OxVPS
Diagnostic TestComparing a new screening tool, the Oxford visual perception screening, to the gold standard, Rivermead Perceptual Battery Assessment.
NCT Number: NCT05981482
The goal of this observational study is to learn how well the Oxford Visual Perception Screening (OxVPS) tool can identify stroke survivors with visual perception difficulties.
The main aim is to determine the accuracy and utility of the OxVPS compared to the current gold standard assessment in stroke survivors. In other words, how well can the Oxford Visual Perception Screening tool (OxVPS) identify stroke patients with visual perception problems?
Participants will completed the OxVPS and the current gold standards visual perception screening tool.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Abingdon Community Hospital, Abingdon, United Kingdom
This is a non-experimental cross-sectional study. It aims to compare the new screening test OxVPS to the gold standard tests for visual perception difficulties.
Patients will be recruited at stroke rehabilitation units at hospitals in the North East of England and in Oxfordshire.
Following consent:
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Comparing a new screening tool, the Oxford visual perception screening, to the gold standard, Rivermead Perceptual Battery Assessment.
Time frame: All testing completed in 2 weeks
Convergent and discriminate validity will be assessed. Convergent validity expressed as a correlation between total score on OxVPS and RPAB. Discriminate validity to be expressed as correlation between OxVPS score and scores of cognitive and sensory vision assessments. Both calculated by a non-parametric Spearman correlation and estimate a 95% confidence interval. The analysis can be completed through the cor.test function in the base package of R.
Time frame: 2 weeks
The inter-rater reliability of OxVPS will be evaluated through a Bland-Altman analysis [26]: we will calculate the difference in OxVPS scores between raters for each patient. Subsequently, we will plot the difference in scores as a function on the average score to evaluate a bias between the raters (mean difference) that might vary based on severity of a patient's visual perceptual problems. We will report the mean difference, standard deviation, and limits of agreement within where 95% of differences between raters fall. A t-test will indicate if the mean difference is significantly different from 0. Analyses will be performed in R with the functions from blandr package (e.g. blandr.statistics and blandr.draw) or functions from a similar package.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Kate Cowen, PhD
CONTACT
Kathleen Vancleef, PhD
CONTACT
Durham University
Other
Accuracy and Utility of the Oxford Visual Perception Screening (OxVPS), a Screening for Visual Perception Difficulties in Stroke Survivors
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05378035
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Arterial Thromboembolism
Hong Kong
View Trial DetailsNCT03821129
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Abnormalities
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06615973
Brain Disease, Brain Diseases
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07737431
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong
View Trial Details