability to provide a written consent to trial participation

Exclusion criteria

  • unable to consent

Treatment and study plan

WLE first, then B-NBI

Diagnostic Test

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of right sided polyp detection with WLE and B-NBI

    Time frame: 1 day

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rate of the detection of SSPs in the right colon with WLE and B-NBI

    Time frame: 1 day

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Michael Bourke, MBBS

CONTACT

8890555

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Western Sydney Local Health District

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized Comparison Between White Light Endoscopy (WLE) and Bright Narrow Band Imaging (B-NBI) in the Diagnosis of Right Sided Colonic Polyps in Asymptomatic Subjects Undergoing Screening Colonoscopy

Acronym: WLEvsB-NBI

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Jul 7, 2023
Registry last updated
Mar 30, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.