Pharmacy school, University of Seville
Seville, Sevilla, 41012, Spain
NCT Number: NCT07617090
This single-center, randomized, double-blind, crossover clinical trial aims to compare the volumetric visual fields provided by two occupational progressive addition lenses (OPLs) optimized for intermediate and near vision in presbyopic patients. The study evaluates Vimax Zoom 1.5 FWD 4 m and Vimax PC 1.5 FWD 4 m lenses and Vimax Fit FRM, all of them with plano distance power and a +2.00 D near addition, in order to determine differences in the extent of clear vision at multiple working distances.
Participants will undergo a comprehensive optometric examination including medical and ocular history, visual acuity assessment, accommodative amplitude measurement, autorefraction, interpupillary distance measurement, ocular motility evaluation, confrontation visual fields, Amsler grid testing, and binocular vision assessment. Visual field measurements will then be performed using both study lenses under standardized conditions. Subjects will be instructed to maintain a fixed head position while identifying optotypes located at distances of 4 m, 2 m, 1.33 m, 80 cm, 40 cm, and 25 cm. Both lenses will be tested in random order under masked conditions so that neither participants nor investigators know which lens design is being evaluated during each phase.
At least 23 presbyopic participants are expected to be enrolled. The study procedures are non-invasive and are anticipated to be completed in a single one-hour visit, although additional sessions may be scheduled if necessary. No significant risks are expected beyond possible transient visual fatigue associated with the duration of testing.
The primary objective is to determine which occupational progressive lens design provides a greater spatial volume of clear vision and wider horizontal and vertical visual fields at different intermediate and near distances. The findings may contribute to improving personalized recommendations of occupational lenses according to patients' visual demands and working distances.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me52 year–67 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Seville, Sevilla, 41012, Spain
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Fitting and positioning of the spectacles : participants were instructed to move only their eyes and to verbally identify the letters indicated by the optometrist.
Measurement of clear vision limits: the horizontal and vertical boundaries of clear vision were recorded on a scaled results sheet, as defined by the participant using the optotype, at distances of 400, 200, 133, 80, 40, and 25 cm, in that order
Fitting and positioning of the spectacles : participants were instructed to move only their eyes and to verbally identify the letters indicated by the optometrist.
Measurement of clear vision limits: the horizontal and vertical boundaries of clear vision were recorded on a scaled results sheet, as defined by the participant using the optotype, at distances of 400, 200, 133, 80, 40, and 25 cm, in that order
Fitting and positioning of the spectacles : participants were instructed to move only their eyes and to verbally identify the letters indicated by the optometrist.
Measurement of clear vision limits: the horizontal and vertical boundaries of clear vision were recorded on a scaled results sheet, as defined by the participant using the optotype, at distances of 400, 200, 133, 80, 40, and 25 cm, in that order
Time frame: Immediately after the adjustment of the frame where the lenses were placed, an average of 30 minutes per patient.
It will consist of the volume defined by two parallel surfaces bounded by the visual fields perceived with clear horizontal and vertical vision by the patient between the distances of 4 m and 25 cm while wearing each pair of spectacles. The volume will be calculated using the Heronian formula for the volume of a quadrangular pyramidal frustum.
Time frame: Immediately after the adjustment of the frame where the lenses were placed, an average of 30 minutes per patient.
Calculation of the visual field surface areas defined by the patient with each lens type at distances of 4 m, 2 m, 1.33 m, 80 cm, 40 cm, and 25 cm. For this purpose, the areas corresponding to the visual field regions of the lens located between the fitting cross and the intermediate and near viewing zones were summed in a 1:2 proportion, respectively, for each measured distance.
University of Seville
Other
Ensayo clínico, unicéntrico, Transversal, Randomizado, Cruzado, Doble Ciego Para Evaluar Las Diferencias de Los Campos volumétricos de visión en Distancia Intermedia (4m) y Cerca (25cm) de Tres Tipos de Lentes oftálmicas de adición Progresiva (PAL), Dos de visión Intermedia y Cerca (PC-PAL) y Otra Generalista de Vision Lejos, Intermedia y Cerca (GPPAL), Neutros en Vision de Lejos y de 2.00 D en Vision de Cerca en Pacientes présbitas.
Acronym: CIVIUS2025PAL
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03844828
Cataract, Eye Diseases
Makati City, Philippines
View Trial DetailsNCT07161635
Aphakia, Cataract
Torrance, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05510687
Eye Diseases, Presbyopia
Dhaka, Bir Uttom A K Khandakar Road, Bangladesh
View Trial DetailsNCT04465409
Eye Diseases, Genital Diseases
Zlín, Czechia
View Trial Details