Georges Pompidou European Hospital
Paris, 75015, France
NCT Number: NCT01431430
It has been proposed that the intake of high dose of cholecalciferol may have beneficial non classical effects (beside bone health). This could include the reduction of type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases, cancers, autoimmune and infectious diseases. These pleiotropic effects are mostly documented by observational and experimental studies or small intervention trials. In renal transplant recipients, vitamin D insufficiency, defined as circulating 25(OH)vitamin D (25OHD) less than 30 ng/mL, is a frequent finding and this population is at risk of the previously cited complications.The primary purpose of this study is to compare the effects of high dose vs. low dose of cholecalciferol on a composite endpoint consisting in de novo diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases, de novo cancer and patient death.Renal transplant recipients between 12 and 48 months after transplantation will be randomized to blindly receive either high or low dose of cholecalciferol with a follow-up of 2 years.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Paris, 75015, France
Rationale :
Vitamin D cannot be considered any more as only necessary to prevent rickets or osteomalacia. Calcitriol produced in the kidney is known to have classical endocrine PHOSPHOCALCIC properties. More recently, vitamin D has been shown to play an important role in reducing the risk of many chronic diseases including type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases, cancers, autoimmune and infectious diseases. These effects may be secondary to local production of calcitriol and to its autocrine and paracrine actions on cellular proliferation and differentiation, apoptosis, insulin and renin secretion, interleukin and bactericidal proteins production. These pleiotropic effects are mostly documented by observational and experimental studies or small intervention trials that most often evaluated intermediate parameters. In renal transplant recipients, vitamin D insufficiency (circulating 25OHD<30 ng/mL or 75 nmol/L) , is a frequent finding with more than 80% of patients displaying this profile.
Objective:
Primary objective: compare the effects of high dose vs. low dose of cholecalciferol on a composite endpoint including
Secondary objectives : compare the effects of high dose vs. low dose of cholecalciferol on
Study protocol
Number of patients: 320 patients in each group Inclusions : 2 years Follow-up after inclusion : 2 years Prospective, randomized, multicentre, double blind clinical study comparing high dose cholecalciferol [100 000 UI FORTHIGHTLY for 2 months then monthly for 22 months) vs. low dose cholecalciferol [12 000 UI FORTHIGHTLY for 2 months then monthly for 22 months).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Cholecalciferol 100 000 UI FORTHIGHTLY for 2 months then monthly for 22 months
Cholecalciferol 12 000 UI FORTHIGHTLY for 2 months then monthly for 22 months.
Time frame: 2 years
De novo diabetes mellitus (fasting glycemia > 7 mmoles/l or glycemia > 11 mmoles/l)
Time frame: 2 years
Cardiovascular complications (acute coronary heart disease, acute heart failure, lower-extremity arterial disease, cerebrovascular disease).
Time frame: 2 years
Diagnosis of the incidence of any new cancer
Time frame: 2 years
Time frame: 2 years
Blood pressure and blood pressure control (number and dosage of antihypertensive drugs)
Time frame: 2 years
Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction
Time frame: 2 years
Infection including opportunistic (CMV, pneumocystis, nocardial infection, cryptococcal infection, aspergillosis)
Time frame: 2 years
Time frame: 2 years
Renal allograft function including estimated glomerular filtration rate, proteinuria
Time frame: 2 years
Time frame: 2 years
PHOSPHOCALCIC biological and clinical relevant parameters : Evolution of serum 25OHD, calcaemia, phosphataemia, serum PTH, bone mineral density and incidence of fractures
Time frame: 2 years
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Other
Prospective Double Blind Multicentre Randomized Trial of Vitamine D Estimating the Profit of a Treatment by Vitamin D3 at the Dose of 100000 UI by Comparison With a Treatment in the Dose of 12 000 UI at Renal Transplanted Patients
Acronym: VITALE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01344434
Renal Transplant Candidate for Left Kidney, Renal Transplant Candidate for Right Kidney
Aarhus, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT05282381
Renal Transplant Candidate for Left Kidney, Renal Transplant Candidate for Right Kidney
Lille, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05411744
Actinomycetales Infections, Bacterial Infections
New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00038727
Body Weight, CVD
Rockville, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details