Vedolizumab (VDZ)
DrugParticipants will receive VDZ as part of routine care.
Other names: Entyvio
NCT Number: NCT06249555
The primary aim of this study is to explore the time course of response to Vedolizumab in participants with CD as measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference-short form (SF), as well as other PROMIS domain SFs (fatigue, anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance, physical function, and ability to participate in social roles and activities); other PRO measures will also be assessed.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Vedolizumab (VDZ), a monoclonal antibody that selectively targets intestinal T-cell trafficking, is an effective and safe treatment for moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (CD). Recent evidence from open-label, blinded endpoint studies such as VERSIFY and LOVE-CD provide further support for the efficacy of VDZ in achieving clinical, endoscopic, histologic and radiologic disease improvement in CD. Despite these data, VDZ is generally perceived to have a slower onset of action than other biologics, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists and the interleukin (IL)-12/23 antagonist, ustekinumab (UST). The IL-23 antagonist risankizumab (RISA) has been more recently approved for treatment of CD and post-hoc analyses of SEQUENCE trial data showed RISA to be superior to UST for inducing clinical remission at Week 24, and thus, RISA may also be considered to have a quicker onset of action than VDZ. This perception largely emanates from the results of the VDZ pivotal for CD (GEMINI 2) where efficacy was assessed at Week 6 after only 2 doses in a largely refractory population. However, in clinical practice VDZ induction consists of 3 doses of VDZ 300 mg administered intravenously at weeks 0, 2 and 6 instead of the 2 doses used in the pivotal trials. In recent clinical trials, induction endpoints for therapeutics in CD are now typically measured at least after Week 12. Accordingly, it is uncertain whether the generally held perception of a relatively slow onset of action for VDZ is accurate. Moreover, it should also be noted that the perception of a slow onset of action has also been conflated to infer that VDZ is a relatively less effective induction therapy in CD than TNF antagonists or UST. Further data to evaluate these issues are needed.
Rapidity of symptom resolution, which is commonly used as a surrogate for speed of onset, is a priority for patients and clinicians. It is therefore important to better understand the kinetics of symptom improvement captured using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients initiating VDZ for treatment of CD.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
a. Score is calculated by adding score (1 to 5) for each of the 8 subcomponents.
Exclusion criteria
Note: The treating physician must have completed all appropriate baseline screening tests as per the product label.
Participants will receive VDZ as part of routine care.
Other names: Entyvio
Participants will receive UST as part of routine care.
Other names: Stelara
Participants will receive RISA as part of routine care.
Other names: Skyrizi
Participants will receive GUS as part of routine care.
Other names: Tremfya
Participants will receive MIR as part of routine care.
Other names: Omvoh
Time frame: Baseline to Week 14
Time to meaningful clinical improvement in pain interference, defined as a ≥ 2-point decrease in the PROMIS Pain Interference-SF T-score
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 14, 30, and 52
Time to meaningful clinical improvement for each individual PROMIS domain, defined as a ≥ 2-point change in the direction of improvement in the respective PROMIS domain T-score (Note: A higher PROMIS domain T-score represents more of the concept being measured. For the Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities domain an increase in T-score
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 14, 30, and 52
Meaningful clinical improvement in each individual PROMIS domain at Weeks 14, 30, and 52
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 14, 30, and 52
Meaningful clinical improvement in each individual PROMIS domain at Weeks 14, 30, and 52
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 14, 30, and 52
Meaningful clinical improvement in each individual PROMIS domain at Weeks 14, 30, and 52
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 14, 30, and 52
Meaningful clinical improvement in each individual PROMIS domain at Weeks 14, 30, and 52
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 14, 30, and 52
Meaningful clinical improvement in each individual PROMIS domain at Weeks 14, 30, and 52
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 14, 30, and 52
Meaningful clinical improvement in each individual PROMIS domain at Weeks 14, 30, and 52
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 14, 30, and 52
Meaningful clinical improvement in each individual PROMIS domain at Weeks 14, 30, and 52
Time frame: Baseline to Week 14
Change in PRO-2 (liquid/very soft stool frequency + abdominal pain) from baseline to Week 14.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 14
Change in PROMIS Pain Interference-SF from baseline to Week 14.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 14
Change in PROMIS Fatigue-SF scores from baseline to Week 14.
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2, 6 and 14
Change in PROMIS Anxiety-SF-scores from baseline to Weeks 2, 6, and 14.
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2, 6 and 14
Change in PROMIS Depression- SF-scores from baseline to Weeks 2, 6, and 14.
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2, 6 and 14
Change in PROMIS Sleep Disturbance- SF-scores from baseline to Weeks 2, 6, and 14.
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2, 6 and 14
Change in PROMIS Physical Function- SF-scores from baseline to Weeks 2, 6, and 14.
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2, 6 and 14
Change in PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities- SF-scores from baseline to Weeks 2, 6, and 14.
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 14, 30, and 52
Correlation between PRO-2 scores and each individual PROMIS domain T-score
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 14, 22, 30, 38, 46, and 52
PRO-2 improvement (defined as a stool frequency score defined as a stool frequency score ≤ 3 and abdominal pain score ≤ 1 using unweighted subscores and no worsening of stool frequency and/or abdominal pain scores from baseline )
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 14, 22, 30, 38, 46, and 52
PRO-2 enhanced clinical response defined as a decrease in the weighted PRO-2 of ≥ 50% from baseline through week 52
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 14, 22, 30, 38, 46, and 52
SIBDQ remission (defined as an SIBDQ score ≥ 60) at Weeks 2, 6, 14, 22, 30, 38, 46, and 52
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 14, 22, 30, 38, 46, and 52
PRO-2 clinical response (defined as a decrease in the weighted PRO-2 of ≥ 50% from baseline) at Weeks 2, 6, 14, 22, 30, 38, 46, and 52
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 14, 22, 30, 38, 46, and 52
PRO-2 clinical remission (defined as a stool frequency score ≤ 3 and abdominal pain score ≤ 1 using unweighted subscores) at Weeks 2, 6, 14, 22, 30, 38, 46, and 52
Time frame: Baseline to Week 14
PRO-2 clinical remission at Week 52 among participants who had PRO-2 clinical remission at Week 14
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 14, 22, 30, 38, 46, and 52
PRO-2 clinical response defined as ≥ 30% decrease from baseline in unweighted stool frequency score or a ≥ 30% decrease from baseline in unweighted abdominal pain scores, with neither increasing from baseline
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Alimentiv Inc.
Other
VOICE-Characterization of Early Response to Vedolizumab and IL-23 Antagonists in Participants With Crohn's Disease Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Prospective Observational Study
Acronym: VOICE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06581328
Colitis, Colitis, Ulcerative
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06226883
Crohn Disease, Crohn's Disease
Lancaster, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06430801
Crohn Disease, Crohn's Disease
Dothan, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07545317
Crohn Disease, Crohn's Disease
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
View Trial Details