Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06194162

Weighted Blankets for Sleep Disturbance Among Children With ADHD

Many children with ADHD suffer from sleep disorders and dysfunction, which may affect development and well-being. According to the clinicians, some children find relief from restlessness and difficulty sleeping by using weighted blankets which have been proposed to reduce restlessness and stress via sensory integration and to calm the child by stimulating the sense of touch, muscles and joints. However, evidence for an effect on sleep is scarce, and only one RCT has investigated the effect of weighted blankets among children with ADHD. Using a RCT design, the aim is to investigate the effect on sleep disorders and dysfunction in children with ADHD aged 5-12 years by (1) using a weighted blanket during night and daytime in addition to usual treatment, compared to (2) usual treatment and a non-weighted sham blanket, with the primary outcome being differences in total sleep time. Results will support health- and social professionals who are involved in the treatment of children with ADHD.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

5 year–12 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital

Frederiksberg, 2000, Denmark

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Elisabeth Ginnerup-Nielsen

CONTACT

About this study

Over the past decade, interest in the relationship between sleep difficulties and ADHD has increased, with evidence showing that sleep problems are very common among school children with ADHD, affecting nearly three-quarters. Sleep problems may worsening daytime behaviors and may also affect the overall wellbeing of the family, leading to poorer parental mental health and higher stress. According to the clinicians, some children find relief from restlessness and difficulty sleeping by using weighted blankets which have been proposed to reduce restlessness and stress via sensory integration and to calm the child by stimulating the sense of touch, muscles and joints. However, evidence for an effect on sleep is scarce, and only one RCT has investigated the effect of weighted blankets among children with ADHD. Using a RCT design, the aim is to investigate the effect on sleep disorders and dysfunction in children with ADHD aged 5-12 years by (1) using a weighted blanket during night and daytime in addition to usual treatment, compared to (2) usual treatment and a non-weighted sham blanket, with the primary outcome being differences in total sleep time.

The study is designed as a superiority trial: a parallel group, randomised controlled trial, where participants are randomised to one of two study arms 1:1. The sample consists of 340 participants, divided into two groups. After randomisation each participant will stay in their assigned treatment arm during the entire study. For each study participant, the active intervention period is 28 days with assessment of primary and secondary outcomes at baseline and after 28 days of intervention. Thereafter participants will be followed through national health registers.

The trial will take place at the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Center, Mental Health Services in the Capital Region of Denmark. This center is providing assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with psychiatric disorders.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Signed informed consent.
  • Age 5-12 years (both included) at randomization.
  • Primary diagnosis of ADHD according to ICD-10 code F90.0, F90.1, F90.9 or F98.8.
  • Comorbidities are allowed.
  • Participated in a usual care sleep hygiene program managed by clinicians without effect within 6 months prior to enrollment.
  • If on ADHD medication or/and melatonin/sleep medication the dose must be stable, at least two weeks prior to enrollment.
  • The child and caregiver have adequate mastery of the Danish language.

Exclusion criteria

  • Have used any type of medical device class 1 weighted blanket before.
  • Any diagnosed diseases that markedly compromises the participant's ability to adhere to the intervention (like mental retardation, severe underweight, chronic respiratory or circulatory conditions, surgical implants, osteoporosis).
  • Another member of the household enrolled in the trial.

Treatment and study plan

Weighted blanket

Device

The intervention group will receive a weighted blanket classified as a medical device class 1 as an add on to usual treatment. Participants will be asked to choose one out of at least three different weighted blankets, each with different weight classes. The choice of weighted blanket is solely taken by the participant after having tried all five blankets.

Adherence to the weighted blanket intervention is defined as reported use 60 % of the intervention period.

Usual treatment as part of standard care for children with ADHD, which can consist of sleep hygiene, psychoeducation, cognitive behavioral theory, medications such as melatonin or ADHD medication.

Non-weighted blanket

Device

The control comparator will receive a sham intervention in the form of a non-weighted blanket as an add on to usual care. Participants will be asked to choose one out of two different sham blankets.

Usual treatment as part of standard care for children with ADHD, which can consist of sleep hygiene, psychoeducation, cognitive behavioral theory, medications such as melatonin or ADHD medication.

