Englewood Health
Englewood, New Jersey, 07631, United States
NCT Number: NCT04095702
This study will determine if it is beneficial to use a weighted pacifier in neonates.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me30 week–37 week
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Englewood, New Jersey, 07631, United States
RCI-Pacifiers have been utilized for decades in the NICU to provide benifical Non-Nutritive Suck. They have been instrumental in transitioning premature infants from gavage to breast feeding Yiallouerou, S, et al, studied the effects of dummy/pacifier on autonomic activity during sleep and found pacifier use to be protective during sleep. Risks and Benefits of Pacifiers have cleary been identified Sexton, S and Natsale, R have identified that nonnutritive suck is a natural reflex for a fetus and newborn. Traditionally, the pacifier has been used as a method for fulfilling an infants innate desire to suckle. Study subjects will be introduced to either a standard/traditional pacifier (without stabilizing/weighted attachment) or a stabilizing/weighted pacifier. Standard/traditional pacifiers will be issued to patients that have been assigned an odd number study identifier and , stabilzing/weighted pacifiers will be issued to patients that have been assigned an even number study identifier. All eligible infants born at 30 weeks to 37.6 weeks who meet study criteria will be included. All staff/caregivers will be trained in proper placement of a stabilizing pacifier prior to use. Stabilizing pacifiers will not be placed on the infants chest. Traditional pacifiers will be used as standard of care at EH. The Neonatal Infant Pain Score (NIPS) scale and a caregiver survey will be used to determine efficacy.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion
Exclusion
The weighted pacifier is a standard of care pacifier with a weighted, breathable star attachment to help keep the pacifier from popping out of the neonates mouth during non-nutritive suck.
The non-weighted pacifier is a standard of care pacifier that a neonate would receive if they were not part of this study.
Time frame: 48 hours
To determine if the weighted pacifier is safe in supporting non-nutritive suck. Neonates will be measured in facial expression, cry, breathing pattern, and state of arousal. Each category get a rating of 0 or 1, with 0 being negative and 1 being positive.
Time frame: 48 hours
To determine if the weighted pacifier is efficient in supporting non-nutritive suck. The neonates will be observed for a period of 10 minutes each time the pacifier is introduced. The observer will count the amount of time the neonate's pacifier pop from his/her mouth.
Time frame: 48 hours
To determine if a stabilized pacifier reduces infant stress/discomfort
Time frame: 48 hours
To determine if a caregiver's stress level decreases when an infant is provided with a stabilizing/weighted pacifier versus a traditional pacifier. The scale will consist of questions asking about the caregiver's stress. The caregiver will answer the questions with a 1-5 rating, with 1 being strongly disagree and 5 being strongly agree.
Englewood Hospital and Medical Center
Other
A Pilot Study to Look at the Use of Stabilizing (Weighted) Pacifier vs. the Use of a Traditional Non-Stabilizing (Non-Weighted) Pacifier to Improve Infant Comfort, Caregiver Satisfaction, and Safety During Non-Nutritive Sucking
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06065839
Non-nutritive Sucking
Taoyuan, Kwei-Shan District, Taiwan
View Trial Details