University of Virginia - Center for Diabetes Technology
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903, United States
NCT Number: NCT04439903
This project focuses on embedding the participants' own diabetes data into state-of-the-art technology platforms to constitute a novel educational simulation interface for decision-support in Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) - the Web-based Simulation Tool (WST).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me21 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903, United States
The Web-based Simulation Tool (WST) allows patients with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) to not only visualize their data, but also to explore changes to their meals and insulin parameters, and easily estimate their potential clinical impact. WST is an educational tool, and as such, it does not have prescriptive power. This platform collects glucose, insulin and meal data from the participants' insulin pump, and generates personalized models of their glucose metabolism. Both data collection and model personalization are backend processes, that is, without user intervention.
Participants can interact with WST through a user interface (UI) that is equipped with a dashboard page, where they can:
(i) select a particular date range using a calendar to visualize their historical glucose control, such as glucose traces, and time in range;
(ii) control the amount of information on the screen - users can show/hide more details, such as glucose variability;
(iii) select different insulin therapy parameters: basal rate, insulin sensitivity factor, and carbohydrate ratio;
(iv) change their values by moving a slider;
(v) select informed meals within the selected date range, and modify their time and size by moving a slider;
(vi) run a simulation with the modified insulin therapy parameters and meals by tapping a button;
(vii) save the insulin and meal settings of the simulations to compare multiple configurations; and
(viii) generate a report from the selected simulation, comparing both original and simulated or replay data.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Glucose, insulin and meal data from the participants' insulin pump will be collected and entered into the WST, which will generate personalized models of the participants' glucose metabolism to enable replay simulations.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 5 (Post-intervention)
Technology Expectation (TE) and Technology Acceptance (TA) questionnaires are made of 27 items. Responses to the TE questionnaire were collected at week 0 (baseline), and responses to the TA questionnaire at week 5 (post-intervention). Each questionnaire has 5 categories: burdens (14 items), benefits (10 items), ease of use, usefulness, and trustworthiness (last 3, 1 item each). Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5 (from strongly disagree to strongly agree for burdens and benefits, and from very poor to excellent for ease of use, usefulness, and trustworthiness). Here we report the results for burdens and benefits. The original 1-to-5 scale is converted to a 0-to-4 scale, the mean scores for burdens and benefits are averaged and then converted into a percentage ranging from 0% to 100%. Higher percentages mean a better outcome for benefits and a worse outcome for burdens.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 5 (Post-intervention)
Technology Expectation (TE) and Technology Acceptance (TA) questionnaires are made of 27 items. Responses to the TE questionnaire were collected at week 0 (baseline), and responses to the TA questionnaire at week 5 (post-intervention). Each questionnaire has 5 categories: burdens (14 items), benefits (10 items), ease of use, usefulness, and trustworthiness (last 3, 1 item each). Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5 (from strongly disagree to strongly agree for burdens and benefits, and from very poor to excellent for ease of use, usefulness, and trustworthiness). Here we report the results for ease of use, usefulness, and trustworthiness of the system. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 5 (Post-intervention)
The Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS) is a 17-item scale that yields a total diabetes distress score plus 4 subscale scores: Emotional burden (5 items), regimen distress (5 items), interpersonal distress (3 items) and physician distress (4 items). Scores range from 1 to 6 (from Not a problem to A very serious problem). To compute the total diabetes distress score and the 4 subscale scores, participants' responses in each scale are summed and divided by the corresponding number of items. A mean item score lower than 2.0 is considered little or no distress, between 2.0 and 2.9 is considered moderate distress, and higher than 3.0 is considered high distress. Thus, higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: First Week (Observation) and Following 4 Weeks (Intervention)
The percentage of time spent in 70-180 mg/dL (time in range, TIR) is computed per participant on a weekly basis (1 week of observation, 4 weeks of intervention) using glucose sensor data. The higher the TIR the better the glucose control. Percentages during the intervention period are averaged per participant, thus obtaining 2 TIRs for each participant (one Observation TIR and one Intervention TIR). A linear regression analysis is performed to infer the impact (if any) of the duration and frequency of participants' interaction with the Web-Based Simulation Tool (predictor variables) on variations in TIR between Observation and Intervention periods (response variable).
Predictor variable 1: Number of simulations per participant per week. Predictor variable 2: Minutes of interaction with the Web-Based Simulation Tool per participant per week.
Response variable: Intervention TIR - Observation TIR. The higher the response variable the better the outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 5 (Post-intervention)
Perceived regimen distress is estimated at Baseline and Week 5 (Post-intervention) using the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS). Scores range from 1 to 6 (from Not a problem to A very serious problem). Participants' responses to the DSS's regimen distress items are summed and divided by the number of items in that scale. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. Scores at week 5 are compared with scores at baseline and used in a linear regression analysis to infer the impact (if any) of the duration and frequency of participants' interaction with the Web-Based Simulation Tool (predictor variables) on variations in treatment satisfaction (response variable).
Predictor variable 1: Number of simulations per participant per week. Predictor variable 2: Minutes of interaction with the Web-Based Simulation Tool per participant per week.
Response variable: Regimen distress score at week 5 - Regimen distress score at baseline. The higher the response variable the worse.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 5 (Post-intervention)
Perceived emotional burden is estimated at Baseline and Week 5 (Post-intervention) using the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS). Scores range from 1 to 6 (from Not a problem to a very serious problem). Participants' responses to the DSS's emotional burden items are summed and divided by the number of items in that scale. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. Scores at week 5 are compared with scores at baseline and used in a linear regression analysis to infer the impact (if any) of the duration and frequency of participants' interaction with the Web-Based Simulation Tool (predictor variables) on variations in treatment satisfaction (response variable).
Predictor variable 1: Number of simulations per participant per week. Predictor variable 2: Minutes of interaction with the Web-Based Simulation Tool per participant per week.
Response variable: Emotional burden score at week 5 - Emotional burden score at baseline.
The higher the response variable the worse.
University of Virginia
Other
Acronym: WST
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05488119
Autoimmune Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus
Stanford, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07696780
Autoimmune Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus
Bern, Canton of Bern, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT05610111
Autoimmune Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06308549
Autoimmune Diseases, Diabetes Distress
Bad Mergentheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
View Trial Details