KidSim-Aspire Simulation Research Lab, Alberta Children's Hospital
Calgary, Alberta, T3B6A8, Canada
NCT Number: NCT02231151
The investigators will look at how accurate pediatric healthcare workers are at judging quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, by observation of the chest compressions, and if they are more accurate at a certain position near the patient. The investigators will do this by having participants fill out a survey about the quality of the Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in several recorded resuscitation scenarios.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Calgary, Alberta, T3B6A8, Canada
Pediatric cardiac arrest leads to significant productive years lost, and has a huge emotional impact on families and caregivers. High quality CPR is the most important predictor for outcome in cardiac arrest. Human visual observation is commonly used and important to evaluate CPR quality. Interestingly, the accuracy of healthcare providers' visual assessment of CPR quality is unknown.
Primary Objective: To determine the accuracy of visual CPR assessment. Secondary Objective: 1) To identify the optimal position relative to the patient for accurate CPR assessment. 2) To determine health care practitioners' accuracy in identifying CPR errors.
Methods: We will videotape both good quality CPR and poor quality CPR in a simulated resuscitation. We will record 4 videos, one depicting high quality CPR, and 3 depicting the most common mistakes made when performing chest compressions, and these will be videotaped from the foot, head and side of the patient. Pediatric acute care professionals will be recruited to watch a randomized set of all 12 video clips, and fill out a brief and simple questionnaire on their assessment of the quality of the CPR being performed.
To assess the accuracy of the CPR quality, quantitative data on the quality of the CPR being performed during each of the 4 videotaped events will be captured and confirmed using a Laerdal CPRcard© (depth and rate) and the paediatric simulator SimJr© (recoil).
Operative definitions:
Primary Outcome Measures: Proportion of healthcare providers who are accurate in their visual assessment of CPR quality.
Secondary Outcome Measures:
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants will be randomly assigned 12 videos to watch and rate the CPR quality of each. Investigators will be blind to the identity of the participants.
Time frame: Data is anticipated to be presented 4 months after it is collected.
Time frame: Data is anticipated to be presented 4 months after data is collected.
Time frame: Data is anticipated to be presented about 4 months after it is collected.
KidSIM Simulation Program
Network
Providing Visual Feedback of Quality of CPR During Pediatric Cardiac Arrest: Does Point of View Matter?
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07029724
CPR Quality Assessment
Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06812312
Behavior, CPR
Villarreal, Castellón, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT07729228
CPR Quality Assessment, Cardiac Arrest (CA)
Manhasset, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07329842
Bed Height in CPR, CPR Quality Assessment
Antalya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details