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in total sleep time (average minutes per day)

    Time frame: Week 0 and 4

    Total sleep time (TST) is defined as the time of total sleep episode minus the awake time (the entire time spent sleeping) and reported in minutes per day. TST per day will be measured using actigraphy in form of MotionWare 8 (The MotionWare 8®-CamNtech MotionWare).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in functional impairment

    Time frame: Week 0 and 4

    Functioning impairment will be measured using Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale (WFIRS-P). The WFIRS-P is a 50-item scale assessment tool where caregivers rate the impact of their child's emotional or behavioural problems in the previous month on six separate domains: (A) Family (ten items); (B) School and learning; (C) Life skills; (D) Child's self-concept; (E) Social activities; and (F) Risky activities. Each item is rated on a four-point scale from 0 ('never or not at all') to 3 ('very often or very much') or rated as 'not applicable'. The instrument uses a likert scale such that any item rating 2 or 3 is clinically impaired. The mean of all scored items for each domain will be calculated. Furthermore, a single overall WFIRS-P score will also be calculated as the average of the six domain scores.

  2. Changes in sleep onset latency (average minutes per day)

    Time frame: Week 0 and 4

    Sleep onset latency (SOL) refers to the period of time between turning lights out to go to sleep and falling asleep. SOL will be measured using actigraphy which includes a button that should be pressed by a caregiver when the lights are turned off. SOL will be reported as minutes per day.

  3. Changes in number of awakenings (numbers per night)

    Time frame: Week 0 and 4

    Wake after sleep is defined as number of minutes scored as wake during sleep period and will be measured using actigraphy.

  4. Changes in sleep efficiency (percentage)

    Time frame: Week 0 and 4

    Sleep efficiency (SE) is measured using actigraphy and is the actual sleep time expressed as a percentage of the total time in bed (the time elapsed between "lights out" and "get up time"). SE will be reported as minutes per day.

  5. Changes in ADHD core symptoms (score point)

    Time frame: Week 0 and 4

    ADHD core symptoms will be measured with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) parent version. It is a 26-item questionnaire including the 18 original ADHD-RS-IV items supplied with 8 conduct problem items. All items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale (0-3), where 0 represents never or rarely, 1 is sometimes, 2 is often, and 3 is very often. From the item scores, a total score ranging 0-78 will be calculated. Further, three sub-scores will be calculated; inattentive scale: range 0-27, hyperactive/impulsive scale: range 0-27, and conduct scale: range 0-24.

  6. Changes in parental stress (score point)

    Time frame: Week 0 and 4

    Changes in parental stress is measured by the Parental Stress Scale (PSS). The PSS is an 18-item questionnaire assessing parents' feelings about their parenting role, exploring both positive aspects (e.g. emotional benefits, personal development) and negative aspects of parenthood (e.g. demands on resources, feelings of stress). Parents can agree or disagree in terms of their typical relationship with their child or children. Responses are scored as follows: strongly disagree, disagree, undecided, agree, strongly agree. To compute the parental stress score, items 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 17, and 18 should be reversely scored as follows: (1=5) (2=4) (3=3) (4=2) (5=1). The item scores are then summed. Parental stress scores range from 18 to 90, with lower scores indicating lower levels of parental stress.

  7. Changes in child quality of life (score point)

    Time frame: Week 0 and 4

    Child quality of life will be measured using The World Health Organisation- Child Well-Being Index (WHO-5). The WHO-5 Child Wellbeing Index is a simple self-reported measure of children's psychological wellbeing. The tool consists of five statements describing a positive state. The child is asked to say how often they felt that way during the past two weeks, by selecting one of the following options: All the time, Often, Sometimes, Rarely or Never.

  8. Adverse events (Number of participants with adverse events)

    Time frame: During intervention

    Number of participants with adverse events (AE).

  9. Serious adverse events (Number of participants with serious adverse events)

    Time frame: During intervention

    Number of participants with serious adverse events (SAE).

