Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João
Porto, Porto District, 4200-319, Portugal
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
João Ferreira-Coimbra, MD
CONTACT
912712480 ext. +351
João Ferreira-Coimbra, MD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NCT Number: NCT07585500
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if virtual reality (VR) helps improve thinking and memory skills in adults who have stayed in the intensive care unit (ICU). The study focuses on people who needed a breathing machine or stayed in the ICU for several days and are at risk for memory or "brain fog" issues.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
* Does using VR improve a participant's memory, attention, and thinking skills after an ICU stay? * Does the "immersive" feel of a VR headset work better to improve these skills than using a handheld tablet?
Researchers will compare three groups to see how different types of care affect the brain:
* VR-Rehab: Participants use a VR headset to play brain-training games. * Tablet-Rehab: Participants use a handheld tablet to play the same brain-training games. * Standard Care: Participants receive the usual hospital care without digital brain games.
Participants will:
* Play brain-training games for 12 minutes every day for up to one week while in the hospital. * Complete memory and thinking tests with a researcher at the start of the study and again after two weeks. * Answer follow-up questions about their memory and thinking skills for 6 months after leaving the hospital.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Porto, Porto District, 4200-319, Portugal
Location status: Recruiting
João Ferreira-Coimbra, MD
CONTACT
912712480 ext. +351
João Ferreira-Coimbra, MD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Study Rationale and the Immersion Hypothesis Survivors of critical illness often face significant cognitive impairments, a key component of Post-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS). While early rehabilitation is recommended, traditional methods often struggle to address cognitive recovery in the acute ICU setting.
This trial is designed to investigate the "Immersion Hypothesis." This hypothesis suggests that the neurological engagement provided by a fully immersive virtual reality (VR) environment offers superior cognitive benefits compared to standard digital content delivered via a 2D interface. By utilizing a three-arm randomized design, the study seeks to isolate whether the therapeutic value comes from the digital exercises themselves or the physiological and psychological impact of total immersion.
Study Design and Arms
Participants are randomized into one of three parallel groups with a 1:1:1 allocation ratio:
Intervention Protocol All digital interventions are performed at the bedside with the participant positioned at a 30° to 60° angle for safety. Sessions are designed for a target "dose" of 12 minutes of active gameplay per day for up to 7 consecutive days (or until ICU discharge).
A "Minimum Therapeutic Dose" is defined for this study as the successful completion of at least 12 individual game sessions. This threshold ensures that participants have reached a level of engagement sufficient to evaluate the impact of the technology on cognitive recovery.
Procedural Rigor and Bias Mitigation
To ensure high-quality data in a non-blinded clinical environment, the trial enforces a strict separation of duties:
Safety Monitoring Participant safety is monitored continuously during every session. Predefined stop criteria include physiological instability (such as a drop in oxygen saturation or significant changes in heart rate) or any verbal/non-verbal signs of distress or "cybersickness."
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A bedside multi-domain rehabilitation program using a head-mounted display. Participants perform 6 gamified tasks targeting both cognitive domains (information processing, attention, memory) and motor domains (motor control, dexterity, and bimanual coordination). The protocol consists of daily 12-minute sessions for a maximum of 7 days.
Other names: Meta Quest Pro, Enhance VR (Virtuleap), VR-Rehab
A bedside rehabilitation program delivered via a handheld tablet. Participants perform 2D versions of the same 6 tasks used in the VR arm, targeting the same cognitive and motor skills. The protocol consists of daily 12-minute sessions for a maximum of 7 days.
Other names: Samsung Galaxy S5e, 2D Digital Rehabilitation, Tablet-Rehab
Time frame: Baseline (T0), Post-intervention (T2: approx. 15-22 days from start), Follow-up 1 (T3: 30-45 days post-discharge), and Follow-up 2 (T4: 3 to 6 months post-discharge).
The MoCA is a tool used to screen for cognitive impairment. It assesses various cognitive domains including attention, concentration, executive functions, memory, language, visuoconstructional skills, conceptual thinking, calculations, and orientation. The total score ranges from 0 to 30 points, with higher scores indicating better cognitive function. For assessments conducted remotely (T3 and T4), a validated blinded/telephone version of the MoCA will be used.
Time frame: Baseline (T0), Post-intervention (T2: approx. 15-22 days from start), Follow-up 1 (T3: 30-45 days post-discharge), and Follow-up 2 (T4: 3 to 6 months post-discharge).
The MRC-SS is used to assess muscle strength in six bilateral muscle groups (shoulder abductors, elbow flexors, wrist extensors, hip flexors, knee extensors, and foot dorsiflexors). Each muscle group is scored from 0 (total paralysis) to 5 (normal strength). The total sum score ranges from 0 to 60, where higher scores indicate better physical strength and motor function.
Time frame: Post-intervention (T2: approximately 15-22 days from start), Follow-up 1 (T3: 30-45 days post-discharge) and Follow-up 2 (T4: 3 to 6 months post-discharge).
A self-report measure used to assess subjective distress caused by traumatic events (in this case, the ICU stay). It contains 22 items covering three subscales: intrusion, avoidance, and hyperarousal. Scores range from 0 to 88, with higher scores indicating a higher level of post-traumatic stress symptoms.
Time frame: Post-intervention (T2: approximately 15-22 days from start), Follow-up 1 (T3: 30-45 days post-discharge), and Follow-up 2 (T4: 3 to 6 months post-discharge).
A standardized instrument for measuring generic health status. It evaluates five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels of severity. It also includes a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where patients rate their health from 0 to 100. Higher index scores and VAS scores indicate better quality of life.
Time frame: Follow-up 1 (T3: 30-45 days post-discharge) and Follow-up 2 (T4: 3 to 6 months post-discharge).
A 9-item multipurpose instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring, and measuring the severity of depression. Each item is scored from 0 to 3. The total score ranges from 0 to 27, where 0-4 is minimal depression and 20-27 is severe depression. Higher scores indicate greater severity of depressive symptoms.
Time frame: Follow-up 1 (T3: 30-45 days post-discharge) and Follow-up 2 (T4: 3 to 6 months post-discharge).
A 7-item self-report questionnaire for screening and severity measuring of generalized anxiety disorder. Items are scored from 0 to 3. Total scores range from 0 to 21. Scores of 5, 10, and 15 represent cut-off points for mild, moderate, and severe anxiety, respectively. Higher scores indicate greater anxiety.
Time frame: During the intervention period for the VR arm, after intervention (daily for up to 7 days).
A standard tool used to measure "cybersickness" symptoms in VR. It assesses 16 symptoms (like nausea, oculomotor strain, and disorientation) on a 4-point scale. This will be used to monitor the safety and tolerability of the immersive VR intervention compared to the tablet. Higher scores indicate greater discomfort.
Time frame: Post-intervention (T1: from the day after the last intervention (Day 8) to the day before T2).
A 10-item questionnaire used to evaluate the usability of the VR and Tablet systems. It covers aspects like complexity and ease of use. The final score is converted to a range of 0 to 100, where higher scores represent better user experience and higher system "acceptability."
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
University of Minho
Other
Virtual Reality Intervention for Post-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS): A Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial for Cognitive, Physical and Psychological Outcomes
Acronym: VR4ICU
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07659431
Cognition Disorders, Cognitive Dysfunction
View Trial DetailsNCT07170527
Critical Illness, Disease Attributes
Ede, Gelderland, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT07035106
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Vienna, Austria
View Trial DetailsNCT06671795
Cognition Disorders, Cognitive Dysfunction
Vienna, Austria
View Trial Details