Volumetric Intensity-Modulated Arc Therapy
RadiationAdvanced radiotherapy technique
Other names: Intensity modulated radiotherapy
NCT Number: NCT03374592
This study compares the use of conventional radiotherapy technique with volumetric intensity-modulated radiotherapy (VMAT) in the treatment of painful cancer metastases. Half of the patients will receive radiotherapy using a conventional technique, while the other half will receive their treatment using a the VMAT technique.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Radiotherapy to painful sites of metastasis can provide pain relief.
Side-effects from radiotherapy is dependent on the volume and dose received by normal tissues. Conventional radiotherapy techniques delivers similar doses of radiation to the targeted cancer lesion and the normal tissues along the entrance and exit paths of the radiation.
Volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is an advanced technique of radiotherapy that spares normal tissues from receiving high-dose irradiation. However, VMAT increases the volume of normal tissues receiving low-dose irradiation.
This study aims at comparing the quality of life and side-effect profiles of patients treated by palliative radiotherapy using the conventional technique vs. VMAT.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Advanced radiotherapy technique
Other names: Intensity modulated radiotherapy
Conventional radiotherapy technique
Time frame: 1 week
The global QOL subscale will be measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ C30 questionnaire and compared to baseline. The global QOL subscales will be scored according to the EORTC scoring manual (min: 0, max: 100). Higher scores represent better global QOL.
Time frame: 3 month
Quality of life function subscales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social and financial functions) will be measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ C30 questionnaire and compared to baseline. QOL subscales will be scored according to the EORTC scoring manual (min: 0, max: 100). For function subscales, higher scores represent better function.
Time frame: 3 month
Quality of life symptom subscales (dyspnea, pain, fatigue, appetite loss, nausea, constipation, and diarrhea symptoms) will be measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ C30 questionnaire and compared to baseline. QOL subscales will be scored according to the EORTC scoring manual (min: 0, max: 100). For symptom subscales, higher scores represent worse symptoms.
Time frame: 1 week
Pain response to radiotherapy as defined by the International Bone Metastases Consensus Endpoint Definitions
Time frame: 1 month
Pain response to radiotherapy as defined by the International Bone Metastases Consensus Endpoint Definitions
Time frame: 3 month
Pain response to radiotherapy as defined by the International Bone Metastases Consensus Endpoint Definitions
Time frame: 1 week
Descriptive tabulation of toxicities related to radiotherapy as defined by CTCAE v4
Time frame: 1 month
Descriptive tabulation of toxicities related to radiotherapy as defined by CTCAE v4
Time frame: 3 month
Descriptive tabulation of toxicities related to radiotherapy as defined by CTCAE v4
Time frame: Baseline
Time spent in planning and delivering radiotherapy
Time frame: 1 week
Change in the daily number of steps taken by patients before and after radiotherapy as measured using an activity tracker
Time frame: 1 week
Change in cytokine levels in blood following radiotherapy as a biomarker of response to radiotherapy
Time frame: 1 week
Change in circulating microRNA levels in blood following radiotherapy as a biomarker of response to radiotherapy
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Other
A Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial of Volumetric Intensity Modulated Arc Therapy vs. Conventional Radiotherapy for Cancer Pain
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04310410
Bone Cancer, Bone Diseases
Zwolle, Overijsel, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT04307914
Bone Cancer, Bone Diseases
Turku, Finland
View Trial DetailsNCT02511678
Bone Metastasis of Diverse Origins, Neoplasm Metastasis
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01461265
Bone Diseases, Bone Neoplasms
Detroit, Michigan, United States
View Trial Details