Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01824108

Wallis Interspinous Dynamic Stability System for Lumbar Disc Herniation: a Prospective Study

Lumbar disc herniation is usually treated by discectomy alone. Nonfusion system such as Wallis interspinous implants have also been successfully used in disc degenerative diseases. However, the superiority of a discectomy with Wallis in comparison to a discectomy alone for primary lumbar disc herniation has yet to be determined.The aim of our study is to investigate whether lumbar discectomy combined with the Wallis device provides better radiographic and clinical short-term outcome than posterior lumbar discectomy alone.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Guangdong Gerneral Hospital

Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080, China

About this study

The most commonly used therapy for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) are partial discectomy or discectomy with fusion if there was an additional mechanical disorder in the underlying functional spinal unit. However, the problems associated with discectomy are intervertebral disc height loss and the segmental instability, thought to be a risk for failed back surgery syndrome or recurrence lumbar disc herniation. Fusion has also been criticised for its side effects of adjacent segment degeneration(ASD), pseudarthrosis and bone-graft morbidity. To prevent such complications , a new family of dynamic implants have been established. Wallis interspinous implant (Abbott Laboratories, Bordeaux, France) , invented by J. Senegas, is one of them. It consisted of a interspinous blocker made out of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) to limit extension and two dacron tapes around the spinous processes in order to secure the implant and limit flexion. The aim of using this device is to unload the facet joints, to restore foraminal height and to provide sufficient stability especially in extension but still allow motion in the treated segment. Previous clinical trials and biomechanical studies are promising, however, the superiority of a discectomy with Wallis in comparison to a discectomy alone for primary lumbar disc herniation has yet to be determined. The purpose of this prospective controlled study was to evaluate the clinical effect of lumbar discectomy combined with Wallis interspinous device, comparing with posterior lumbar discectomy alone. Our hypothesis was that the use of the Wallis device would have better clinical and radiological outcomes than lumbar discectomy alone.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18-70 years old;
  • complaining low back pain or radioactive melosalgia;
  • preoperative image examination showing disc herniation or spinal stenosis caused by herniation of responsible level;
  • no improvement in symptoms after 6-10 weeks of non-surgical treatment.

Exclusion criteria

  • previous operations;
  • congenital spinal deformity;
  • lumbar fracture;
  • infection;
  • autoimmune diseases;
  • serious osteoporosis;
  • morbidly obese;

Treatment and study plan

lumbar discectomy

Procedure

All the patients were in prone positions on the operation table and received general anesthesia. A midline incision was made and paravertebral muscles were dissected unilaterally. Disc excision and nerve root decompression were initially accomplished through a unilateral transflaval approach. Then the wound was closed with a suction drain.

Lumbar discectomy combined with Wallis interspinous dynamic stability system

Procedure

The Wallis interspinous implant is placed after a lumbar discectomy. Interspinal ligaments of operated segment were removed and supraspinal ligament were retained. And then the proper size of Wallis implant was mounted underneath the supraspinous ligament and secured to the spine with the attached Dacron bands,above and below the corresponding spinous processes.

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 2 days before intervention

    Time frame: 2 days before intervention

    baseline VAS

  2. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 1 week after intervention

    Time frame: 1 week after intervention

  3. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 12 months after intervention

    Time frame: 12 months after intervention

  4. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 24 months after intervention

    Time frame: 24 months after intervention

  5. Japanese Orthopedics Association (JOA) at 2 days before intervention

    Time frame: 2 days before intervention

    baseline JOA

  6. Japanese Orthopedics Association (JOA) at 1 week after intervention

    Time frame: 1 week after intervention

  7. Japanese Orthopedics Association (JOA) at 12 months after intervention

    Time frame: 12 months after intervention

  8. Japanese Orthopedics Association (JOA) at 24 months after intervention

    Time frame: 24 months after intervention

  9. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 2 days before intervention

    Time frame: 2 days before intervention

    baseline ODI

  10. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 1 week after intervention

    Time frame: 1 week after intervention

  11. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 12 months after intervention

    Time frame: 12 months after intervention

  12. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 24 months after intervention

    Time frame: 24 months after intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Intervertebral disc height of the operated segments

    Time frame: 2 days before intervention and 1 week, 12 months and 24 months after intervention

  2. Range of motion of the operated segments

    Time frame: 2 days before intervention, 12 months and 24 months after intervention

  3. Complications

    Time frame: 1 week, 12 months and 24 months after intervention

    Complications: includes dural laceration, implant loose, lumbar kyphosis, spinous process fracture or recurrent lumbar disc herniation

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Effectiveness of Wallis Interspinous Dynamic Stability System for Lumbar Disc Herniation: a Prospective Randomised Controlled Study

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2012
First posted
Apr 4, 2013
Registry last updated
Apr 4, 2013

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.