Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01485627

VOICE: Values and Options in Cancer Care

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a combined intervention for patients, caregivers and oncologists improves communication, quality of life, and quality of care.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

21 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Rochester

Rochester, New York, 14642, United States

About this study

The purpose of this study is to (a) determine whether a combined intervention for patients, caregivers and physicians improves communication regarding treatment choices and prognosis in cancer, (b) to determine whether the intervention improves patient and caregiver well-being, quality of life and sense of peace, and (c) to determine whether the intervention affects health services utilization.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Physicians

  • Currently in clinical practice at participating institutions
  • Oncologist that cares for patients with solid tumors
  • Not planning to leave the practice during the next 6 months

Inclusion criteria

Patients

  • Currently a patient of an enrolled physician
  • Age 21 years or older
  • Diagnosis of advanced cancer
  • Able to understand spoken English (study personnel will read materials to low literacy patients)

Inclusion criteria

Caregivers

  • Caregiver of a patient currently enrolled in the study
  • Age 21 years or older
  • Able to understand spoken English (study personnel will read materials to low literacy patients)

Exclusion criteria

Physicians

  • Non Physicians and physicians who are not oncologists
  • Oncologists who exclusively care for patients with hematological malignancies
  • Prior involvement in health-related coaching interventions

Exclusion criteria

Patients

  • Unable to complete orally-administered surveys in English
  • Hospitalized or in hospice care at the time of recruitment
  • Prior involvement in health-related coaching interventions
  • Anticipating bone marrow transplantation or diagnosed with leukemia or lymphoma

Exclusion criteria

Caregiver

Unable to complete orally-administered surveys in English

Treatment and study plan

Communication training and coaching

Behavioral

Oncologists will receive communication training. Patients will be coached to make the most of the oncologist visit.

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Patient-centered Communication in Advanced Cancer Score

    Time frame: 3 years

    We audio recorded the first physician visit after the coaching session (for intervention) or after study entry (control).The primary outcome was a composite of 4 pre-specified communication measures: 1. engaging patients in consultations, responding to patients' emotions, informing patients about prognosis and treatment choices and balanced framing of decisions. Coding of the 4 measures was performed by teams of trained university students who were audited continuously and blinded to study hypotheses and group assignment. We transformed each of the 4 component scores to z scores based on the pre-randomization phase sample means (SDs): z = (Raw Score - Pre-randomization Phase Mean)/Pre-randomization Phase SD. The 4-component z-scores were averaged to form the primary outcome. A higher Z score indicates better communication. The maximum possible Z-score ranged from -0.69 to 20.08.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Caregiver Mean Prolonged Grief Symptoms as Measured by PG-13

    Time frame: 7 months

    The prolonged grief (PG-13) instrument was used to measure prolonged grief. The tool is a sum of ten items that measure separation distress, duration of grief, cognitive, emotional, and behavioral symptoms and impairment criterion. The range of the score is 10-50 with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.

  2. Aim 1b&c Mean Difference in Reported Expectation of Survival in 2 Years Between Patients and Physicians

    Time frame: 3 years

    Patients and physicians were asked what the likelihood of survival in 2 years would be for the patient. They chose from 0, 10, 25, 50, 75, 90, 100% chance of survival in two years. A value of 0-6 was assigned to each pair of data. 0 indicating no difference in the reported value between patient and physician and 6 indicating the largest difference. For example if the physician said 100% and the patient said 0% the score was 6. The mean scores were reported by arm.

  3. Aim 2 Patient Well-being

    Time frame: 3 years

    Original McGill quality of life and the FACT-G assessment tools were used. For the McGill tool scores range from 1 to 10 with higher scores indicating better outcome. For FACT-G scores range from 0 to 4. Higher score means a better outcome. Different parts of the McGill and FACT-G tools were used to create 5 standardized z scores: McGill QOL Scale single item, McGill Psychological Well-Being sub-scale, McGill Existential Well-Being sub-scale, FACT-G Physical Functioning sub-scale and FACT-G Social Functioning sub-scale. Sum of the five standardized z-scores is the Aggregate QOL score. A higher Z score indicates better outcomes. The maximum possible Z-score ranged from -3.54 to 1.24.

  4. Caregiver Mean Overall Mental Health as Measured by the SF-12 Assessment

    Time frame: 7 months

    SF-12 scores are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health measured by the scales and 100 indicates the highest level of health.

  5. Health Care Utilization- Mean Index Score of Aggressive Care at the End of Life

    Time frame: 3 years

    Patient charts were audited for 3 outcomes : 1) chemotherapy use, 2) aggressive treatments and 3) emergency department or hospital utilization. The total scores ranged from 0-6 with higher scores indicated worse outcomes. The sums of the means for the 3 outcomes were added to provide the total score.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Rochester

Other

Collaborators

  • National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Registry information

Official study title

Randomized Controlled Trial(RCT)of Patient, Caregiver and Physician Communication Coaching in Advanced Cancer

Acronym: VOICE

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Dec 5, 2011
Registry last updated
Jan 10, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.