Clinimark Laboratory Services
Louisville, Colorado, 80027, United States
NCT Number: NCT04285411
Clinical Investigation Plan: Vital USA SpO2 Accuracy Comparison to Arterial Blood CO-Oximetry Study ID# PR 2019-353, Version: Rev 1, Date: 15 Oct 2019 Study Dates: November 4-5, 2019
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–52 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Louisville, Colorado, 80027, United States
An SpO2 accuracy comparison was conducted as part of the final validation of the VitalDetect™ pulse oximetry system. The study was conducted in accordance to Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) for Non-Significant Risk (NSR) investigational studies, following International Standards Organization (ISO) 14155:2011 as appropriate and the pulse oximetry guidelines of ISO 80601-2-61:2017 applicable sections, and Pulse Oximeters - Premarket Notifications Submissions [510(k)s] Guidance For Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff (issued: March 4, 2013).
The purpose of this study was to validate the SpO2 accuracy of the VitalDetect™ pulse oximetry system during non-motion conditions over the range of 70-100% SaO2 as compared to arterial blood samples assessed by CO-Oximetry. It was expected that the Accuracy Root Mean Square (ARMS) performance of the oximetry system would meet the required specification of ARMS of 3.0% or less.
A secondary goal was to evaluate the pulse rate performance simultaneously collected over the SpO2 range covered. The Pulse Rate Accuracy Root Mean Square (Arms) performance of the VitalDetect™ pulse oximetry system, were expected to meet a specification of 3 bpm.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The purpose of this study was to validate the SpO2 accuracy of the VitalDetect™ pulse oximetry system during non-motion conditions over the range of 70-100% SaO2 as compared to arterial blood samples assessed by CO-Oximetry. It was expected that the Accuracy Root Mean Square (ARMS) performance of the oximetry system would meet the required specification of ARMS of 3.0% or less.
Time frame: 90 Seconds
This study was a comparative, single-center, non-randomized study conducted to evaluate the SpO2 accuracy per standards and guidelines identified above for SpO2 accuracy for pulse oximetry equipment over the range of 70-100% SaO2 under non-motion conditions. Arterial blood sampling measured by functional SaO2 CO-Oximetry, was used as the basis for comparison. As a secondary goal, the pulse rate accuracy was compared to ECG Heart Rate realized over the range throughout the hypoxia procedure. Testing was conducted under normal office environment conditions.
Time frame: 90 Seconds
The pulse rate accuracy was compared to ECG Heart Rate as recorded by the S5 Multi-parameter monitor. Passing criteria was an ARMS of 3 bpm or better based measurements observed during the pulse oximetry evaluation.
Vital USA, Inc.
Industry
Results of the SpO2 and Pulse Rate Accuracy Comparison of VitalDetect™ to Arterial Blood CO-Oximetry and Reference ECG
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04258046
Arterial Disease, Venous Malformation
Palo Alto, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03478709
Arterial Disease, Cardiovascular Diseases
Amiens, France
View Trial DetailsNCT03426293
Arterial Disease, Arterial Occlusive Diseases
Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT06740175
Arterial Disease, Arthritis
Groningen, Provincie Groningen, Netherlands
View Trial Details