University of Rochester
Rochester, New York, 14642, United States
NCT Number: NCT01485627
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a combined intervention for patients, caregivers and oncologists improves communication, quality of life, and quality of care.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me21 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Rochester, New York, 14642, United States
The purpose of this study is to (a) determine whether a combined intervention for patients, caregivers and physicians improves communication regarding treatment choices and prognosis in cancer, (b) to determine whether the intervention improves patient and caregiver well-being, quality of life and sense of peace, and (c) to determine whether the intervention affects health services utilization.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Physicians
Inclusion criteria
Patients
Inclusion criteria
Caregivers
Exclusion criteria
Physicians
Exclusion criteria
Patients
Exclusion criteria
Caregiver
Unable to complete orally-administered surveys in English
Oncologists will receive communication training. Patients will be coached to make the most of the oncologist visit.
Time frame: 3 years
We audio recorded the first physician visit after the coaching session (for intervention) or after study entry (control).The primary outcome was a composite of 4 pre-specified communication measures: 1. engaging patients in consultations, responding to patients' emotions, informing patients about prognosis and treatment choices and balanced framing of decisions. Coding of the 4 measures was performed by teams of trained university students who were audited continuously and blinded to study hypotheses and group assignment. We transformed each of the 4 component scores to z scores based on the pre-randomization phase sample means (SDs): z = (Raw Score - Pre-randomization Phase Mean)/Pre-randomization Phase SD. The 4-component z-scores were averaged to form the primary outcome. A higher Z score indicates better communication. The maximum possible Z-score ranged from -0.69 to 20.08.
Time frame: 7 months
The prolonged grief (PG-13) instrument was used to measure prolonged grief. The tool is a sum of ten items that measure separation distress, duration of grief, cognitive, emotional, and behavioral symptoms and impairment criterion. The range of the score is 10-50 with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.
Time frame: 3 years
Patients and physicians were asked what the likelihood of survival in 2 years would be for the patient. They chose from 0, 10, 25, 50, 75, 90, 100% chance of survival in two years. A value of 0-6 was assigned to each pair of data. 0 indicating no difference in the reported value between patient and physician and 6 indicating the largest difference. For example if the physician said 100% and the patient said 0% the score was 6. The mean scores were reported by arm.
Time frame: 3 years
Original McGill quality of life and the FACT-G assessment tools were used. For the McGill tool scores range from 1 to 10 with higher scores indicating better outcome. For FACT-G scores range from 0 to 4. Higher score means a better outcome. Different parts of the McGill and FACT-G tools were used to create 5 standardized z scores: McGill QOL Scale single item, McGill Psychological Well-Being sub-scale, McGill Existential Well-Being sub-scale, FACT-G Physical Functioning sub-scale and FACT-G Social Functioning sub-scale. Sum of the five standardized z-scores is the Aggregate QOL score. A higher Z score indicates better outcomes. The maximum possible Z-score ranged from -3.54 to 1.24.
Time frame: 7 months
SF-12 scores are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health measured by the scales and 100 indicates the highest level of health.
Time frame: 3 years
Patient charts were audited for 3 outcomes : 1) chemotherapy use, 2) aggressive treatments and 3) emergency department or hospital utilization. The total scores ranged from 0-6 with higher scores indicated worse outcomes. The sums of the means for the 3 outcomes were added to provide the total score.
University of Rochester
Other
Randomized Controlled Trial(RCT)of Patient, Caregiver and Physician Communication Coaching in Advanced Cancer
Acronym: VOICE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07588607
Behavior, Cancer
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03668223
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02693665
Behavior, Cancer
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00774254
Behavior, Cancer
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details