Other outcomes

  1. Changes in sensory modulation disorder (score point)

    Time frame: Week 0 and 4

    Changes from baseline to end of treatment in the caregiver-rated Sensory Processing Measure 2 (SPM-2). The 80 likert-type items include eight different scales: social participation, vision, hearing, touch, taste and smell, body awareness, balance and motion and finally planning and ideas, which capture related but separate aspects of sensory processing difficulties. Responses never, occasionally, frequently, or always correspond to the numeric values 1 to 4 respectively, to indicate the frequency of behaviors. A total raw score is calculated with a higher score suggesting greater dysfunction. Raw scores are also converted to T-scores and percentile scores that can fall into three ranges. T-scores in the range of 40 to 59 represent Typical functioning, T-scores in the range of 60 to 69 represent moderate difficulties in functioning, and T-scores of 70 or above represent severe difficulties in functioning.

  2. Cost effectiveness

    Time frame: Week 0 and 4

    Assessed by health economic aspects, such as quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and productivity loss among caregivers.

  3. Changes in functional impairment

    Time frame: 2 years after end of treatment.

    Functioning impairment will be measured using Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale (WFIRS-P). The WFIRS-P is a 50-item scale assessment tool where caregivers rate the impact of their child's emotional or behavioural problems in the previous month on six separate domains: (A) Family (ten items); (B) School and learning; (C) Life skills; (D) Child's self-concept; (E) Social activities; and (F) Risky activities. Each item is rated on a four-point scale from 0 ('never or not at all') to 3 ('very often or very much') or rated as 'not applicable'. The instrument uses a likert scale such that any item rating 2 or 3 is clinically impaired. The mean of all scored items for each domain will be calculated. Furthermore, a single overall WFIRS-P score will also be calculated as the average of the six domain scores.

  4. Changes in ADHD core symptoms (score point)

    Time frame: 2 years after end of treatment.

    ADHD core symptoms will be measured with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) parent version. It is a 26-item questionnaire including the 18 original ADHD-RS-IV items supplied with 8 conduct problem items. All items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale (0-3), where 0 represents never or rarely, 1 is sometimes, 2 is often, and 3 is very often. From the item scores, a total score ranging 0-78 will be calculated. Further, three sub-scores will be calculated; inattentive scale: range 0-27, hyperactive/impulsive scale: range 0-27, and conduct scale: range 0-24.

  5. Changes in parental stress (score point)

    Time frame: 2 years after end of treatment.

    Parental stress is measured by the Parental Stress Scale (PSS). The PSS is an 18-item questionnaire assessing parents' feelings about their parenting role, exploring both positive aspects (e.g. emotional benefits, personal development) and negative aspects of parenthood (e.g. demands on resources, feelings of stress). Parents can agree or disagree in terms of their typical relationship with their child or children. Responses are scored as follows: strongly disagree, disagree, undecided, agree, strongly agree. To compute the parental stress score, items 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 17, and 18 should be reversely scored as follows: (1=5) (2=4) (3=3) (4=2) (5=1). The item scores are then summed. Parental stress scores range from 18 to 90, with lower scores indicating lower levels of parental stress.

  6. Changes in child quality of life (score point)

    Time frame: 2 years after end of treatment.

    Child quality of life will be measured using The World Health Organisation- Child Well-Being Index (WHO-5). The WHO-5 Child Wellbeing Index is a simple self-reported measure of children's psychological wellbeing. The tool consists of five statements describing a positive state. The child is asked to say how often they felt that way during the past two weeks, by selecting one of the following options: All the time, Often, Sometimes, Rarely or Never.

  7. Cost effectiveness

    Time frame: 2 years after end of treatment.

    Assessed by health economic aspects, such as quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and productivity loss among caregivers.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Ina O. Specht, Ph.d.

CONTACT

[email protected]

+45 51197904

Jeanett F. Rohde, Ph.d.

CONTACT

[email protected]

+45 51197904

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg

Other

Collaborators

  • Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital

Registry information

Official study title

Impact of Weighted Blankets on Sleep Disturbance Among Children With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorders: A Pragmatic Randomised Trial

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2028
First posted
Jan 8, 2024
Registry last updated
Jan 17, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.