Energy Voucher
BehavioralReceive the intervention the first winter enrolled in the study. The intervention is a electricity voucher and a short pamphlet describing how to work out how much heat the voucher can buy.
NCT Number: NCT01627418
Aim
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether fuel subsidies reduce exacerbations of COPD among people aged over 55, and therefore whether providing such subsidies is a cost-beneficial policy initiative.
The Warm Homes for Elder New Zealanders Study enrolled community-dwelling people aged over 55 with moderate or worse COPD. Prior to the study commencing the houses were insulated (if feasible, & the house-owner agreed). Data were collected on the health and energy use of the participants.
The households randomly assigned to the "early" intervention group had a subsidy to their power account their first winter in the study. The subsidy was the intervention and was designed to enable the participants, if they chose to do so, to keep their house warmer during the winter.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me55 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Wellington / Hutt/ Porirua, Wellington, Wellington Region, New Zealand
Warm Homes for Elder New Zealanders (WHEZ)
Background Although there has been considerable recent work on the prevention, management and causes of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), the contribution of housing has not been well researched. This is despite the socio-economic patterning of COPD (Maori women have the highest rate of COPD that has been recorded for any group of women), and the relationship between socio-economic deprivation and housing conditions.
It is likely that improved heating would reduce exacerbations of COPD as:
The percentage of people over 65 in New Zealand will increase from 12% to 22% over the next 25 years. Therefore it will become increasingly important to find cost-effective ways of reducing the morbidity of the older age group. As COPD is a significant cause of morbidity amongst older people, this study investigates a potentially cost effective intervention to reduce both the likelihood of expensive hospital stays and improve the quality of life for older people.
Aim To evaluate whether fuel subsidies reduce exacerbations of COPD among people aged over 55, and therefore whether providing such subsidies is a cost-beneficial policy initiative.
Potential Benefits The potential benefits of the study include reducing the burden of disease. The patients and their caregivers may experience improved quality of life. Hospitals may experience fewer patients requiring treatment during the winter. A cost-benefit analysis will quantify the benefits.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
OR - In the last three years either went to hospital for their COPD or took antibiotics/steriods for their COPD
Exclusion criteria
Receive the intervention the first winter enrolled in the study. The intervention is a electricity voucher and a short pamphlet describing how to work out how much heat the voucher can buy.
Do not receive the money or pamphlet in the initial study year
Time frame: Four months
Time frame: Four months
Time frame: Four months
Time frame: Four months
Time frame: Four months
Time frame: Four months
Time frame: Four months
Time frame: Four months
Time frame: Four months
Time frame: course of study ( up to 18 months)
Time frame: course of study (up to 18 months)
Time frame: course of study (up to 18 months)
University of Otago
Other
Warm Homes for Elder New Zealanders: a Community Trial of People With COPD
Acronym: WHEZ
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05984823
Chronic Disease, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Leicester, Leicestershire, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT05572333
COPD, Chronic Disease
Frankfurt, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT03641235
Chronic Disease, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Bordeaux, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05984680
Chronic Disease, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
View Trial Details