Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery
Vienna, Austria, 1140
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Johannes Zeilinger, MD
CONTACT
Natascha Bayer, MSc
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT06624826
Comparison of the visual performance of a refractive extended depth of focus intraocular lens in an emmetropic or monovision modality
Interested in participating?
Request Info21 year–105 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Vienna, Austria, 1140
Location status: Recruiting
Johannes Zeilinger, MD
CONTACT
Natascha Bayer, MSc
CONTACT
With an expanding market of different types of intraocular lenses (IOL), spectacle independence is a rising aim in modern cataract surgery. The procedure has in many cases changed from a vision restoring to a presbyopia correcting approach. Although bilateral monofocal IOL implantation, aiming for emmetropia, leads to high levels of patient satisfaction for distance vision, spectacle dependence for reading and intermediate vision tasks is the usual result.
The option commonly used to achieve spectacle independence at intermediate distance (e.g., PC work) is the implantation of enhanced depth of focus (EDOF) IOLs. These IOLs have an extended far focus area which reaches to the intermediate distance, providing high-quality vision over a continuous range of focus, rather than distinct foci with blur in between. In the last years several technologies for EDOF IOLs appeared on the market. The spectrum ranges from small aperture design, bioanalogic design, to diffractive and non-diffractive optics. The disadvantage compared to monofocal lenses in all the technologies mentioned is the potentially worse distance vision and contrast sensitivity as well as dysphotopsia.
A new refractive EDOF lens segment with an extended depth of vision was introduced which promises an increased range of functional vision and less dysphotopsias compared to diffractive EDOF lenses. These non-diffractive IOLs are believed to be a presbyopia correcting alternative for people with existing corneal or macula pathologies, which would preclude them from receiving premium lenses because of the loss of light in the diffractive process. To increase spectacle independence for these patients, IOLs may be used in a monovision modality, with an offset of up to 1.5dpt. This method showed good results in the literature so far for monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses.
Aim of the study is to compare a new non-diffractive EDOF-IOL, namely the PureSee, set for emmetropia or monovision.
120 eyes of 60 patients will be included into this study. Patients will be either randomized in the emmetropia or the monovision group
Follow-up visits will be 1 week after each surgery and 3 months post-surgically. During these visits, the clinical variables to be assessed will be visual acuity, stereopsis, contrast sensitivity, and binocular defocus curves.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
PureSee IOL, emmetropic modality
PureSee IOL, monovision modality
Time frame: 12 months
Corrected and uncorrected binocular visual acuity for near distance will be assessed at 40 cm using ETDRS charts
Time frame: 12 months
Corrected and uncorrected binocular visual acuity for distance will be assessed at 4 m using ETDRS charts
Time frame: 12 months
Corrected and uncorrected binocular visual acuity for intermediate distance will be assessed at 66 cm using ETDRS charts
Time frame: 12 months
Contrast sensitivity will be tested using the Optec Vision tester under mesopic and photopic conditions with and without an additional glare source
Time frame: 12 months
Subjective quality of vision will be assessed using a questionnaire
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Johannes Zeilinger, MD
CONTACT
Natascha Bayer, MSc
CONTACT
Prim. Prof. Dr. Oliver Findl, MBA
Other
Difference in Visual Performance of a Refractive Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens in an Emmetropic or Monovision Modality
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07468409
Cataract, Eye Diseases
Makati City, National Capital Region, Philippines
View Trial DetailsNCT07610226
Cataract, Eye Diseases
Greensboro, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07715591
Anxiety Disorders, Behavior
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07471295
Cataract, Eye Diseases
Prague, Czechia
View Trial Details